Titanic parallels with 911

In the 1970s, the British Gov allowed Lloyd’s to move its assets offshore, avoiding taxes. Only the fact that the same people that owned Lloyd’s also owned the British Gov can explain that. Lloyd’s immediately became a tax shelter, and all sorts of new fraud was encouraged—which Wikipedia admits.

This is also admitted in the Sasse scandal story of the 1970s, which somehow came to light. There, it is admitted that the “risks written were rigged: typically dilapidated buildings in slums such as New York’s south Bronx, which soon burned down after being insured for large sums.” That just proves that insurance companies can be involved in precisely that sort of scam, and we must assume it worked by part of the money being kicked back to the insurers. They also admit it worked by targeting minor underwriters in the syndicate, who were told they were responsible for the losses. In the mainstream stories, they pretend that head underwriter Dennis Harrison was not an approved underwriter of Lloyd’s, instead being a mafioso who had fooled the Society somehow, but that is just cover. Anyway, it looks like this came to light due to lawsuits by these minor underwriters, who figured out they were being scammed. But they were only partly successful, only lowering their losses

page12image3867129488page12image3867130080page12image3867130416

by about 55%. Amazingly, Lloyd’s itself dodged blame. And the major underwriters dodged scrutiny, we may assume by owning the courts. This is because after 1911, Lloyd’s was basically a ghost. Legally, it didn’t exist at all, except as a name. Legally, the individual underwriters shouldered all the financial responsibility, so “the Society” was untouchable. In court, “the Society” disappeared into a London fog.

A similar thing happened in the late 80s with the Piper Alpha oil rig explosion. Through re-insurance, many minor underwriters were exposed multiple times, and a large number were destroyed. This of course links us to my paper on the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster, where I suggested it may have been a fake as well. No doubt this was another chance for insurance fraud, though I haven’t read anything about it.

Tellingly, Lloyd’s was also involved in insuring the Twin Towers on 911, and they are among the ones who paid out to Larry Silverstein. This of course gives us a whole new twist on that event, one given little time up to this point. I don’t know that anyone has suggested the insurers were involved in that fraud, so let me be the first. I beg you to notice how much that event looks like the Titanic event, from the point of both the insured and the insurer. It has previously been suggested that a main point of the 911 event was to get rid of buildings that were no longer profitable, didn’t meet code, and couldn’t be brought up to code without ruinous losses. It has been shown that Larry Silverstein made a huge profit from the event, but it was never shown why the insurers didn’t properly investigate, finding what private “conspiracy” investigators discovered very quickly without that much effort. Since Lloyd’s has an extensive Intelligence gathering department, it should look odd that it failed to discover these things, and never brought any of the anomalies up in court. Also notice that 911 not only looks like a later clone of the Titanic event, it also looks like an analogue of the event described above in the Sasse scandal, where “risks written were rigged: typically dilapidated buildings in slums such as New York’ssouth Bronx, which soon burned down after being insured for large sums.” Don’t the Twin Towers now look like just a larger version of the same con?

You will say I have no proof Lloyd’s was involved in either 911 or the Titanic hoax, which is true enough. Everything I have presented is circumstantial, and stands only as a suggestion. However, my line of reasoning here is pretty obvious. I saw and wrote all this in less than 24 hours, so it didn’t take much research to come to this conclusion. It only required I follow a line of pretty obvious clues. No doubt anyone who cared to could make a strong case with more work, and the governors only consolation is that it appears no one cares to do stuff like this. The minor insurers of the Titanic are long dead, and their ancestors have no reason to reopen the case. The lawsuits of 911 are over as well, and since no minor underwriters got a sniff of the fraud there, it is doubtful they will read this paper and have any light turn on. So it all may appear academic. Which is fine with me: I have not been hired by the defense or the prosecution, and I am just here to solve the case for my own edification, as you probably are. Yes, this will further discourage me from buying insurance, but since I don’t own any of any kind, that is pretty meaningless as well. I had already decided insurance was a scam before I discovered any of this today, so this won’t change my beliefs at all. Besides, I don’t believe in betting against myself. All insurance is a bet against yourself, and therefore it is tempting Fate and bad Karma.

