Genetic engineering on humans under false flags

The vaccine industry and politics want to change us genetically because of Covid-19

 by Wolfgang Wodarg, June 12, 2020

If you still want to give us a corona “vaccination”, you may know something about molecular biology or business, but look away when it comes to health.

And if you want to convince us that you have to suppress our freedoms until there is a vaccination, you are probably a specialist in suppression, but not in prevention.

So that as many as possible can make informed decisions again without the panic pressure, it should be explained what the proposed measures are about, how they work and what risks they involve. Given the importance of this topic for us and future generations, political recommendations should not be left out.

Precautionary principle – was there something there?

What was scolded and protested when Monsanto & Co. genetically modified the seeds. The protest against genetically modified organisms, i.e. plants, animals and microorganisms, was an integral part of many party programs. Especially with the greens and greenish wings of other parties. There have been huge protests against the release of such GMOs, and everything from world hunger to bee death has been done to provide political resistance. (3)

But what happened if even a Greens party leader now threatened the population with forced genetic manipulation, shouldn’t they voluntarily endure this? How is it that only because of a highly questionable medical precaution against an annually recurring flu virus has the long-established vaunted precautionary principle in the EU suddenly lost sight of not only the Greens but the majority of those responsible?

About genes, viruses and hosts

The genome or genome is often represented with a double helix, through which the species-specific information is passed on and varied from generation to generation in many living beings. Of course it’s not that simple. Genes are summarized in a very abstract way, with the help of which our cellular identity is continuously reorganized and adapted in its environment.

Most people now know that there are also manifestations of life that are identifiable but e.g. B. contain only a single-stranded sequence of core acids (RNA) – such as the corona viruses. These viruses are parasites that sneak into host cells and cause them to multiply . The genetic sequence of the virus in the infected host cell takes the helm and, in order to generate duplicate viruses, loots its content so that it dies.

Other viruses remain hidden in cells for a long time until they let their copies swarm out again. The argument about whether viruses are living organisms is idle and a question of perspective, because all living organisms (even humans), like viruses, cannot multiply without a suitable environment.

 

Infection – a regulated defense response to the formation and maintenance of identity

Every virus infection is actually a natural genetic change in the target cells. The difference to the planned genetic manipulation is, however, huge, because an infection is, as I said, associated with a virus multiplication and with a multi-layered defense reaction at the local, humoral and cellular level. Even the infected own cells are recognized and destroyed and cleared by the intact immune system by so-called killer cells.

We call these regulated defense reactions of our body inflammation. We feel them as symptoms and can therefore immediately support our body and our fellow human beings through our behavior in such a crisis. It is a natural and necessary discussion, an interaction regulated by complex communication processes.

The infection process has been perfected in our ancestors for millennia and is part of the common natural development of host and virus. (For immunological details , I recommend the easy-to-understand article by Professor Dr. Beda M. Stadler   from Bern.)

The mutation from vaccinations

Vaccine development was initially carried out by the state and solely from public funds.

For example, smallpox was eradicated and polio, tetanus and diphtheria were largely suppressed. However, there was a complete paradigm shift when vaccination was deregulated from a burden of general interest to a business idea by pharmaceutical companies. For about two generations, the state has only been able to make sure that industry doesn’t do anything harmful to us anymore. But even this is made more difficult by a greedy industry, whose primary interest is not health, but profit, due to corrupting influences on regulatory and health authorities and, increasingly, also on politics. And since the invention of “Pandemic Preparedness”

Virologists who are directly or indirectly dependent on the bio-tech industry have taken on the role of generating fear of hostile pathogens at shorter and shorter intervals. In this “fight against viruses”, the “war correspondents” help companies with cooperating mainsteam media, which stir up the necessary fear and political pressure. They repeatedly create a public mood, under the influence of which our governments have been repeatedly blackmailed (or even encouraged?) To ignore all critical voices and to buy large quantities of the drugs or vaccines that the profiteers have quickly cobbled together.

Planned “vaccinations” change us genetically

Of the approximately 100 “vaccines against Covid-19” currently being developed in the competition, 12 are already in clinical trials. According to information from the WHO on June 9th, four of these contain recombinant RNA and three candidates DNA. Only a minority are conceived as a conventional vaccine. Seven of these twelve candidates therefore have nothing in common with vaccination, but are genetic engineering changes in humans that sail under the false flag. Therefore “vaccination” is put in quotation marks.

These are fragments of different genetic information that are to be brought into human cells as RNA (4) or DNA (5) in likewise different ways (6).

Recombinant RNA, which is introduced into human cells, also changes the genetic processes there and can be classified as a genetic modification of the cells or the organism, because genetic modification is not limited to a direct change in DNA. However, the recombinant RNA introduced into the cells should not multiply as the viruses do. It is also not part of the practiced cellular communication and abuses existing defense routines such as private security services by a police station.

