Breivik’s Facebook – Before And After

If the Norwegians allowed the bearing of arms, like the Swiss, somehow things might have been different last week.  With governments committing endless numbers of false flag terror attacks, citizens need arming to defend themselves.

This came from Me in Comments.  I read it late last night on infowars.com after injuring my leg playing tennis!  It really sums up the fact that there is no doubt we are seeing false flag terrorism again.  


After the attack, Breivik’s original Facebook account disappeared from view (obviously someone has pulled it back from the Internet archive), and a new manufactured version of who Breivik was, surfaced.


He is a patsy.  He was known as a slightly insecure but not extreme person by those that knew him.  They say he has obviously been brainwashed, as the previous Breivik was not capable of such actions, and as is typical in Norway, he will now disappear into the state mental institutions and be kept locked up as an insane person, drugged up to the eyeballs.  He is first facing eight weeks solitary confinement.

People can’t fight back with flowers.



The piece was put up by Alex Jones’ Infowars.  They write –

“It seems as if there are two Breiviks.  The original, a socially liberal, pro-Israel neo-con, and the second post-massacre profile of a Christian conservative, white supremacist.


The second profile has clearly been embellished to push the notion that Breivik’s rampage was driven by his Christian conservative beliefs.  This is convenient given the fact that governments recently introduced the meme that white, Christian conservatives were the leading terror threat.” – Paul Joseph Watson


Before


After



(Now then where’s that compress?  I can hardly walk!)





If some one like Breivik can seems like another victim of these attacks ( as well as one of the perpetrators), then who are the culprits?  It seems that what we imagined was an independent-minded Norway, free from the shackles of the EU, is penetrated by the same evil agencies that have attacked all other western countries.  Norway is being targeted to be suppressed and absorbed into the control of the One World Government, as are all the others.  


Her sister country Switzerland is no doubt going to face something similar.  At least the Swiss have guns and can fight back to some extent!  



UPDATE FROM ME –


Tap, here’s an update.

The Facebook page has to be a fraud, I believe. “legg til venn” in Norwegian means “add friend”. This tag is visible next to Breivik’s name in the first screenshot but not the second.

Since the user chooses what to make visible to those who are not on their friend list, whoever created the page, did not make “philosophy” visible (if there was anything on that).

So who was accepting the friend requests after he was arrested so the screenshot could be taken? The Facebook page was made on 17 July, 5 days before the attacks yet the killer did not choose to make his philosophy public?

He had already written a 1500 page “manifesto” online in which he said “After 5 years in the Freemasons I was finally accepted for rank 4-5.” (link below – he declined the offer due to lack of time, which is why he was 3rd degree).

Being a Freemason is not being a Christian. Do we have any more proof that Breivik wasn’t a Christian?

Word search the “manifesto” http://www.scribd.com/doc/​60739170/2083-a-European-D​eclaration-of-Independence

In it he writes

“Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?

A:
As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarilyconstitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus. Beinga Christian can mean many things;
– That you believe in and want to protect Europe’s Christian cultural heritage

It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus…”

He repeats this

“So no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus…

It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian-

atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christiancultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)).

The PCCTS, Knights Templar is therefore not a religious organisation but rather aChristian “culturalist” military order.”

There is NO SUCH THING AS A CHRISTIAN ATHEIST. You can’t be a Christian without a personal relationship with God and Jesus.

I would like to know if one of Breivik’s real friends knew the Facebook profile as a the second screenshot shows. None have come forward saying this yet.

If you run a google news search for “Facebook hacked” you find it often happens to prominent groups and figures. So certainly there were people who could hack the profile, almost certainly someone did, the hacker accepted friends and may have changed the profile. 

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

12 Responses to “Breivik’s Facebook – Before And After”

  1. Me says:

    Tap, here’s an update.

    The Facebook page has to be a fraud, I believe. “legg til venn” in Norwegian means “add friend”. This tag is visible next to Breivik’s name in the first screenshot but not the second.

    Since the user chooses what to make visible to those who are not on their friend list, whoever created the page, did not make “philosophy” visible (if there was anything on that).

    So who was accepting the friend requests after he was arrested so the screenshot could be taken? The Facebook page was made on 17 July, 5 days before the attacks yet the killer did not choose to make his philosophy public?

    He had already written a 1500 page “manifesto” online in which he said “After 5 years in the Freemasons I was finally accepted for rank 4-5.” (link below – he declined the offer due to lack of time, which is why he was 3rd degree).

    Being a Freemason is not being a Christian. Do we have any more proof that Breivik wasn’t a Christian?

    Word search the “manifesto” http://www.scribd.com/doc/​60739170/2083-a-European-D​eclaration-of-Independence

    In it he writes

    “Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?

    A:
    As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarilyconstitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus. Beinga Christian can mean many things;
    – That you believe in and want to protect Europe’s Christian cultural heritage

    It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus…”

    He repeats this

    “So no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus…

    It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian-

    atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christiancultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)).

    The PCCTS, Knights Templar is therefore not a religious organisation but rather aChristian “culturalist” military order.”

    There is NO SUCH THING AS A CHRISTIAN ATHEIST. You can’t be a Christian without a personal relationship with God and Jesus.

    I would like to know if one of Breivik’s real friends knew the Facebook profile as a the second screenshot shows. None have come forward saying this yet.

    If you run a google news search for “Facebook hacked” you find it often happens to prominent groups and figures. So certainly there were people who could hack the profile, almost certainly someone did, the hacker accepted friends and may have changed the profile.

  2. What I find amazing is that on an island, with all those people, everyone ran no one stood up, no group of people said no this isn’t going to happen.

    One man with a gun, he can only shoot in one direction at a time, 10 people rush him, your going to take him down, yet it didn’t happen.

    In the States, people attempted to take back control of a plane. People stand up, yet else where, people just run and hide.

  3. Me says:

    That might be explained by reports of a second, brown haired, Nordic shooter who could have provided cover fire.

    Even so, if you split up you could set an ambush.

  4. At the very least you try and do something to save your life and the lives of others.

    You think, in this world in which we will watch our own die to send money to Africa.

    Where we punish our own children, yet support countries with nuclear weapons.

    You think, if we are that giving and they caring, why are we not willing to stand up and be counted in order to save others when directly threatened?

    Hey I wasn’t there, but I have had the experience of having people pull guns on me when travelling in Africa, if I was British they would have kill me too, thank god I was travelling as a Canadian.

    But I tell you one think, I didn’t just sit there, I stood up, I walked to him I showed him who I was. Hell if he was going to shoot, he was going to shoot.

  5. Tapestry says:

    As for the US plane, the hijackers were only equipped with box-cutters. If they’d been rushed, they would have been overwhelmed. There are so many evidence problems with 911, it is mostly fabrication.

    At the lake there were news helicopters circling taking pictures. The Police failed to arrive for two hours yet all those kids had mobile phones. It’s not far from Oslo.

    There was more than one gunman on the island. It’s time to stop making deductions from the official story which, like 911, also seems heavily fabricated.

  6. Tapestry says:

    TWEET
    kevinbakhurst Kevin Bakhurst
    by PlatoSays
    AP – Lawyer for Norway attacks suspect says client is surprised he wasn’t stopped earlier #Norway

  7. Me says:

    Is this of note?

    Maurice Glasman was Ed Miliband’s intellectual guru until… July 20th.

    Then

    “Blue Labour, the informal Labour policy group established by Ed Miliband advisor Maurice Glasman, is to be effectively disbanded … following an interview given by the controversial peer in which he expressed a belief that immigration to the UK should be completely halted.”

    July 20th… two days before the false flag carried out by a Freemason predicated on anti-immigration PAGAN CULTURAL EUGENICISM.

    Did someone have prior knowledge and manage to scare Labour off this academic – just in time?

    Two days prior is leaving it very late so perhaps it’s just coincidence.
    http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

    http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

  8. Me says:

    They have deleted from scribd the online “manifesto” that proves Breivik was a lucifer worshiping Freemason, not a Christian. It’s been deleted from other sites too but can still be found via search engine.

    I went back to check again because I’ve just read a comment elsewhere which suggested there is a sentence in the manifesto where Breivik said he was not a Christian. The conclusion that he is not a Christian can anyway be derived, as above, from his pagan cultural eugenics philosophy.

  9. Me says:

    Okay, I’ve read another part of the “manifesto” and he does claim to be “100% Christian”. That doesn’t make him one, his definition of Christian can include atheists and agnostics, but he does in fact claim to be Christian.

  10. Tapestry says:

    The definition of what he is, is totally confusing in the detail. All they want is the headline or soundbite, saying he is whatever they want to say. It is clear who they are targeting in the media narrative. That’s what this is about. The fact is that there is manipulation of his background clearly and demonstrably going on to fit the media’s needs.

  11. Anonymous says:

    I cant really comment on the Facebook issue, but something set off alarm bells when I spotted the day after the incident a picture of Breivik in a Masonic apron. How did they get this picture so quickly?

  12. Anonymous says:

    you wrote: “If the Norwegians allowed the bearing of arms, like the Swiss, somehow things might have been different last week.”

    It might be worth noting that a massacre occurred in Zug in 2001. 14 were killed and 18 injured before the gunman killed himself. The Swiss are also subject to quite a long list of regulations compared to the US. for whatever it’s worth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Switzerland)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.