While I am here I might as well return to the Wiki page on the Titanic, to see if I can tease any more information out of it. Everything I look at these days tends to crumble into a pile of salt, so I guess I should continue to do my thing. The first thing I notice is Gladys (Millvina) Dean, alleged to be the last survivor of the Titanic. She was 2 months old in April of 1912.

page13image3945493952page13image3945494288page13image3945494560

page14image3948150960

First of all, the name Gladys Dean indicates she was probably Jewish. Her page has several anomalies, the first being that her mother was 33 in 1912. The second is that her brother Bertram allegedly died on April 14, the anniversary of the event. The third is that his middle name was Vere, probably linking this family to the de Veres of the peerage. They were the Earls of Oxford, and one was involved in the Shakespeare hoax. The fourth is his first name Bertram, which is another name from the peerage. You would much more likely find the name in first class rather than third class. The fifth is that we are told Millvina and Bertram were raised on pension funds. What pension funds? Their father was allegedly in his thirties, moving to Kansas to co-own a tobacco shop with his cousin. So where does any pension come in? And how could this third-class traveller afford to buy a tobacco shop? The sixth is that Millvina didn’t become involved in Titanic promotion until she was in her 70s. I guess that is because the Titanic wasn’t famous until the 1990s.

[Added October 3: In fact, I later discovered a probable link between this Dean woman and the captain of the Titanic Edward Smith. I have linked Smith to the Smith baronets through the name Melville. In making this link, I found an Abel Smith of that Melville line who married a Calvert in 1826. Her brother, the 2nd Baronet, changed his name from Calvert to Verney, and married the daughter of Admiral Sir George Hope-Vere. We just saw Bertram Vere Dean, brother of Millvina Dean. That indicates Dean and Capt. Smith were closely related, and both from the peerage. They don’t tell you that, do they?]

We are told the Carpathia rescued 705 people from the Titanic, so my guess would be that was all that were ever onboard. Minus 212 crew, that would be 493 passengers, which sounds about right. Since this was a managed event, either the passenger lists were faked, the crew list was faked, or both. TheCarpathia list was probably also faked, since that ship was part of the hoax. It may have picked up more than 705. The Titanic lists could be padded in several ways, which we have seen in more recent hoaxes. They could include people that had recently died from other causes, so we should look for a preponderance of elderly onboard. They could include the names of agents throughout the world who needed to disappear as part of their cover that year. And they could include names simply made up from scratch. These made-up names often include some sort of inside joke.

Further down the page, we have a huge anomaly. Canadian ships were allegedly the first to arrive on the scene after the Carpathia took the survivors away. These Canadian ships were supposed to collect bodies, but there were too many to collect. So Captain Larnder of the Mackay-Bennett decided to preserve the bodies only of first-class passengers, dumping second and third-class passengers and crew

page14image3948406000page14image3948406592page14image3948407200

back into the sea. Of course this makes no sense on any level. What it indicates is that these second and third-class passengers never existed. In fact, there is no proof of their existence, or at least of their deaths. All evidence was conveniently “buried at sea” as usual. Plus, how exactly did Captain Larnder and his men figure out who was from what class? Did they all still have ticket stubs in their pockets after floating for several days in the ocean? Or did he just pull in those wearing tuxedos or top hats? Despite the Canadians only collecting the wealthy-looking, one-third of the bodies were never identified or claimed. Really? One-third of the first-class passengers had no relatives and no one was looking for them? Almost half the bodies gathered (150) were never collected or claimed, and were buried in-masse in Halifax. Again, really? That is what we are expected to believe? Despite picking out only first-class passengers from the floaters, 150 were never claimed and were dumped into a mass grave in Nova Scotia?

