A Lion Led By A Donkey

Dear old Malcolm Lord Pearson, leader of UKIP, is none too bright. He decides to attack the Burka, which is not much of a problem in Britain as I can see. Outside of Central London, where are these hordes of burka wearers? There might be ten or twenty of them in Harrods one or two days a week, spending lots of oil money. London is an international city, which should not be raising barriers to wealthy visitors. I cannot see that in Britain generally this issue has much relevance.

Pearson’s problem is to maintain visibility in an election in which most voters are simply desperate to get rid of the government, and his little Dad’s Army are in danger of being marginalised by the big parties. On the other side, UKIP are being eaten into by the BNP, where IQ tests are not required as part of the membership qualifications. Pearson also wants a share of the dumbed down action coming from that angle.

But in trying to grab a headline, he has only raised one issue in the minds of voters.

Lord Pearson brings Wilders to the House Of Lords to be interviewed. He seems more interested in creating a party to fight Islamism than to get Britain out of the EU.

What is UKIP for?

The answer should be that UKIP exists to ensure that Britain leaves the EU. In featuring marginal issues such as burka-wearing, the primary message of the party is getting clouded.

Nothing is more certain to ensure Britain doesn’t get out of the EU, than Pearson’s other new policy declaration, the intended blocking of eurosceptic Conservative MPs from Westminster. Now Malcolm’s stating that even the most ardent Conservative eurosceptics will face UKIP competition for votes at the GE. What exactly is the point in that, and how does it help Britain get out of the EU? Pearson’s answers to this don’t make any sense.

UKIP is not an insignificant party. In particular its success in the European EP elections, in which the party came second winning 2.4 million votes, or 16.5%, pushing Labour into third place, has had the effect of crushing all talk of proportional representation in Britain. For that Britain must be eternally grateful to the party. A combined vote of UKIP and Conservative under PR would be near enough an outright majority, while Labour and Lib Dem together would be 10% short. PR was undoubtedly part of the EU’s strategy to keep Britain snarled up in red tape, if the Conservatives started to win elections. UKIP’s strength in EP elections, much of it due to Nigel Farage’s skill as a communicator, has buried that threat for good, it seems.

This strength has been built by sticking to the knitting – working for a UK exit from Europe.

In terms of actually getting Britain out of Europe, nothing is more calculated to keep us stuck in place than UKIP’s current strategy for the general election. Led by Malcolm Pearson who seems to have no idea what his primary objectives are and how he is going to achieve them, the party is starting to look small-minded, chippy, in a phrase, none too bright.

Pearson can’t see the big picture, so he runs and hides in the little details. It’s exactly what British politics doesn’t need – another small mind with no vision. We need leading out of the mess we are in. Pearson knows how to get angry and strike out at illogical targets like burkas and eurosceptic Conservative MPs, but that is about it. We don’t need another angry little man, rather pleased with himself at achieving a little position, who cannot keep his eye on the ball. We want someone who can raise our game.

The only serious chance UKIP might have at the GE is to get Farage elected to Buckingham against John Bercow. If the focus was on this one seat, and getting the first UKIP MP elected to Westminster, that would be a worthwhile objective. But UKIP is now looking lost, delving into the realms of stupidity, keeping good eurosceptics out of seats for no reason other than a desire to be seen as important by Lord Pearson. There’s no point in electing Farage when he’s part of such a stupid party. Pearson has raised the risk of damage to the eurosceptic cause, without achieving any advantage.

It’s a shame Farage cannot be elected as an independent. He has enough personal kudos to be elected without needing the UKIP badge. For Conservative voters who would support Farage, but who are worried about letting loose a party looking as if it will slide into a culturist racist quagmire at any second, an independent Farage might be a more attactive proposition. Britain needs a lion like Farage in the Commons. It doesn’t need a party like UKIP, adrift in the political ocean without a compass.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

11 Responses to “A Lion Led By A Donkey”

  1. Twig says:

    UKIP are the real Conservatives.
    The Tories lost the plot when they stabbed Maggie in the back.

    Have a look at UKIP’s policies and see which how many you disagree with: UKIP policies in brief 2009

  2. tapestry says:

    UKIP exists for one purpose only – to get Britain out if the EU,or defer and deter further EU power over Britain.

    All other UKIP policies simply detract from the main message.

    Is UKIP serious about getting the UK out of Europe? I see no sign of it.

  3. Twig says:


    In your own words getting Britain out of the EU is their main purpose, so why do you think they’re not serious about it?

    They even offered Cameron a “no contest” deal if he would give a cast iron guarantee of an “in or out” referendum – that sounds serious to me.

  4. tapestry says:

    They offered nothing. They only said that they might disband UKIP once Britain was out of the EU. It was very vague, and not supported by the general party. Pearson had not got the party behind him.

    UKIP does not desire the end of UKIP. That is the problem.

  5. Twig says:

    Why should UKIP desire an end to UKIP?

    If we were to achieve independence, it would still need to be defended, against further treachery from the main three.

    It’s the current bunch in Westminster that need disbanding.

  6. tapestry says:

    Fighting talk.

    UKIP should stick to the knitting and be concerned only with Britain’s exit from the EU.

    What you might soon find is the Conservatives fighting to repatriate powers from Brussels, with UKIP fighting them every inch of the way to stop them.

    It’s not logical.

    If UKIP exists to get Britain out of Europe, it has no future beyond Britain’s exit. By keeping eurosceptics out of Parliament, UKIP are prolonging Britain’s agony.

    UKIP are becoming a self-serving party….a rebel without a cause trying to find one.

    Islamism is its first attempt to redefine its role. But why does the role need defining?

    There are more genuine eurosceptics on the Conservative back benches than in UKIP, it seems to me.

    Thanks for commenting, Twig.

    I would give Cameron a chance first. If he fails then the situation might open up. But right now there are many good eurosceptics in Westminster who need to get control of the Conservative Party.

  7. Robin says:

    Where are these EUrosceptics ?
    They can`t be in the once was Tory party,led by the spiv Cameron.

    Either you`re a Tory tribalist that puts party before nation, as the Conservatives do, or you leave that party and properly fight for the country.

  8. tapestry says:

    I left the conservatives in 2000 for one year and worked within UKIP. The I returned to the Conservatives to support IDS, and stop Portillo winning the leadership.

    The Conservative brand was severely damaged by propaganda from 1994 onwards. Cameron would not be on the point of power had he not acted to pretend to be a Blair. Just as Blair acted like a Tory, he was not a Tory once in office. Cameron will not be the same as he’s acted throughout the time in opposition.

    How else would he have persuaded the media to work with him.

  9. robin says:

    If Cameron is courting the Labour, Warmist, pro EU vote, He cannot be after the Conservative, climate change sceptic, EUrosceptic vote.

    So why would anyone in the last three groups vote for him ?

  10. tapestry says:

    He’s not courting anyone’s vote, Robin. He’s merely staying onside with the BBC because he has to.

  11. tapestry says:

    He cannot break cover pre-election. He was able to rebrand the party by pretending to be a mediaphile, tipping his hat to the the gate-keepers. The reality of power in Britain is that the media holds the keys to downing street. The anti-media voters are a minority. The majority are sheep who think what the media permits them to think. The likes of you, Robin, who’ve developed your own thought processes independently of the media are still relatively rare.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.