That can be what should not be

Humans will be genetically modified by the planned “vaccinations”, even if the legislature has excluded the use of this term for humans themselves when defining GMOs (1). This was done to avoid human rights opposition, although equal interference in animals would lead to this label. People are already genetically modified in special cases. Such changes run as “gene therapy” (2) and are subject to high legal hurdles ( eg Zolgensma ).

Furthermore, there is always the risk of artificial genetic modifications that these could also include the germ cells. A germline change, i.e. inheritable genetic modifications have so far been taboo under human rights. The participants in the clinical trial of the new genetic “vaccines” must therefore also commit themselves to strict measures to prevent pregnancy.

In the case of the “gene vaccinations” imposed on us by scaremongering, a lobby also ensured in good time that the planned mass use of recombinant genetic information in humans would not be referred to as “gene therapy or gene prophylaxis” to improve acceptance, although it is natural.

Our cells are designed to replace the bioreactors in the vaccine industry

Some of the planned or already ongoing clinical studies are interfering with the genetic processes of cell-internal communication, so that our body cells themselves produce new substances that were previously supplied by vaccines from outside. Our cells are to be reprogrammed into bioreactors for internal vaccine production.

Vaccines are no longer to be produced on chicken embryos or in technical bioreactors, but from our own body cells.

To do this, you have to genetically modify our cells. You have to inject genetic program codes into our cells so that they create something strange in us that our immune system should then defend against. Our immune system is to be trained and sensitized to possible pathogens against the previously programmed material characteristics. So the ideology.

Big risks and open questions

But what happens when these immune cells are recognized and destroyed by our immune cells like an infection? What happens if cells are changed unplanned in important organs, for example in the liver, and these are then severely damaged by a strong cellular defense reaction? What happens if this happens in many places in the body and a dangerous cytokine storm is triggered?

This leaves further important questions (6) open:

  1. Which cells are ultimately controlled and changed by the shuttle viruses or nano-particles?
  2. How accurate and tissue or cell specific is the shuttle process?
  3. Does our cellular defense recognize the modified cells as foreign and destroy them, as it does with the cells infected with viruses, for example?
  4. How does our immune system differentiate between infected and modified cells in the event of infection?
  5. Does this process trigger a self-limiting reaction, or can mass cell death (apoptosis) with a cytokine storm and shock reactions be triggered?
  6. How long must the effects of such manipulation be followed up in order to rule out autoimmune reactions or tumor induction?
  7. How thoroughly have such serious risks been investigated through extensive animal testing?
  8. Why is there a very limited and strict indication for gene therapeutics, whereas an “accelerated procedure” is permitted for the genetic modifications examined to prevent infection?

Conventional “pandemic” vaccines also bring increased risks

Regardless of the genetically modulating methods, several classic vaccines are also being tested. In these, different inactivated virus components are supplied from the outside, which should lead directly to the formation of antibodies. Some of the candidates also contain potentiators or adjuvants.

With these vaccines, too, risks are to be accepted due to the alleged time pressure, which may arise from contamination by proteins from the nutrient cells of bioreactors. In the shadow of the scaremongering, the companies are granted a much too short observation period. Protein residues from bioreactor cells can very well occur as contaminants in vaccine batches and cause cellular reactions or even cancer-like growth. In order to exclude this, long observation periods are required.

The addition of potentiators (adjuvants) is intended to enhance the immunizing effect of the antigens. However, it is unspecific and can trigger severe autoimmune diseases, as have also been observed with swine flu vaccines.

Flu shot – the annual business with hope

In addition, it remains questionable for all methods whether induced immunization leads to a protective effect in the case of the constantly recombining coronaviruses. This can only be assessed after a flu season / corona season.

So the flu vaccination / corona vaccination remains an annual good business with hope, because in this “business” something can only be said retrospectively about the benefits.

In addition, there is now enough experience that the space occupied by vaccines suppressed viruses by other (more dangerous?) Pathogens . Because even an influenza vaccination does not prevent respiratory diseases , it only changes the pathogen spectrum! That would be no different with a corona component or the planned genetic manipulations.

Brake irresponsible hazards and take responsibility!

So if you want to sell us such a corona “vaccination”, you may know something about molecular biology or about business, but look away when it comes to health.

And if you want to convince us that you have to suppress our freedoms until there is a vaccination, you are probably a specialist in suppression but not in prevention.

In any case, it is already completely irresponsible for the responsible governments to promise that the vaccine industry will be released from liability . This invites you to neglect the precautionary principle, which is so often invoked, and makes the vaccine industry a responsible zone, in which speculators and virological hazard watchers are already romping around.

It is gross abuse of entrusted power if ethics committees or the heads of state control authorities obey everything obediently, while Ms. Merkel or Ms. van der Leyen let the vaccine industry gamblers, some of whom have been convicted, with billions of euros in support of the population out of political calculation.

