Why Lockdowns Are Genocide (Depopulation): Details From A Dozen Countries

2 July, 2020 by 

The reference here is a stunning May 23 article by John Pospichal,Questions for lockdown apologists,” posted at medium.com.

by Jon Rappoport

Pospichal examined overall mortality numbers for Austria, Belgium, Denmark, England and Wales, France, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ecuador, and New York City.

Supported by charts, here are excerpts from his article:

USA Chicago covid-19 lockdowns

“We now have mortality data for the first few months of 2020 for many countries, and, as you might expect, there were steep increases associated with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in each one.”

“Surprisingly, however, these increases did not begin before the lockdowns were imposed, but after. Moreover, in almost every case, they began immediately after. Often, mortality numbers were on a downward trend before suddenly reversing course after lockdowns were decreed.”

“This is an astonishing finding…”

“You will notice that only after each country (or city) was locked down did the increases begin. Moreover, they began immediately, and in nearly every case, precipitously.”

“All this leads us to the following questions, which we pose to all those who continue to defend the use of lockdowns as an effective means to prevent excess deaths.”

“Q: Why was there no significant increase in overall mortality, in any country we have good data for, before the start of lockdowns?”

“Q: Why does a precise and exact correlation exist between the start of lockdowns and significant rises in overall mortality?”

“Q: How is it that governments in every country imposed lockdowns at precisely the same time relative to the future precipitous rise in their populations’ overall mortality rate?”

“Q: How is it, moreover, that this moment in time [i.e., the imposition of lockdowns] happened to fall immediately before that precipitous rise?”

“Q: If health authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which exceeded normal deaths?”

—To that last question, I would respond: No virus would wait. We’re not talking about a virus at all. We’re talking about the sudden effects of the lockdowns.

And those sudden death-effects would come crashing down, first, and immediately, on the most vulnerable people in these countries:

The elderly, who were already ill for years.

THE LOCKDOWNS FORCED THE PREMATURE DEATHS OF OLD PEOPLE.

PEOPLE WHO HAD BEEN SUFFERING FROM MULTIPLE HEALTH CONDITIONS FOR YEARS, WHO HAD BEEN TREATED WITH TOXIC MEDICAL DRUGS, WHOSE IMMUNE SYSTEMS WERE ALREADY SEVERELY COMPROMISED…

AND WHO ARE SUDDENLY TERRIFIED BY TWO MORE FACTORS—THE POSSIBILITY OF A COVID-19 DIAGNOSIS, AND ISOLATION FROM FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THESE TWO FACTORS PUSH THEM OVER THE EDGE AND THEY DIE.

Especially in nursing homes; but also in hospitals, and in their homes.

This is the true face of “COVID.”

This is how the case numbers and the death numbers are being propped up all over the world, to yield the impression of a virus on the loose.

Without those huge numbers, the whole vicious charade of a pandemic would be exposed and rejected at once.

The lockdowns are a method of killing.

The governors and mayors and presidents and prime ministers who imposed the lockdowns — and behind them, the planners of “COVID” — have been killing old people.

Source: https://humansarefree.com/2020/07/lockdowns-are-genocide-depopulation.html

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Responses to “Why Lockdowns Are Genocide (Depopulation): Details From A Dozen Countries”

  1. sovereigntea says:

    Getting rid of your unfunded pension liabilities ?

  2. haraldhadrada1 says:

    Agenda21 and Agenda2030 all going to plan.

    The destruction of Industry is all but complete with the fak Pandemic lockdown.
    Goals of Agenda 21.

    According to the United Nations the following are not sustainable
    Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family
    homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line
    construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.

    https://www.ukcolumn.org/sites/default/files/pdf/your-life-in-their-hands.pdf

    Abolition of private property.
    Mortgage repayments will be impossible
    without a job and no industry, banks will foresclose, own almost all property.
    Mass starvation without farms, reservoirs

    ENGDAHL: “The word sustainable is the keyword. If we dig deeper it is clear it is code-word for a reorganization of world wealth via means such as punitive carbon taxes that will dramatically reduce air and vehicle travel. The less-developed world will not rise to the developed, rather the other way, the advanced civilizations must go down in their living standards to become ‘sustainable.’”
    Now Comes the Davos Global Economy “Great Reset”. What Happens After the Covid-19 Pandemic?
    By F. William Engdahl Global Research, June 10, 2020

    https://www.ukcolumn dot org/sites/default/files/pdf/your-life-in-their-hands.pdf

    We are being taken back to the stoneage.

    Privately owned Central Bankers are printing money out of thin air and buying all stock.

    http://www.24hgold dot com/english/news-gold-silver-fiat-money-in-death-throes.aspx?article=2170303028G10020&redirect=false&contributor=Antal+E.+Fekete

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.