Open Europe – Writing in the Times, David Cameron, Barack Obama and Nicolas Sarkozy argue that “the bombing continues until Gaddafi goes”. That means one thing. The bombing will continue until Cameron resigns, along with Obama and Sarkozy. After all, why should Gaddafi go? He didn’t start any wars. That was David Cameron. He’s the one who should be got rid of for indulging in unnecessary barbarism, inflicted with the purpose of subduing an independent and benign nation, Libya.
Libya was used as the cover story by the CIA for fomenting terrorism across Europe through the 1970s and 1980s. The CIA were and are the terrorists. The One World Government, who David Cameron hopes will reward him with as many millions as they did Blair, assassinated British politicians who wanted to resist the advance of the EU, as Enoch Powell realised, as written in Simon Heffer’s biography Beyond The Roman. Powell knew that Libya was not behind the assaults on our peace.
Libya was a dream state before the bombing started. No citizens of any country in the world enjoyed such good state services and such a strong economy, and such good educational support. Gaddafi wanted to bring the same freedoms and high standards of living to the rest of Africa, widening the use of his independent currency, the DInar, and escaping the rapaciousness of the Rothschild/Rockefeller Central Banking model that has brought ruin to America and Europe.
And this is what Cameron, Sarkozy and Obama are determined to stop to please their paymasters.
Global Research – written by Ellen Brown –
Several writers have noted the odd fact that the Libyan rebels took time out from their rebellion in March to create their own central bank – this before they even had a government. Robert Wenzel wrote in the Economic Policy Journal:
Whatever might be said of Gaddafi, the Libyan people seem to be thriving. A delegation of medical professionals from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus wrote in an appeal to Russian President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin that after becoming acquainted with Libyan life, it was their view that in few nations did people live in such comfort:
The most renegade of the lot could be Libya and Iraq, the two that have actually been attacked. Kenneth Schortgen Jr., writing on Examiner.com, noted that “[s]ix months before the US moved into Iraq to take down Saddam Hussein, the oil nation had made the move to accept Euros instead of dollars for oil, and this became a threat to the global dominance of the dollar as the reserve currency, and its dominion as the petrodollar.”
According to a Russian article titled “Bombing of Lybia – Punishment for Ghaddafi for His Attempt to Refuse US Dollar,” Gadaffi made a similarly bold move: he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. Gadaffi suggested establishing a united African continent, with its 200 million people using this single currency. During the past year, the idea was approved by many Arab countries and most African countries. The only opponents were the Republic of South Africa and the head of the League of Arab States. The initiative was viewed negatively by the USA and the European Union, with French president Nicolas Sarkozy calling Libya a threat to the financial security of mankind; but Gaddafi was not swayed and continued his push for the creation of a united Africa.
And that brings us back to the puzzle of the Libyan central bank. In an article posted on the Market Oracle, Eric Encina observed:
How they manipulate public opinion –
Libya – ground invasion? Or no ground invasion? They say no invasion, then come up with any excuse they need to do what the intended all along – to take the country with troops on the ground. People just switch off, when they are presented with continually switching and changing information, and they become compliant.
Note – Enoch Powell saw the rising American ambition as a great threat to Britain’s independence even in 1943. He wrote to his parents –
The thought struck me for the first time today that our duty to our country may not terminate with the peace – apart, I mean, from the duty of begetting children to bear arms for the King in the next generation. To be more explicit, I see growing on the horizon the greater peril than Germany or Japan ever were; and if the present hostilities do not actually merge into a war with our terrible enemy, America, it will remain for those of us who have the necessary knowledge and insight to do what we can where we can to help Britain be victorious again in her next crisis.
- Letter to his parents (16 February, 1943), from Simon Heffer, Like the Roman. The Life of Enoch Powell (Phoenix, 1999), p. 75