Who Owns The Bank Of England? (Updated)

UPDATED March 7th 2011
new material from ”what’s all this about?”
You ask that question to one thousand Britons, and I kid you not, all of them will say that it is owned by the Government. They would be wrong.
The Bank Of England was originally a private bank, which contracted to lend money to the British Government in a financial crisis. It was privately owned at its foundation and remained so until the post-war Labour government nationalised it in 1946.
So it is owned by the government?
No.
Here is how Wikipedia explains it.

In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank of England Nominees Limited, (BOEN), a private limited company, with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. According to its Memorandum & Articles of Association, its objectives are:- “To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”

Bank of England Nominees Limited was granted an exemption by Edmund Dell, Secretary of State for Trade, from the disclosure requirements under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 , because, “it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders.” The Bank of England is also protected by its Royal Charter status, and the Official Secrets Act.

In other words, you and I are not allowed to know who the shareholders are who own the company which carries out Central Banking in the UK. Some people say that Mandelson’s buddies, the Rothschilds are major shareholders. Also the Queen. But the information is secret. We are not allowed to know.
But what would surprise everybody is that the Bank Of England, which is entitled to issue cash, then lend it and charge interest to the government, is still essentially a private business.
What would also surprise people is so is the Federal Reserve of America a privately owned bank, and all central banks of the world, including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Switzerland, which is the Central Banks’ clearing house.
If the One World Government actually had an address, this would be part of it – the B.I.S, another privately owned bank, the central bankers’ central bank, beyond the control of democracy or government, able to influence events secretly from behind the scenes. One thing is for sure is that in times of financial crisis, these central banking networks become supremely powerful, as those like Gordon Brown allow their countries to become effectively indebted to the point of loss of control.
The people wielding this power see the world’s financial crisis as their moment of opportunity to seize greater power. The scary part of that is that hardly a living soul even knows they exist. Now that’s real power.
What’s all this about?
Professor Carroll Quigley wrote a book on who ruled the the USA and Britain between 1870 and 1960, called Tragedy And Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time.  His publisher MacMillan, was taken over as they first published his book, and the plates and the manuscript were destroyed.  But not before a handful of them had been sold.  In this book, Professor Quigley wrote  –
The power of the Bank Of England and of its governor was admitted by most qualified observers.  In January 1924, Reginald McKenna, who had been Chancellor Of The Exchequer in 1915-1916, as Chairman of the Board of The Midland Bank, told its stockholder:”I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money…And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.”

Quigley also wrote –
..the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.”

Another book continues the story, Secret Records Revealed  by Dr Dennis Cuddy –
On August 5th 1995, the New York Times published an article by Keith Bradsher, in which he wrote –
In a small Swiss city sits an international organisation so obscure and secretive…Control of the institution, the Bank for International Settlements, lies with some of the world’s most powerful and least visible men: the heads of thirty-two central banks, officials able to shift billions of dollars at the stroke of a pen.”

On June 28th 1998, The Washington Post published an article about the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) titled, “At Secret Meetings in Switzerland, 13 people shape the world’s economy”, which described these individuals as “this economic cabal…this secretive group…the financial barons who control the world’s supply of money.”

Quigley again –
Each Central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

They are not all Jewish by the way.
Dr Stan Monteith in The Brotherhood Of Darkness (Anomolos) writes –
Anti-Semitism is a smokescreen created to conceal the identity of the true enemy.

He explains that the objective of the secretive groups is to bring about the surrender of sovereignty and of national independence.
What will replace it?
The UN is being prepared to assume power over the world, but who will control all this power?
How will the US and other military forces be neutralised?
The simple notions of One World Government in theory, can get very confusing in the practice.
As a hundred years have gone by since the move to One World Government began, now reaching the advanced stage, the confusion from hereon can only get much much worse.  The best thing the One World Government, which does already exist, could do, is start telling the world who they are, how they got to where they are, and what they intend to do.  Only then will the growing chaos of secretive groups running the world out of sight start to unravel.  There are of course, many ugly secrets to be told, and some of those secrets might well be to do with this man.  Why doesn’t Prince Charles tell us more of what he knows about the worldwide environmental programmes and who is behind them?  
And what is his brother Andrew up to in Kazakhstan?   And elsewhere around the planet?  It’s not all about pretty girls.   Are the Royal family involved in Central Banking as one of the original shareholders of the Bank Of England?  I guess so, but the media prefers to keep them presented as a couple of harmless buffoons, sustained merely by the generosity of the taxpayer.  Think again.
Daily Mail photograph

Bloomberg TV have just announced that Ben Broadbent of Goldman Sachs is to take over as Bank of England policy maker (Brit in comments on original post)……..not that Goldman Sachs has any financial interest in the decisions of the Bank Of England, of course.  The door revolves.  The real government of Britain and the World, as ever barely visible.


Times front page on Andrew’s links to Kazakhstan.  The media are using Andrew’s womanising as the smokescreen to cover up the real story.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Responses to “Who Owns The Bank Of England? (Updated)”

  1. Snakey says:

    “Each Central bank sought to dominate its government”

    Quigley’s statement implies that it wasn’t something government wanted and that poor victim governments were unable and powerless to resist this nefarious manipulation. What rot. Private banking cartels are not private, they are State agents. They are the government. They have been given permission to do what they do. As you rightly point out the BoE has a Royal Charter. That looks like permission to me – hence State Agent, not manipulator of the State.

    Corporatism is the State and the State is corporatism. They may appear to be separate from each other and in conflict with each other but that is an illusion. It is in reality a relationship of symbiosis and agreement, and the MSM and old State insiders like Quigley do like to keep the illusion going that the two systems are in conflict when the very opposite is the truth.

    It is a deliberate “divide and conquer” strategy to make us believe that there is an enemy outside of the State that is controlling the State when no such thing is occurring.

    The giveaway word is “co-operative” politicians. Therefore no conflict exists if the contract is a co-operative one.

    Keep up the good work. Your posts are interesting and thought provoking. I don’t always comment but I do try to read your blog every day 🙂

  2. Tapestry says:

    Reading my blog every day, Snakey? Essential I’d say. Quigley is the only original source for what happened in the secret groups that established the British end of the NWO, before it was passed over to the US section in 1918.

    There is a one helluva storm going on outside (Manila) with torrential downpour. They’ve sent HAARP to get me, the bastards.

  3. Snakey says:

    I agree that without the Quigley books (both of which I have plodded through as his style is very dry) we wouldn’t know about the secretive groups which led to such organisations as the CFR. I just reserve the right to disagree with his assessment that governments are in some way victims of some nefarious plot hatched up by bankers, when it’s governments themselves that instigate said plots and are in bed with the bankers. Quigley clearly tried to get the word out and his historical record is certainly worth protecting.

    Hope your weather improves 🙂

  4. Tapestry says:

    The moral equation can be decided upon once the facts are known. There might be the occasional innocent politician! Who knows? I know of some well-meaning ones, who seem blissfully unaware of the real basis of power. Maybe they find out late in the piece how things are really stacked up.

  5. Anonymous says:

    To Snakey you make the which comes first the chicken or the the egg question—but in this case we know the Governments were born from/after the Monarchy.We also know said Governments beheaded or murdered the Monarchs and stole their lands and wealth, supposedly on behalf of the people —and we know how that turned out. .So fairs fgair

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.