Herd Immunity or Herd Mentality?

A SUMMARY OF THE COVID CON JOB

by Kieron McFadden

London 22/8/20

In a nutshell:

  • Original mathematical models and predictions, upon which the initial implanting of fear in the national psyche was based, wildly inaccurate and egregiously alarmist.
  • Death stats extremely false.
  • Hospital admissions stat extremely false.
  • “Tested positive” stat unreliable and false due to test not fit for the purpose but we cannot be sure if that’s falsely high or falsely low.
  • Currently new admissions and critical care beds occupied “with COVID 19” around 70 a day. There are over 1200 hospitals in the UK – so that’s about 17 hospitals per admission or per person in critical care! And that’s with the falsified figures! That’s an epidemic is it?

Main article

If you are going to run a  terror-reliant plandemic con job on the general citizenry – in other words, take an unpleasant yet routine illness that doesn’t actually kill that many people and make it look like one of those global genocidal outbreaks you see (and only see) in the movies – then you need to do the following:

Engage in a persistent dissemination of falsified, poorly defined  or unreliable statistics and alarming and frequently contradictory false reports mixed with contradictory, confusing and shifting instructions or “advice”. This will create a smoke screen of complexity and confusion that bewilders the citizenry and bedevils their efforts to analyse what they are being told and understand what is happening.

Hit them with this and enough shocks of the bad or alarming news variety and, theoretically, you produce a herd-like compliance.

This is a basic psychological warfare principle, expressed for instance by psychiatrist William Sargent of the Tavistock psychological warfare based London:

“Various types of belief can be implanted in many people, after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger or excitement. Of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgement and heightened suggestibility.  Its various group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of “herd instinct,” and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics, and in all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility.”- from Tavistock Institute psychiatrist Dr. William Sargant’s 1957 book, Battle for the Mind [emphases added]

This is what the government and the MSM, dancing in concert upon the string of as yet not fully identified puppet masters, have done in an effort to pull off what is probably the biggest con job in history.

Unfortunately for them, it hasn’t worked as well as they hoped it would and by the looks of it is now turning into a debacle or rout.It hasn’t worked because they miscalculated. They underestimated people. They underestimated people on many levels but thee primary error was to think of them as a herd, as cattle, to be manipulated on a push-button, stimulus-response basis.

These malicious Utopian tinkerers, nation-wrecking crews and manipulative slime balls are about to find out the hard way that there is MUCH more to people than they kidded themselves into believing.

About now, for instance, there is hardly anyone so asleep that they have not realised they have been lied to about . . . well, just about everything.

We were lied to about hospital admissions “with COVID19” so as to grossly inflate the numbers. This article [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/08/20/coronavirus-hospital-admissions-inflated-height-pandemic-investigation] in The Telegraph explains how that was done.

Also in The Telegraph – which incidentally emerges from this orchestrated con job as the UK newspaper still in possession of some integrity – is this excellent article by Allison Pearson on August 19th [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/sitting-comfortably-not-six-oclock-news]. It is written as a a satire but the facts and stats in it, which I have highlighted in bold appear to be pretty much correct

Are you sitting comfortably? This is Not the Six O’Clock News

With the broadcast media’s coronavirus pessimism continuing apace, it’s time for some satire to lighten the mood

You probably won’t hear this anywhere else so I want to tell you that it’s safe. Safe to go to the beach, safe to have tea with your friends, safe to meet up with your family. Not absolutely 100 percent safe, of course; nothing is. Yes, the virus may come back in the winter. But for the next few weeks, Gather ye roadside punnets of strawberries and have a G&T in the pub garden while ye may!

The broadcast media, which did such a good job of creating fear in the population, continues to be relentless in its pessimism. Just imagine what it would be like if they allowed the true picture to emerge:

It’s the BBC Six O’Clock News and Health Editor Hugh Pym is updating Sophie Raworth on the Covid-19 pandemic.

Sophie: So, Hugh, we’ve seen another rise in cases today?

Hugh: Yes, Sophie, there were 1,040 reported daily cases in England and Wales.

Sophie: Gosh, that’s quite an uptick.

Hugh: Well, it sounds a lot, Sophie, but we have to bear in mind that we are testing a lot more people so we are going to find more evidence of infection. Over 122,000 tests were processed, the most ever in a single day – 1,000 positives out of 122,000 tests is really very small.

Sophie: Still, it’s a major cause for concern generally?

Hugh: Well, not really. The PCR test is not totally reliable. It’s coming up with quite a lot of false positives. What the viewers probably don’t realise is the test can detect remnants of the virus. So someone who had Covid back in July, say, could be recorded today as a positive test, but he or she is now fully recovered.

Sophie (checking her notes): But we do have the very real threat of more local lockdowns in places like Bedford because there are these spikes in Covid cases?

Hugh (sighs): Well, they’re not really spikes, Sophie. A lot of healthy younger people are getting Covid now and they don’t have any symptoms at all. They don’t even know they’ve been infected. But if they test positive they’re added to the list. But a positive test really only becomes a “case” when someone gets sick enough that they need to be admitted to hospital.

Sophie: And how many cases are being admitted to hospital, Hugh?

Hugh (looks sheepish): Not very many to be honest with you.

