The Event You Are Not Allowed To See Or Hear

A British Judge Being Arrested In His Own Court under Magna Carta

The video no one in Britain is allowed to see –

beamed in from the USA –

There is no law banning this video.  It is entirely legal.  Yet Google has been requested by the British authorities to remove it from circulation.  Watch it while you can, as this copy has not yet been identified and removed.

http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/censorship/online-censorship-101.html

The event as reported by The Mail

And as reported by the British Constitution Group –
For our explanation of the arrest of Judge Peake itself, please see:

http://www.ukcolumn.org/articles/arrest-and-rescue-judge-peake

There are two main reasons the videos have been taken down, I think. First, there are outstanding court cases for two people in the videos who have been charged with assault. The videos clearly show who assaulted whom, and neither of the two guys arrested assaulted anyone.

The other reason is that the government does not want the actual arrest and rescue of Judge Peake seen. As Twig said, they do not want publicity for Lawful Rebellion.

The mainstream media, where they reported it at all, has mainly portrayed this event as some kind of tax protest. It wasn’t. It was designed to highlight the unlawful imposition of administrative courts in this country.

It was also designed to highlight *our* lawful use of the Grand Jury, the Posse, and the Militia, all still lawful bodies.

The fact that it happened at a hearing of the separate issue of the tax protest of Roger Hayes has no bearing on that day.

For the record, though, Roger’s tax protest doesn’t result from any absolute unwillingness to pay tax in principle, but the fact that council tax is being used for unlawful purposes. If we pay council tax, therefore, we are complicit in that law breaking. For an example – the Audit Commission’s continuing unwillingness to sign off Sheffield City Council’s £1.whatever billion accounts because of irregularities over Common Purpose invoices.

We would argue that in the case of council tax, it should be possible to us to choose which council services we think valuable enough to contribute towards. Education, police (so long as they are peace officers and not revenue collectors), fire service, bins, roads, swimming pools etc, are areas I would happily contribute my share to. The EU, Common Purpose, dodgy property deals, missing millions of redevelopment and regeneration money, ethnic cleansing (think Devonport or soon North Prospect in Plymouth for example), child trafficking under the guise of child protection, massive salaries and gold-plated pensions are areas I am unwilling to contribute to.

The same general point goes for Income Tax. If we as individuals believe the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or the handing of sovereignty to the EU and/or the UN, or any other actions of our government are unlawful, it is, in the view of the BCG, our duty as taxpayers to withhold payment of tax until such times as the government is acting lawfully again.

Cheers,

Mike Robinson
Editor, UK Column and founding member of the British Constitution Group

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Responses to “The Event You Are Not Allowed To See Or Hear”

  1. Sue says:

    [url=http://eyetube.me/play.php?vid=335][img]http://eyetube.me/uploads/player_thumbs/fkBhAwSXo5ZKFAkcCjpU.jpg[/img] Watch “ENGLISHMEN ARREST AN UNLAWFUL COMMON LAW JUDGE HI RES” on EyeTube[/url]

    I can watch them here in Spain. When I notice a You Tube Video has been censored, I download it and re-upload it to EyeTube.

    I’m taking requests 🙂

  2. Tapestry says:

    Thanks Sue. Start a Channel. Banned Videos would be a good title.

  3. Me says:

    there’s also a version on vimeo. the full version is at least 7 mins 45 secs. bedlam in there. videos like that make the state look very weak.

    the problem of replicating that rebellious spirit nationwide is it’s easier cooperating at local level with a small group on an issue about which there is unanimous agreement than at the national level with millions, on multiple issues and where the media can facilitate divide and rule.

    as there is no nationwide feeling of “siege mentality” against the authorities – because the media keeps the people deflected and distracted – I think a successful rebellion against the UK chapter of the globalist mafia must be local… death by a thousand cuts.

    but as the resistance cannot be organised centrally it the success would risk the break up of the United Kingdom and Britain.

    just some thoughts…

  4. Twig says:

    I couldn’t quite work out what was going on and who was arresting who and for what.

  5. I’ve seen this guy previously, he has an idea about common law and judges sitting under oath. I don’t know if he is right or not but it’s some kind of protest against payment of local property taxes ~ I think.

  6. Tapestry says:

    I’ve added a report from the Mail. Maybe the British Constitution Group could call in and comment?

  7. Twig says:

    @Tapestry
    Thanks – I can now see why the government want this hushed up, they obviously want to prevent an outbreak of lawful rebellion across the nation.

  8. For our explanation of the arrest of Judge Peake itself, please see:

    http://www.ukcolumn.org/articles/arrest-and-rescue-judge-peake

    There are two main reasons the videos have been taken down, I think. First, there are outstanding court cases for two people in the videos who have been charged with assault. The videos clearly show who assaulted whom, and neither of the two guys arrested assaulted anyone.

    The other reason is that the government does not want the actual arrest and rescue of Judge Peake seen. As Twig said, they do not want publicity for Lawful Rebellion.

    The mainstream media, where they reported it at all, has mainly portrayed this event as some kind of tax protest. It wasn’t. It was designed to highlight the unlawful imposition of administrative courts in this country.

    It was also designed to highlight *our* lawful use of the Grand Jury, the Posse, and the Militia, all still lawful bodies.

    The fact that it happened at a hearing of the separate issue of the tax protest of Roger Hayes has no bearing on that day.

    For the record, though, Roger’s tax protest doesn’t result from any absolute unwillingness to pay tax in principle, but the fact that council tax is being used for unlawful purposes. If we pay council tax, therefore, we are complicit in that law breaking. For an example – the Audit Commission’s continuing unwillingness to sign off Sheffield City Council’s £1.whatever billion accounts because of irregularities over Common Purpose invoices.

    We would argue that in the case of council tax, it should be possible to us to choose which council services we think valuable enough to contribute towards. Education, police (so long as they are peace officers and not revenue collectors), fire service, bins, roads, swimming pools etc, are areas I would happily contribute my share to. The EU, Common Purpose, dodgy property deals, missing millions of redevelopment and regeneration money, ethnic cleansing (think Devonport or soon North Prospect in Plymouth for example), child trafficking under the guise of child protection, massive salaries and gold-plated pensions are areas I am unwilling to contribute to.

    The same general point goes for Income Tax. If we as individuals believe the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or the handing of sovereignty to the EU and/or the UN, or any other actions of our government are unlawful, it is, in the view of the BCG, our duty as taxpayers to withhold payment of tax until such times as the government is acting lawfully again.

    Cheers,

    Mike Robinson
    Editor, UK Column and founding member of the British Constitution Group

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.