Three more bodies from collapsible A were unceremoniously dumped at sea by the RMS Oceanic, with no effort to identify them. The Oceanic didn’t have the lame excuse of the Mackay-Bennett, since she picked up only a dozen survivors. So she couldn’t claim there was no room onboard for three more bodies.

Then we are told that in June, the last support ships were reporting that life jackets were failing, and the last bodies were sinking to the ocean floor. Again, WHAT? We are supposed to believe that not only did Capt Larnder order the bodies to be thrown back in the ocean with their life vests still on, someone ordered all other ships to leave the bodies out there, with no effort at retrieval? Does that make any sense to you? Because these hundreds of bodies were third-class or crew, they were just flotsam? No one was looking for these people or their bodies? There was no outcry in the US or Europe from family members? Just think if this happened today. Do you think hundreds of bodies in life-jackets would be left floating for two months, in the sight of many rescue ships? Of course the fact that no one was looking for these people and no one was raising any outcry in the US indicates these people did not exist. The whole story was manufactured. And yet, despite the absurdity of the story, it is still being sold 106 years later, and I guess most people are buying it.

Next, I tried to access a death list at titanicfacts.net, but was denied access, even to a cached page. So I went instead to the Belfast Telegraph, but it only has a list from A to Pa. So I returned to Wikipedia. The first thing I noticed is that the list does not include Astor’s butler, though he is listed elsewhere. This Victor Robbins is also not listed with second or third-class passengers. Rather, we are told Mrs. Astor had both a maid and a nurse. This is curious since Mrs. Astor had no child. She was only pregnant. So why did she need a nurse? You will say “because she was pregnant. She might need medical care or a midwife.” No, she was in the first stages of pregnancy, not even showing, so there would be no need for a nurse.

The next thing I noticed is that whoever faked this list didn’t like vowels, especially the letter “E”. Statistically, there are far too few surnames starting in vowels, especially in first and second class. Only the letter “A” is representing in anything like a statistical manner. All other vowels are used far too infrequently for this to be a real list.

Another curious thing we find on that page is that some numbers were not used, just so the total could stand at 333. For instance, they skip the numbers 324-5, for no apparent reason.

I encourage my readers to study this list for more anomalies, but I don’t have the stamina for it right now. I want to return to the high profile passengers like Astor. One of these was BenjaminGuggenheim, father of Peggy Guggenheim of the Guggenheim museums. We can be sure he faked his

death. Why? Here’s why: on his page we are told he put his women on lifeboat 9. This was a huge wooden Harland and Wolff lifeboat, with a capacity of 65 people. Wikipedia has very little to tell us about Benjamin Guggenheim’s life, but they are keen to tell us he bravely went down with the ship:

As Aubart and Sägesser reluctantly entered Lifeboat No. 9, Guggenheim spoke to the maid in German, saying, “We will soon see each other again! It’s just a repair. Tomorrow the Titanic will go on again.” Realizing that the situation was much more serious than he had implied, as well as realizing he was not going to be rescued, he then returned to his cabin with Giglio and the two men changed into evening wear.

That is quoted from the New York Times, April 20, 1912. But it turns out it is hogwash, since all he had to do is step on that boat with the women. No one was fighting for the extra seats, not women or children of any class. If we check the stats, there were only 22 people on lifeboat 9, so 43 seats were empty when it lowered. There were four people from first class, 16 from second class, and two from third class. So please tell me why Benny didn’t jump on. He just had a death wish? Of course Guggenheim’s body was never retrieved or identified. Although Capt Larnder pulled 306 first-class- looking bodies out of the water, and although only 118 men from first-class died and 154 from second- class died, he wasn’t able to locate Guggenheim or any of the other important people. Amazing, isn’t it? I guess they thought lifevests didn’t look good with their evening wear.

Which brings us finally to that pesky iceberg. If we study the path of the Titanic, we quickly come to realize she was never far enough north to hit an iceberg in mid-April.

