The weak part of the judge’s decision is when he says that she should not have communicated her story through the internet or through Parliament. What the hell else is the mother to do? And what’s the difference between the internet and any other communication channel?
If his decision rests on that, he’s not working well.
As for the allegations implying a mother can teach a daughter to call a father a paedophile, how would a girl of 5/6/7 even know what it was unless it had happened to her?
I know. It must be true. It’s in the papers.
Following my report last week that the former jockey and trainer Vicky Haigh had fled to Ireland to pre-empt her unborn baby being seized by Nottinghamshire social workers, she received a call on her mobile from Nottinghamshire police. “Your social worker,” she was told, “has reported you as a missing person.” Miss Haigh’s reply was that she was not aware that she had a social worker, and that she was certainly not a “missing person”, since she was well aware of where she was – in Ireland, as had been reported by a national newspaper.
COMMENT – UPDATE ON VICKY HAIGH – will she soon be re-united with her daughter R…..? (Please keep up the Public pressure, Vicky remains innocent of any wrong-doing!)
We have reason to believe they have been fuelled by the BROTHER of the paedo-father, called MICHAEL **** of the Humberside police Force! Guilty David **** (the errant father) is obviously losing his stranglehold on Justice, and hitting out in any way he can now: he vindictively called ’999′ when Vicky saw her daughter, and made up lies to get Vicky arrested, FOR NO GOOD REASON!
This is why she wasn’t even charged with anything: such madness. Now, is it possible they are maybe stopping to THINK for a change?
PC Andy Bursall literally tricked Vicky into attending the station last night “just to do a quick interview and then return home” then locked her in a cell on arrival and he went home. Disgusting? Is he by any chance a friend of David or Michael ****’s?
This proves the police have committed serious (criminal) negligence. They have built their “case” on sand, compounding confusion and lies on top of one another, fuelled by guilty and wrongful agendas.
(are they are on a targets bonus?)
Government interference with families should be abolished – and heavily fines administered to offenders! Please keep up the great support and invaluable help
Here’s another case of serial injustice, allegation of unaddressed illegal acts by government officials, combined with media silence…
UPDATE on ‘The Child Stealing Epidemic’ from eureferendum
Completely unable or unwilling to address the issues raised by Booker on the child-stealing epidemic, The Guardian instead focuses on attacking Booker, on the basis of criticism by Judge Bellamy.
The thrust of the argument is that Booker did not attend the court proceedings about which he has written, demonstrating that James Robinson, the media correspondent is clearly unable to grasp the issues – viz that reporting restrictions prevent any details of the court cases being published. Every time Booker has sought to obtain details with a view to publication, he has been blocked.
When he originally posted the story, Robinson was unaware even of Booker’s rebuttal in last weekend’s edition of The Sunday Failygraph, leaving his piece more than a little unbalanced. But then, we don’t expect Guardian media correspondents actually to read the work of the journalists they are criticising. Only now that he has been advised of the content have we seen a substantial silent edit. Being in the MSM means, as always, never having to admit you are wrong.
Moonbat is also at it, with such boring, repetitive predictability that it simply re-affirms that the man has lost the plot, and that the newspaper for which he works has given up any attempt seriously at reporting news objectively (or at all, in many cases).
The controversy of the stolen children continues, however, on a legal blog, an entry in the comments pointing out that even when a journalist from the Failygraph actually attended a court, he was not allowed to report any detail, rather making Booker’s point. Unfortunately, we are not in the real world here, and any attempt at address the real issues gets lost in the miasma of prejudice and woolly thinking.
There is no hope here – reason has long departed.
COMMENT FROM STEPHEN JENNER on EUREFERENDUM –
My wife works in the NHS as a nurse at a respite centre for children with special needs, she works closely with social services, and parents… My niece works as a nurse at an NHS hospital, her speciality and training is in the mental health arena. My wife makes regular visits to the homes of children, and without naming any names she often tells me that she has never witnessed such squalor and frankly weird behaviour by parents who are often deprived themselves. My niece tells me that many of her ‘clients’ are parents who also happen to be mentally unstable due to addictions of some sort, and for these parents, lying is second nature.
I was driving along the other day and I mentioned the stories that I had been reading from Christopher, and they were pretty unsympathetic, they seemed to indicate that in most cases, judgements by the various professions were well founded.
They both talked about the practice of holding “case conferences” where those involved, doctors, nurses, social workers, police and parents were all invited to take part and all would have their chance to speak and present their case. However, in many cases the parents did not show up, despite cancellations being arranged so that they could/would appear later. I said that I suspected that many parents would feel intimidated by the “experts” all ranged against them, they said that these were civilised events and that in most cases they, “the professionals” knew that they were doing the right thing.
So anyway, I hear the argument from both sides, and it seems to me that the biggest issue is the secretive nature and the gagging orders placed on parents who really do believe that there has been some sort of rough justice handed down. This secrecy seems to be “for the sake of the children”, and it is this that I don’t buy and cannot accept, in these cases the behaviour by the authorities serves none of the victims, the children (victims of the state) and parents (victims of the state)!
Surely the simple thing would be to allow such parents to get some redress, by calling their own experts and having their own full recourse to the courts, at the expense of us if necessary, because it is at our expense that any poor judgements are being made in the first place.
It might also help if judges had to face the regular scrutiny of the public, the sort of closed shop that they operate in cannot be healthy, surely the parents should be able to state whether the charges that they face should be deliberated in public, or in camera, rather than the authorities. The children are frequently too young or mentally incapacitated to know what is being done (allegedly) on their behalf anyway.
This does not seem to be a matter for rocketeers.
MY DADDY IS A PAEDOPHILE
HOW SEXUAL ABUSE BECAME THE REASON FOR ALLOWING MORE OF IT!
This story cannot be imagined because it is too outrageous. It must be believed because it is
true. It has happened and is happening NOW, involving a 7-year-old girl whose father is a
paedophile and whose mother tried to save her from him.
She divorced him and is pregnant again from a loving partner who was a key victim to the
girl admitting to abuse.
In the process of rescuing her daughter from her father, the mother had to get involved with
six major players of a Local Authority
eight Social Workers, a number of managers of the Children and Family Court
Advisory Service CAFCASS, supposedly to be disbanded,
seven medical professionals,
a few „miscellanous‟ players.
Evidence of the girl being abused has existed since December 2006. She has been away from
her mother since November 2010.
Fraudulent court proceedings were instigated by a social worker who pretended to be „head
lawyer‟ and continued by a qualified solicitor involving eight solicitors or barristers and four
This Council in question is one of many abusing a new industry of „forced adoptions
or the state stealing children
. Social Services are such that one website is called
Social Service Hell
and a class action has been placed before the International Criminal
Court in The Hague
There is a “Reporting Restriction Order” out against “The Media” which the Council‟s
lawyer served on WordPress after I published an item relating to the case.
the document to be legal while I question its validity in Court, as Advocate of the Rule of
Law in the Public Interest, together with Liz Watson of One Voice Action group.
Hence this „anonymised‟ version of the story that Liz put together before I edited it.
Go To http://nameshamesocialworkers.blogspot.com/