The fish stinks from the head

Highly qualified scientists work at the RKI, the PEI, the BfArM or the EMA, who have to watch and keep silent, because otherwise they are threatened existentially, as can be seen from the whistleblower from the Ministry of the Interior.

Yes, it is the corruption of science by politics and business! We are experiencing a time of institutional corruption, an anonymous corruption that fears fear, that is more dangerous than any virus and that has robbed many people of their livelihood in recent months and has also cost many people their lives.

10 demands with regard to measures of drug infection prophylaxis:

  1. Immediate stop of clinical studies with recombinant RNA or DNA in humans
  2. Immediate stop of lockdown measures regardless of possible vaccines.
  3. No blackmail due to proof of immunity
  4. Maximum patient data protection also with regard to the immune status
  5. No acceptance guarantees or exemptions from liability for biotechnological companies, the pharmaceutical industry or cooperating service providers
  6. No potentiators or risky adjuvants in vaccines
  7. No business secrets in vaccine manufacturing
  8. 100% transparency of all documents and results in connection with clinical studies for vaccines
  9. 100% transparency of all documents of clinical studies for the prevention and treatment of diseases, which are regulated in the IFSG
  10. Complete transparency and access to files in the protocols and documents of ethics committees in clinical studies on drug or immunological infection prophylaxis or vaccine testing

Hints:

(1) Genetic Engineering Act: Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) A GMO is an organism, with the exception of humans, whose genetic material has been modified in a way that does not occur under natural conditions through crossing or natural recombination.

(2) EU Directive 2009/120, 2.1 Gene therapy : A gene therapy is a biological medicine that has the following characteristics:

  1. a) It contains an active ingredient which contains or consists of a recombinant nucleic acid which is used or administered in humans in order to regulate, repair, replace, add or remove a nucleic acid sequence.
  2. b) Its therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic effect is directly related to the recombinant nucleic acid sequence which it contains, or to the product which results from the expression of this sequence.

Infectious disease vaccines are not gene therapeutics.

(3) See my report on GMOs for the Council of Europe

(4) With the RNA A lot of data on the security profile is still missing. In addition to local or systemic immune reactions similar to those of conventional vaccinations, it should be observed how the expressed immunogens, i.e. the antigens that trigger the immune response, are distributed in the body and whether they may persist. It is also unclear whether the modified, non-native nucleotides have toxic effects. A small inaccuracy of the RNA vaccine can lead to the fact that the “vaccination” leads to the triggering of the disease or greatly increases it. All of this has not been sufficiently researched. It should also be borne in mind that, depending on the route of application, RNA is introduced into the extracellular space. Extracellular RNA is known to be a factor in coagulation and tissue permeability. (Source: Stefan Hockertz)

 (5)  For DNA vaccines , the DNA sequence of the desired antigen is inserted into a bacterial plasmid. After the vaccine is injected, the plasmid is taken up and read in the target cell; the foreign antigen is to be produced there. Some DNA vaccines get into the target cell by electroporation. Short electrical impulses at the moment of intramuscular vaccination ensure that the cell membranes become permeable to the foreign DNA. DNA vaccines typically require strong adjuvants to trigger an effective immune response. So far, DNA vaccines have only been approved in veterinary medicine. A conceivable disadvantage is the accidental integration of plasmid DNA into the genome of the host: the integration could induce increased tumor formation due to activation of oncogenes or deactivation of tumor suppressor genes, or cause autoimmune diseases (e.g. lupus erythematosus). (Source: Stefan Hockertz)

(6)  The questions raised in the text are answered by the immunologist Prof. Stefan Hockertz as follows:

  1. Which cells are ultimately controlled and changed by the shuttle viruses or nano-particles? UNKNOWN
  2. How accurate and tissue or cell specific is the shuttle process? NOT AT ALL. LIPOSOMES TRIED AND DECEASED FOR DECADES
  3. Does our cellular defense recognize the modified cells as foreign and destroy them, as it does with the cells infected with viruses, for example? THE DANGER IS BIG.
  4. How does our immune system differentiate between infected and modified cells in the event of infection? NOT AT LEAST, THE INFECTION CAN BE MAKE UP.
  5. Does this process trigger a self-limiting reaction, or can mass cell death (apoptosis) with a cytokine storm and shock reactions be triggered? THESE ARE RESEARCH APPROACHES WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  6. How long must the effects of such manipulation be followed up in order to rule out autoimmune reactions or tumor induction? AT LEAST 2 YEARS
  7. How thoroughly have such serious risks been investigated through extensive animal testing? ALSO 2 YEARS AT LEAST, ESPECIALLY IF IT WERE FARM.
  8. Why is there a very limited and strict indication for gene therapeutics, whereas an “accelerated procedure” is permitted for the genetic modifications examined to prevent infection? THIS IS PURE POLICY AND DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING REGULATORY POINTS.

https://www.wodarg.com/impfen/

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.