She wasn’t taking the polar route, was she? No, as you can see, the Titanic site is at about the same latitude as New York City or Madrid, Spain, or Rome, Italy. The exact latitude is given as 41.7° north. New York City is at 40.4. Have you ever spotted an iceberg off the coast of New York in April? I didn’t think so. How about Boston? No. Also remember that the Gulfstream is warm, and it moves north in the North Atlantic. You may wish to visit the Wiki page on Gulfstream, where you will see this lovely graphic:

page16image3949013776

page17image3949154400

The subtext there is:

Surface temperatures in the western North Atlantic. The North American landmass is black and dark blue (cold), while the Gulf Stream is red (warm). Source: NASA

NASA tells us: Warm. More research tells us red is 25°C, yellow is 20, green is 15. Even at green, that is a water surface temperature of almost 60°F. 25°C is 77°F. Hello! Are you awake? Ships follow the Gulfstream across the Atlantic on purpose, and always have. Check out old Ben Franklin’s map of the Gulfstream, noting how it curves and goes over toward Europe. Also note the little ships on it.

page17image3949123664page17image3949123936page17image3949124208

Ships simply don’t hit icebergs at 41.7 N in mid-April in the Gulfstream. No ship before the Titanic

ever had. And of course the Titanic didn’t either. Only complete idiots would believe such a story. For the Titanic to encounter icebergs in April, it would have had to be hundreds of miles off-course, up north by Newfoundland. There, around the shallow Great Banks of Newfoundland, the Labrador Current comes down and nullifies the warm water of the Gulfstream. But the Titanic wasn’t within 400 miles of that area.

Also return to the NASA graphic. Notice that the waters are actually colder near the coast of New York and Boston than further out where the Titanic was. So if you haven’t seen any icebergs floating around off the coast there in April, you would be even less likely to see them hundreds of miles out.

They actually have an alleged photo of the iceberg that hit the Titanic:

They would need to, wouldn’t they, since all the rescue ships could easily photograph the thing? However, that couldn’t be a more obvious fake. Nothing about it looks real. Even the water looks fake. There is no resolution, lots of fake pixellation or something, and no depth of field. The light also makes no sense. On your far right, the light appears to be coming from low and right, giving us a bright spot on that small wall. But none of the other facets match that reading, telling us this was faked by someone who had never studied light falling on an object. Wikipedia tells us there is a red spot indicating where the Titanic hit it. I see a shadow on the thing, but since the shadow continues on down across the ocean in a line, it can’t be either the mark they are talking about, or real. Regardless, the iceberg doesn’t look large enough to sink the Titanic, surviving with only “a red smudge”. That ship had a displacement of above 50,000 tons and a cruising speed of about 25mph. The force of such a collision could easily split an iceberg that size. The Titanic’s prow was very pointed, remember, and was the most heavily reinforced part of the ship, for obvious reasons. Prows always are, since they will usually take a first hit.

Plus, you have to compare that iceberg to the stories we have been told about the hit. We have many survivor stories, you know. We are told some passengers felt the hit and others didn’t. They were asleep and slept through it. So we are led to believe it was a glancing blow by a submerged iceberg, with the ship just passing over it and being ripped into. If the ship had hit an iceberg much larger than

page18image3951211456

it, as hitting a wall, no one would have slept through it, no one would have survived, and no stories would have been told. If you stop a 50,000 ton object cold from 25mph, the devastation would be enormous, both on the ship and on the iceberg. The iceberg would have pieces of ship buried in for many feet, and other parts would have exploded all over the front of the iceberg. So that photo is justproof the story is false and that we are looking at a huge fake.

