and other interesting news.
As usual, this is just my opinion, based on internet research anyone can do.
Yes, this one caught even me by surprise. I wrote that
book-length paper on the Kennedys and never got a whiff of this. Mostly because I wasn’t looking for it, I guess. I was busy with other matters.
I only tripped across the information later. I was re-reading
my paper on Bill Clinton, where I found
evidence he, too, is gay, and I suddenly thought to myself, “Wait, they did the same thing with JFK,
building him up as a great ladies’ man. I wonder if he was also gay?” So I just typed in John Kennedy
gay”, and was immediately taken here
, where we find a 2015 book by Jerry
Oppenheimer claiming he was.
This is according to testimony by Lawrence Quirk, who worked on Kennedy’s first Congressional campaign and knew Kennedy’s lover Lem Billings.
Note that they are in France there. Have you ever heard of Lem Billings? I hadn’t until today. Since
that linked article is at a gay site, I at first dismissed it as a possible revenge outing of some sort, but
further research made that very difficult to do. I found
an article from the DailyMail in 2015, saying
the same things. There we learn Lem had a ‘high
, screechy laugh’ and a ‘high, nasal whine of a voice’
that, according to Quirk, ‘instantly tabbed him as gay.’ JFK’s sister Eunice said Jack “was a completely
liberated man when he was with Lem.” Yeah, I’ll bet.
And you can go to Lem Billings’ encyclopedia page
, as I did, which implicitly confirms it. There we are told Kennedy’s relationship with Billings
wasn’t just a childhood fling: it was lifelong. Billings had his own room in the White House and was
treated as a member of the family. What? Joseph Kennedy called Billings his second son. What?*
Jacqueline Kennedy said of Billings, “He has been my house guest since I was married.”
Billings was known to be gay. Gore Vidal called him the “principal fag at court”. Gore should know,
being both gay and related to the Bouviers. Billings said of Kennedy, “Because of him I was never
lonely. He may be the reason I never got married.” WHAT?
If you don’t think that changes everything, I don’t know what to say. They admit Jack had a
flamboyantly gay best friend living with him for three years in the White House, for Pete’s sake! How
else could you read it?
I mean, look at the photo under title.
The two guys are framed together!
Would you have considered
putting yourself in the same frame as your best friend in high school? Would you have considered
writing “Godlike” under your friend’s name? Why not just put little hearts with arrows through them
What’s wrong with that picture? We seem to be a girl short, don’t we? We seem to have three couples,
boy, girl, boy, girl, boy, boy. Hoo-boy! [Several readers have written in to point out something I
missed: Kennedy and Billings are wearing matching swim trunks.]
[Go ahead guys, hold hands, we know you want to.] Given that, it becomes clear that all of Jack’s
exploits and conquests were manufactured—which I think you will admit explains a lot. You will say
that maybe Jack was bisexual, but that doesn’t fit the old stories at all. Guys who are girl crazy aren’t
also gay. The people I have known who claimed to be bisexual were mostly gay. They seemed to be
gays who weren’t repulsed by women, and might do one or two to break up the monotony. But I have
never known or heard of a guy who did hundreds or thousands of women and also had a lifelong gay
boyfriend. It doesn’t work like that.
But you can think what you wish, obviously. If you think this new information can be worked into the
old stories without a total rewrite, fine. I don’t think it can.
What it may require is a rewrite of my conclusion in the Hidden Kings paper. Maybe Kennedy got
tired of living a lie and ran off to Capri with Billings in November of 1963. I will think on it.
Been thinking. Billings had almost no presence in the US after 1963, according to his bio, so he and
Jack may have run off together for a few years. According to these new stories, Jack was known to be
ill in the early 60s, with Billings acting as his nurse. That was probably also a factor. But the big clue
is that Billings didn’t become depressed and start drinking heavily until after
Robert Kennedy’s death in 1968. You would have thought he would have done that in 1963 or 1964. This is more indication that Jack actually died in 1968, with Bobby needing to retire at that time, fake his death, and take Jack’s
place in the hidden hierarchy.
Remember, they now admit Jack was very ill with Addison’s disease,
which causes a doubled mortality rate, so his dying at 51 in 1968 would not be too shocking. Billing’s
life and demeanor changed completely in that year, confirming that guess.
We learn more curious facts when we read that Lem Billings became a ‘surrogate father’ to Bobby
Kennedy, Jr., after the alleged death of RFK. Ethel Kennedy “booted” Bobby, Jr. out of the Hickory
Hill home at age 14 and basically fed him to Billings. Given that Billings was a heavy-drinking
homosexual with a penchant for pretty boys—and given that Bobby was a pretty boy—that has to look
The article admits Billings was obsessed with Bobby, saying he was just like Jack. Also strange is that
Jerry Oppenheimer, the author of the book revealing all this, also wrote the linked article at the
DailyMail. It used to be a no-no for authors to write their own promotion in the major media, for
obvious reasons. Also strange is his last name
Oppenheimer, since that is just another tentacle of the families, and a major one.
