Don’t Trust The Libyan Horror Stories

From Kev Boyle’s Blog

On LBC (London Broadcasting) radio this morning there was a live poll of Londoners, the results of which were intermittently broadcast. At the end of the first hour the balance was 72% against military action, 28% in favour.

By the end of the show this balance had changed to 52% against, 48% for. 

In the meantime there were also a stream of callers claiming to be Libyans who plied their way through a long list of absolutely horrific crimes of the Gaddafi regime including (for a taste of the horror recited):

A young boy was overheard making a phone call. The authorities went to his house, took him away, beheaded him and brought his head back to his mother saying she should give it to his brother to play with.

This kind of thing reminds one of the Kuwaiti Princess who went on world TV in 1991 alleging that Iraqi soldiers in a Kuwaiti hospital were taking premature babies from their incubators and killing them. This story was later proved (and admitted) to be a complete lie. 

I called LBC to contribute to their phone-in to say this but they would not let me on air.

if such horrors were routinely occurring (as the callers allege) you can be quite sure we would all have heard about such incidents long before this crucial moment arrived.

Garnering support for military attacks matters. The British public (in London at least), it appears, are against this action and a media blitz of such propaganda is almost certainly on its way into your living rooms.

Don’t trust a word these war-mongers say. Someone is trying to make your heart shed virtual blood in order that you will applaud the reality of real Libyans will shedding real blood.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

3 Responses to “Don’t Trust The Libyan Horror Stories”

  1. Stuart Fairney says:

    Yes the propaganda is coming thick and fast, you recall yesterday’s story about the RAF aborting an attack for fear of hitting civilians? a SKY reporter let the cat out of the bag when he announced there was a CNN live broadcast from the target area. The fear was that the bloody horror would be seen live and uncensored, thus the abort.

    Are news organisations even checking stories or just readong press releases?

  2. Stuart Fairney says:

    And of course you could wind-up people to want to attack Bahrain by having a few Bahrainis on explaining how the Saudis attacked an entirely peaceful protest for actual democracy and started to murder people.

  3. Tapestry says:

    And all the b/s about Obama being indecisive trying to make Sarkozy and Cameron look like the big deal decision-takers.

    I prefer not to watch. News readers are just as much the war criminals as David Cameron and Blair.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.