We are now told the ship simply nudged the far edge of the iceberg with its starboard side, not puncturing the hull, but only breaking the seams of five outer compartments. The ship could only survive the breach of four, we are told in a bit of irony. However, this conflicts mightily with what we are told of the Titanic’s miraculous design—and why it was considered unsinkable. These outer compartments were sealed off from inner compartments, so pretty much all the outer compartments on the forward starboard could have been breached without sinking the ship. The outer compartments were like bumpers, and they weren’t connected to the inner ship. This “unsinkable” idea is now sold as a myth, but even those selling it as a myth admit that White Star VP Franklin called the ship unsinkable. The publicity brochures for the boat called it unsinkable. So it was hardly a myth. And it was basically true. The Titanic’s twin Olympic was rammed by the 8000 ton military cruiser HMSHawke, crushing the Hawke but never imperiling the Olympic. These huge ships were built to withstand incredible collisions, and the Titanic should have easily withstood the collision, even as it is now sold in the literature. This malarkey about four compartments maximum has no basis in fact: it does not match what was said of these ships before 1912. And besides, if the Titanic hit the right edge of that iceberg above, it would not compromise more than four compartments. It would also not just leave a little red dot on the iceberg. Whoever composed this story is an idiot, or thinks you are.

Plus, where does the “red” come in? The Titanic was red below the water line, but black above, and yet they have indicated a red smudge above the water line on that stupid fake iceberg. I now see it is the dot on the far right wall, in the bright patch, about halfway up. But for the iceberg to be large enough to damage the Titanic, that dot would have to be twenty or thirty feet up—above the water line. So why would it be red?

As a bonus, I include here the images we are given of the Olympic and Hawke after the collision.

page19image3948744432

Strangely, those are fake as well. The picture of the Hawke is obviously a painting: look at the funny little men onboard, and note how the water looks like an impressionist painting! The picture of theOlympic isn’t a painting, but it looks like a manipulated paste-up with fake damage drawn in. If this collision was also a fake, that pushes us down yet another level in the rabbit hole, doesn’t it?

And another part of the story falls with our Gulfstream graphic above. The mainstream admits theCarpathia arrived less than two hours after the Titanic went down. So why couldn’t she rescue the people in lifevests as well as the people in boats? Why did the Canadians have to find them all dead a few days later? We are told they froze to death in less than two hours, but our Gulfstream graphic puts the lie to that as well, doesn’t it? This was 50 or 60 degree F water, which is quite cold but not cold enough to kill you in less than two hours. So the lie here is huge: the mainstream story tells us the water temp was subfreezing, being -2°C or 28°F. Not even close to being true, as we have seen. TheTitanic was traveling in the warm Gulfstream, which was around 15°C almost all the way across the Atlantic. Even the cooler parts of the Atlantic at that latitude aren’t subfreezing on the surface.

Of course the movie Titanic was made to push again all these old lies. We saw Leo DiCaprio freezing to death in icy water in a short time, didn’t we? Impossible, because he would have been floating in NASA’s “warm” Gulfstream at latitude 41.7° N. But they want you to think he was floating at about 60°N, up by Greenland. I am just surprised director Cameron didn’t CGI in some polar bears swimming by.

Actually, this idea was used to sell the event. See Daisy Spedden’s children’s book Polar the Titanic Bear, published in 1994. Spedden was an American heiress who supposedly survived the Titanic and she allegedly wrote the book in 1913 to amuse her 7-year-old son. He allegedly died in a car accident in 1915, boo-hoo, so the book was shelved. It was allegedly found by a relative and published by Little Brown in 1994 and then republished by Scholastic Books in 1998. This by itself indicates we are dealing with another Intel project, since Scholastic Books publishes both Harry Potter and the Hunger Games. The first Potter came out in 1997, the year before Scholastic began pushing this Polar the Titanic Bear rubbish.

Which brings us to the USS Californian, famous for failing to respond to flares seen from the Titanic. Several inquires were made into this, but the only possible answer is that the Californian was ordered to stand down and not to assist. Ordered by whom? By J.P. Morgan, who owned the Leyland Line as well as the White Star Line. Despite both the British and American inquiries finding that theCalifornian could have saved all or most of those who perished in lifevests, the officers were never charged with negligence or any other crime. They were never sued. This also can only be explained by top-down pressure by the billionaires, who wished to bury this part of the story.

