9 Responses to “Surviving Lunatic land.”

  1. sovereigntea says:

    Recall the supermarket shelves depleted of all known cleaning products ?

    Driven by into an OCD cleaning frenzy by a covid propaganda campaign reeking of psychological warfare many lost souls were overexposed to cleaning chemicals. What happened next ?

    https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

    Surface and Object Cleaning

    For the search period from 1946 through October 14, 2018, we identified 2 RCTs and 1 observational study about surface and object cleaning measures for inclusion in our systematic review (40–42). One RCT conducted in day care nurseries found that biweekly cleaning and disinfection of toys and linen reduced the detection of multiple viruses, including adenovirus, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus in the environment, but this intervention was not significant in reducing detection of influenza virus, and it had no major protective effect on acute respiratory illness (41). Another RCT found that hand hygiene with hand sanitizer together with surface disinfection reduced absenteeism related to gastrointestinal illness in elementary schools, but there was no major reduction in absenteeism related to respiratory illness (42). A cross-sectional study found that passive contact with bleach was associated with a major increase in self-reported influenza (40).

  2. sovereigntea says:

    Volume 26, Number 5—May 2020
    Policy Review
    Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures

    In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51–1.20; I2 = 30%, p = 0.25) (Figure 2). One study evaluated the use of masks among pilgrims from Australia during the Hajj pilgrimage and reported no major difference in the risk for laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in the control or mask group (33). Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for 5 months (9,10). The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies (9,10).

    Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids (36). There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.

    In lower-income settings, it is more likely that reusable cloth masks will be used rather than disposable medical masks because of cost and availability (38). There are still few uncertainties in the practice of face mask use, such as who should wear the mask and how long it should be used for. In theory, transmission should be reduced the most if both infected members and other contacts wear masks, but compliance in uninfected close contacts could be a problem (12,34). Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission (39). Thus, education on the proper use and disposal of used face masks, including hand hygiene, is also needed.

    https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

  3. Aldous says:

    First they came for those who refused to distance themselves socially, and I did not speak out—because I distanced myself socially and lost all my friends.

    Then they came for those who refused to stay at home and become mentally ill, and I did not speak out— because I stayed at home and became mentally ill.

    Then they came for those who refused to wear a mask and get physically sick, and I did not speak out—because I wore a mask and got physically sick.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left like me because we had obeyed orders and died.

    • Alan Vaughn says:

      “Then they came for me—and there was no one left like me because we had obeyed orders and died.”
      They’re not dead yet. We can still waken the dazed sheeple from their fear induced stupor and reset their befuddled brains with the truth and why they MUST stand up to this tyranny, or we all die.

      • Aldous says:

        Hi Alan.
        Honestly, I’ve tried telling sheeple friends what is happening and what the awful and inconvenient truth is but it’s usually a total waste of time.
        They will not be woken up and you just have to forget them.

  4. Aldous says:

    I just had a truly terrifying thought.
    Are some (or ALL) of these mask wearers wearing them in BED – or (shudder the thought) when they go to the BATHROOM!
    Seriously.
    I only ask because my long suffering wife has just commented that she has never been made love to by someone wearing a UK policeman’s helmet(!?) – or a present day COVID-19 mask.
    She’s a pervert BTW.

  5. Alan Vaughn says:

    Hi Aldous,
    Yes unfortunately you’re not wrong.
    I just tried in vain to post a long reply, but it always disappears. I even tried to break it down into 2 separate posts, but didn’t work either. They just vanish into thin air after clicking ‘Submit Comment’ button.. Damn it.

  6. tapnewswiremember says:

    https://www.carolinestephens.net/post/the-mask
    https://archive.is/5Bdu3

    The Mask

    KNOW THE LAW!

    Remember, according to social distancing, shop staff cannot “touch” you or come within 1 metre without breaking guidelines, (but of course they touch everything you’re buying) and if you refuse to wear a mask in their shop they cannot physically throw you out, but can only call the police to enforce a government ‘guideline’. The big problem for the police is that that would be breaking the Law if they tried to enforce a ‘guideline’, because police can only legally enforce Criminal Law.

    If the police detain you, or arrest you because, naturally, you have refused to cooperate, they are then guilty of unlawful detention, which comes under the criminal code of ‘kidnapping’.

    If they try to fine you, without first ‘kidnapping’ you, you are not obliged to give them any information, not even your name, and without your name they cannot issue a fine.

    If they find out your name, by whatever means and then issue a fine, you can simply state that you refuse to accept or pay any fine and they will then be obliged to caution you, which would be totally illegal since you will not have committed any crime (guidelines being optional to follow) and again, they would not be enforcing any law.

    Know the difference: Guidelines come under ‘civil law’ and crimes come under ‘criminal law’. The police are not allowed to enforce ‘civil law’ – only the local authority and the civil courts can attempt to do that. So, demand that the Court issue you with a date for an appearance, and when/if you go to court your defence will be illegal detention and kidnapping, and in the civil court you will be able to demand substantial compensation as a counter-claim from the police, plus insist that criminal charges are brought against the arresting and detaining officers.

    Now, nobody says that it will get to that stage, indeed it would be very unlikely to, but can you imagine how the Courts will be clogged up for years, perhaps decades, trying to process those bloody awkward bastards who had the bald-faced cheek to know the Law and also know their civil rights.

    PS: Ensure you use your phone and record the whole even, to be used as leverage and evidence. But just remember this one fact – the police cannot enforce civil Law and therefore have no rights in determining whether or not you have to wear a mask, just because the government says so. That process would be called a ‘dictatorship’ and we are not quite there yet, despite this government’s valiant attempts to make it so.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.