Trump wants to ‘get along’ with Russia but says NATO ‘no longer obsolete’
That’s the headline. But read the details of the article right to the end. Russia will have noticed even if most people in Europe haven’t.
Praising the alliance as the “bulwark of international peace and security” that “defeated communism and liberated the captive nations” of Eastern Europe, Trump said he had changed his mind about NATO after it agreed to do more to fight terrorism.
“We must not be trapped by the tired thinking… but apply new solutions to face new circumstances,” the US president told reporters in Washington on Wednesday, during a joint press conference with NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg.
“We agreed today that NATO can do more in the fight against international terrorism,” said Stoltenberg, pledging “cash, capabilities and contributions” to the effort.
“Together we represent half of the world’s economic and military power. No other superpower has ever had such a strategic advantage,” added Stoltenberg, the former Norwegian prime minister who has presided over the alliance since October 2014.
Both Trump and Stoltenberg sounded eager for better relations with Russia. US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is in Moscow, and has met with his counterpart Sergey Lavrov as well as Russian President Vladimir Putin.
“Things went pretty well, maybe better than anticipated,” Trump said when asked about Tillerson’s trip, adding that the results should be visible in the long term.
TAP – As for Britain and Trident, it’s not simply the outmoded and ageing weapon system that’s the problem, and one which makes us into a key target for Russia in any war. We are under a secret obligation to go to war on the command of the President of the United States as part of the Trident deal. Yet the US no longer recognises its obligation to run to the defence of any NATO ally that’s attacked. NATO is no longer obsolete, says Trump, but if there is no certainty of being defended from RUssia, it is effectively obsolete. I think it’s time Boris Johnson made that flight to Moscow. We are lapdogs to the losers who don’t give a shit about us. It’s a good moment to wake up to the foolishness of our position stirring up trouble all over the Middle East and elsewhere.
“It would be wonderful if we could get along with Russia. Right now we’re not getting along with Russia at all,” the president said. “Russia is a strong country. We’ve a very strong country. We’ll see how that works out.”
“Russia’s our neighbor, Russia’s here to stay,” said Stoltenberg, defending NATO’s troop build-up in Eastern Europe. “What we do is proportionate, it is defensive, and we don’t want a new Cold War.”
Addressing media reports about US officials accusing Russia of complicity in last week’s chemical attack in Syria, Trump allowed for the possibility.
“I think it’s certainly possible, I think it’s unlikely,” he said. “I would like to think they didn’t know.”
Any use of chemical weapons is “unacceptable,” Stoltenberg said. He added that the strike on the Syrian airbase was a US operation, not a NATO one, though it was met with understanding by the alliance.
“We strongly support the efforts of a fact-finding commission to establish what happened,” he added.
Trump once again described the world as “a mess” that he inherited from the Obama administration, but projected optimism about a range of problems, from Syria to North Korea.
“By the time I’m finished, it’s going to be a lot better place to live in, because right now it’s nasty,” he told reporters.
On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly referred to NATO as “obsolete,” and spoke of the need to update the 68-year-old alliance’s “outdated mission and structure.” He also said that the allies should engage more actively in the anti-terror efforts and not force the US to bear the brunt of the campaign.
“We support NATO far more than we should,” Trump said last July, adding that “a lot of countries that aren’t doing what they’re supposed to be doing.” Because of that, Candidate Trump said that if he were elected, the US would not be strictly held to its Article V provisions to militarily defend any allied nation, especially those not paying their fair share.