We are told the Californian was so close she could see the Titanic and the Titanic could see her. But we are supposed to believe neither ship was able to signal the other. No one thought to wake the sleeping wireless operator on the Californian! Oh, the things they expect you to believe!

The story of the Californian has since been tweaked to sell the story that there was ice in the area, and the ship was stopped due to it. But we have seen that was impossible.

Also interesting to my readers is the name of the captain, Stanley Phillip Lord. His son Stanley Tutton Lord was a banker in Liverpool. This reminds us of agent Sterling Lord, from my paper on theJeffrey MacDonald fake, doesn’t it? I showed Sterling Lord was from the peerage, and we may assume

page20image3950200768page20image3950201104page20image3950201376page20image3950201648

the same of Stanley Lord. He is not listed in the peerage, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t related. Lord is very scrubbed, but I did find one possible clue. His wife was a Tutton, and there are Tuttons in the peerage. A Francis Robert Tutton, b. 1874, married Lucy Evans Chavasse, her mother being Frances Evans. This is curious because Capt. Stanley Lord’s wireless operator was one Cyril Evans, indicating the two men may have been related. In fact, we do find a Cyril Lloyd Evans in the peerage, possibly of the right age for a match. He is scrubbed, the only thing we know about him being that his daughter’s middle name was Murray—which may have been her mother’s maiden name—and that she married the Baronet Bowen. Of course that is a clue, since that name already came up above. See Vice-Admiral Harold Gardiner Bowen of the ONR, possibly linked to Robin Gardiner who wrote the book on the Titanic switch. Anyway the first Baronet Bowen ran the Great South Railway in Argentina at the time of our story. His daughter married the son of Lt. Gen. Sir Alexander Cobbe, who in turn was the son of Nuzzeer Begum Khan.

[Added October 3: Also remember Walter Lord, who published the bestseller A Night to Remember in 1955, about the Titanic event. He was later a consultant to James Cameron for the 1997 film. Wikipedia admits he was OSS, the precursor to CIA. Lord’s mother was a Hoffman, very likely making him Jewish, and his grandfather was Richard Curzon Hoffman, President of the Baltimore Steam Packet Company—a steamship firm. Do you recognize the name Curzon? We saw it above, didn’t we? We saw the 2nd Baronet Smith/Bromley marrying the daughter of the Viscount Curzon. This pretty much proves Walter Lord was related to all these people.]

What this indicates to me is that Lord and Evans on the Californian were related and were both MI5/6. They were planted on the ship specifically to oversee the wreck. Along with the Carpathia, they were on hand to make sure the event went as planned. So I don’t think Lord was falsely accused, but I do think he was just following orders. Lord didn’t pick up anyone because there was no one to be picked up. The Carpathia was the designated pick-up ship, and she picked up all crew and cast, leaving no one in the water. The Californian wasn’t there to pick anyone up, she was there as the coordination vessel, and possibly as back-up. She may have warned off any other ships, telling them this was a military exercise or something.

Then Wikipedia tells us the next stunning lie. The captain of the Carpathia described the area around the Titanic wreck as a vast ice field with many icebergs and ice floes. If so, then what were all these other ships doing there in the first place? Why was Carpathia there at all, and how did she get in to theTitanic? Are we supposed to believe she was an icebreaker? We are then told that this area is now called Iceberg Alley. However, all we have to do is take the link to see that isn’t the case. Iceberg Alley exists, but it is far to the north. It isn’t at 41.7° N, it is in the Labrador Current, up between Newfoundland and Greenland, as I showed you above. It is about 400 miles north of the Titanic site, running from the 50th parallel to the 60th. Tens of thousands of sailors, navy men, geographers, and historians must know this, so why are you having to hear it from me? For that matter, why didn’t author Robin Gardiner mention any of this in his “hard-hitting and ground-breaking” book? I think you now know why.

www.mileswmathis.com

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.