This Bobby Kennedy story is another clue, confirming my previous guess in my long Kennedy paper
that the current Kennedy family is partially manufactured, with actors hired to play some of the parts.
To start with, these brothers and cousins look nothing alike—as I have noted before—and when young
they are too good-looking to believe.
Families—especially these old Jewish families—simply don’t
have this many model-quality people in them. Feeding Bobby to Billings at age 14 is more indication
of that, since it may mean Bobby wasn’t Ethel’s real son. He was just a loaner from SAG, like so many
of these people. Some of them take on long-term roles, but others only sign on for the short-term, and
have to later be relocated. That may be what some of the fake deaths are about. I now begin to
suspect JFK Jr. is of that mold. JFK himself may be another.
That would explain why he was inserted into so many old family photos.
Billings involvement in this is also curious, since it indicates he was more than we have been sold, even
now. His genealogy confirms that (see below), indicating he may have outranked the Kennedys. He
certainly would have outranked these young actors. Wikipedia gives us solid proof of that, although
most will miss it.
Along with Sargent Shriver, Billings was a trustee for the Kennedy family
trusts. Billings begins to look like some sort of handler or eyes-on-the-ground for some faction. He may have
been a mole from a competing faction or family, which this whole Oppenheimer story would confirm.
It seems curious, doesn’t it, that the mainstream would be blackwashing the Kennedys like this right
now, and that an Oppenheimer would be doing it. To what end? I can’t say, but it may be another sign
of the internecine wars we have been looking at. The major families nudging one another for power. I
will continue to think on it.
Juicy or not, it is certainly more important as a matter of history. Because one thing it tells us—beyond
what we have already discovered—is that JFK’s boyfriend was also his cousin. The Fitzgeralds and
Kennedys are related to all these same people, not only through the Lewises, but through many of these
other names. See my papers on C. S. Lewis and F. Scott Fitzgerald for a start.
People are writing in to tell me we are all related and all cousins, if you go back far enough. No, not
really. Yes, maybe if you go back to the Stone Age, but normal people like you and me are not related
to these people this closely. If you do a normal person’s genealogy (not a famous person), you really
don’t get all these close and recent relationships to these central families.
People ask me if I have done my own. I have tried, but since I am not from these families, my
genealogy isn’t even known past a few generations. My mother’s mother’s father Maloy has a partial
genealogy, but I found no links to the families there. No Spencers, Churchills, Stanleys, Stuarts,
Paynes, Balls, Bennetts, Pitts, Webbs, etc. My father’s mother’s father Ramey also has a partial
genealogy, but again, none of these names I have flagged in recent papers pops up. People like you
and me aren’t considered important enough to have extensive genealogies. No one cares or ever has
But genealogies are very important to these ruling families, since they are very
concerned with bloodlines. So we have seen we can take many of them back to 900 AD and before.
Not only are the genealogies known, they are posted online—which is pretty amazing if you think
about it. It is even more amazing considering what I have found in them. They have basically hung the
dirty laundry out in the breeze. The only thing I can figure is that the pride outweighs the risk with
these people. They aren’t worried about anyone exposing them, since it has never been done before;
and they love linking themselves to Kings regardless. They probably just shrug off my papers as a
As a bonus, I discovered something else interesting in today’s research. In studying the name
Fitzgerald, I came to realize this name sold as Irish isn’t really Irish. None of the Fitz- names are. Fitz
comes from the French fils, meaning son , so it means “son of”, just like the “O” in O’Malley or the
“Mac” in MacDonald. But it isn’t an Irish prefix, it is a Norman prefix.
For instance, if we go to the House of Names and look at the name FitzAlan, we find it comes from Alain FitzFlaad in Brittany. FitzFlaad may have been a grandson of William the Conqueror. Neither FitzFlaad nor William the
Conqueror were Irish.
And if we look more closely at William the Conqueror, we find even more interesting things. We aren’t
ever told the surname of William the Conqueror, are we? What was the family there? It seems to be
hidden. We are told William descended from Rollo, a Viking, but that story isn’t very convincing.
What is interesting is that William’s grandmother (and niece) were named Judith. That seems like a
strange name for a Norman Queen, doesn’t it? And who was she? Judith isn’t a Viking name. Her
mother is not given, which is a red flag, even that far back, since her father
is given. He was Conan the Crooked. Are you chuckling yet? I am. Get ready to snort and guffaw. His father was
Some historians try to sell this Judhael as the grandson of Alan the Great, but I draw your
attention to his first name. Pretty obvious, isn’t it? He’s Jewish!
That’s William the Conqueror. Have you ever seen that? I haven’t. We weren’t shown that in school. I
encourage you to look closely at it. Could he look more Jewish? I’m sorry, but this is great fun: living
with your eyes open is amazing!