Sophie: But we’re still in the middle of a global pandemic?

Hugh: Ah, but are we? There are 141,000 hospital beds in England, Sophie. Today, just 599 of those beds are occupied by patients with Covid-19.

Sophie: You’re kidding me!

Hugh: No, I’m not. We have 1,257 hospitals in total so rather a large number of hospitals don’t have a single Covid case.

Sophie: So why aren’t hospitals fully open to non-Covid patients, Hugh?

Hugh: That’s a really good question, Sophie. Could some NHS managers be saving money by keeping wards closed? The Department of Health doesn’t have a clue what’s going on, as per usual. And, of course, a lot of doctors have been working from home in the south of France and they can’t get back because of the quarantine.

Sophie (frantically consults notes): What about the deaths, though, Hugh? They’re really really bad.

Hugh: Sorry to disappoint, but NHS England reported just two Covid-related hospital deaths today. Wales and Scotland haven’t had any Covid deaths for quite some time. In fact, deaths in the UK have been below average for the past seven weeks now. It’s starting to look like deaths in 2020 will be no higher than they were in 2019.

Sophie: Then how could the Government possibly justify keeping all the social distancing measures and imposing lockdowns?

Hugh: Er… I think they’re worried that if they tell the public the truth it will be hard to regain control.

Read more by Allison Pearson here

As you read the above, bear in mind  two things:

We already know the “deaths” stat is fiddled to such a degree we cannot be sure whether on any one day ANYONE AT ALL was killed by COVCID19. Here is just one example of the fiddling: a screen shot from a government website on a day when deaths were reported as 55.

It suggests that, if I have interpreted it correctly, in England if a person tested positive for a Coronavirus (of which there are many including the common cold and not just the COVID19 one)) at ANY TIME in the past and then dies, he is counted on the CV death stat regardless of what actually killed him

If true, that renders the daily death stat meaningless because we don’t know if the number includes ANY COVID19 deaths at all! It might be none of the 55, it might be all of them. All it tells us is some people died.

We now know for sure that the hospital admissions -a suitably scary number vital for conveying the idea  that thousands are being struck down by a killer virus that stalks the land – has been systematically and continually falsified, again thanks to the proper journalists at The Telegraph. Here are a few quotes from that article. The whole thing is well worth a read.

“Hospital admissions for Covid-19 were over-reported at the peak of the pandemic, with patients who were taken in for other illnesses being included in outbreak statistics, it has emerged.

An investigation for the Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) found that people were being counted as Covid hospital admissions if they had ever had the virus, and were added to those being  admitted directly due to it.

Government figures show that, at the peak of the pandemic in early April, nearly 20,000 people a week were being admitted to hospital with coronavirus (see graph below), but the true figure is unknown because of the problem with over-counting.”

“The oversight echoes recent problems with the data for Covid-19 deaths, in which it emerged that thousands of people who died of other causes were being included in coronavirus statistics if they had once tested positive.

Professor Graham Medley, of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, asked by Sage to look into the situation, told The Telegraph: “By June, it was becoming clear that people were being admitted to hospital for non-Covid reasons who had tested positive many weeks before.”

“…[T]he miscalculation was particularly concerning because the number had been used to reflect the current state of the virus epidemic.”

“…Sage minutes record that Government scientists registered concern that non-Covid patients were being included in the outbreak data.”

“So, we saw with the death statistics, that initially a ‘Covid death’ was defined as any death in which the person had previously tested positive.

“The same is true, but even more so, for hospital admissions. In order to capture all the potential manifestations of the disease at the start of the epidemic, all admissions of people who had tested positive were counted as ‘Covid-related admissions’.”

“The over-count may have included patients admitted with an unrelated ailment but who tested positive for coronavirus on arrival, or who had previously been diagnosed with the virus. It may also include patients who were tested while already in hospital for a different condition.”

“It is also still unclear how many people included in current admissions data are asymptomatic and were tested when in hospital for a different condition, or who had caught the disease once they were in hospital.

“Prof Heneghan said it was possible that in hotspot areas, such as Oldham (see video below), there was now nobody in hospital with an active infection, but it was impossible to tell from the way the data was being recorded.”

And while the government continues to try to talk up this fake epidemic – presumably in a desperate effort to make itself right for having inflicted extensive damage on the economy – it is important to remember that while, per the stats below, we currently have 70 or so people in  critical care “with Covid” and admissions “with Covid” reported a around 70 or so , there are over 1200 hospitals in the UK, so that is roughly over 17 hospitals per patient!

The source for these graphs is here

Enough said.

A great deal of economic and social damage has been inflicted on our country, “justified” by grossly falsified statistics.

These are the actions on an enemy on a par with an act of war.

There just remains for us to do two things:

  • Repair the damage done
  • Bring the perpetrators to justice.

Related Articles

On Shocks, propaganda and steering the herd

Wars, epidemics and mass suggestibility

The WHO, a terrorist, a globalist and the Tavistock psychological warfare connection

Anxiety and suggestibility – the keys to manipulation

Programming the herd – how we are being played by propaganda

In a Nutshell: UK Government allies with psychopharmacy front groups


The above article was featured  on  UK Reloaded 

   

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/herd-immunity-or-herd-mentality/

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail