Carbon/CO2 climate theory is nonsense

Is CO2 is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouses pay to produce it?

If CO2 was so terrible for the planet, then installing a CO2 generator in a greenhouse would kill the plants. But scientists and even governments actually recommend supplementing CO2 in greenhouses in order to boost plant growth and food production.

“The benefits of carbon dioxide supplementation on plant growth and production within the greenhouse environment have been well understood for many years,” says the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food.

“CO2 increases productivity through improved plant growth and vigour. Some ways in which productivity is increased by CO2 include earlier flowering, higher fruit yields, reduced bud abortion in roses, improved stem strength and flower size. Growers should regard CO2 as a nutrient… increasing the CO2 level to 1,000 ppm will increase the photosynthesis by about 50% over ambient CO2 levels.”

In fact, as recent scientific studies have shown, the slight rise in CO2 levels of the atmosphere has actually helped re-green deserts and arid areas, accelerating the growth of trees, shrubs and grasses which produce the oxygen human needs to breathe.

Attacking carbon dioxide is hate speech against Mother Nature

The more you really examine the scientific truth about carbon dioxide rather than the politically-charged “hate speech” against Mother Nature being spewed by people like Al Gore, the more you realize CO2 is a crucial nutrient for the Earth’s environment and ecosystem. In fact, the vast majority of all the CO2 released into the atmosphere is produced by Mother Nature via animals in the ocean. Anyone who criticizes CO2 is attacking ocean life and condemning trillions of aquatic creatures who exhale carbondioxide as part of their natural respiration. (Should they all be fined?)

As a society interested in reforestation, expanding the diversity of plant life, nourishing trees and re-greening deserts, we should no longer tolerate anyone engaged in hate speech against Mother Nature and CO2. Those who attempt to demonize this critical nutrient for the planet are engaged in a kind of hate-motivated racism against plants.

If it’s not okay to condemn someone for being black, why is it okay for people like Al Gore to engage in endless hate speech against all the living beings that are green?

Besides, all those people who keep sounding the alarm on CO2 are being too negative all the time. Nobody spews more doom and gloom than Al Gore and the global warming crowd who paint apocalyptic pictures of Earth’s future if we all don’t start paying carbon taxes to the super rich. Stop being so negative!

They need to practice more positivity and repeat to themselves affirmations like:

“CO2 is a nutrient for forests.”

“CO2 is produced by ocean life.”

“CO2 brings balance to the global ecosystem.”

“CO2 is to plants as oxygen is to humans.”

“CO2 can help transform barren deserts into sustainable forests.”

Perhaps by staying positive, the global warming fearmongers and doom-and-gloomers can calm down, take a few breaths (with extra CO2) and recognize that what’s good for plants is good for the planet.

In fact, I’m going to hyperventilate after writing this article just to generate a little extra CO2 for the world. It’s my gift to Al Gore.

TAP
Paid for science is next to useless and as most scientists depend of corporate funding, most of them are useless.  There are self funded scientists like David Dubyne of Adapt 2030 on Youtube.  At least there you can find some climate truth.  It’s not a nice truth but you might as well worry about the solar minimum happening right now and freezing the planet, as the nonsense from government about warming and so on.  The warm period is over.  It was caused by the sun not humanity.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Responses to “Carbon/CO2 climate theory is nonsense”

  1. pete fairhurst says:

    More on Grand Solar Minimum

    https://watchers.news/2018/03/30/study-suggests-modern-grand-solar-minimum-in-2020-2053/

    I think that cooling would be far far worse than warming

  2. pete fairhurst says:

    I posted a much more extensive reply to your comment “The warm period is over. It was caused by the sun not humanity.” Tap. 4 times, but each time it disappeared.

    I totally agree and I have 2 major concerns about the current paradigm:

    1 the Global Warming guff cult is an obvious distraction, it gets all the media attention. Those that rely on the corrupt main media don’t seem to notice all the other environmental disasters happening NOW, not at the end of the century. The media rarely mentions them. Things like plastic pollution, pesticide pollution, fertiliser pollution, electromagnetic pollution, pharmaceutical pollution, endocrine distrupters, the list is endless. But nobody notices because they are fixating on the Global Warming cult

    2 the totalitarian nature of the warming cultists solutions. They want more power over us than the third reich ever had over Germans……. They want to control every aspect of our lives. They should be opposed by all means possible

  3. pete fairhurst says:

    And there is the money too of course, always the money. It will be a truly massive money spinner for the usual suspects. See here:

    “Climate and the money trail”

    http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO25Sept2019.php

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.