This is the bombshell dropped by Theresa May’s government while the media whined on about Traingate

August 25th, 2016 by  Kerry-anne Mendoza

This is the bombshell dropped by Theresa May’s government while the media whined on about Traingate

While the mainstream media joined Richard Branson’s smear campaign against Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn, the Conservative government dropped a bombshell. It is going to scrap the Human Rights Act.

On Wednesday 24 August, the front pages of almost every national newspaper – from The Telegraph to The Guardian – were railing against one thing, Traingate. Despite the fact that all of these outlets regularly report the plights of commuters on packed trains – commuters who have paid thousands of pounds a year for a season ticket which fails to guarantee them the dignity of a seat – suddenly this was all forgotten.

What they failed to mention was the most authoritarian and regressive decision taken by a UK government in modern history: the decision to push ahead with the scrapping of the Human Rights Act.

What is the Human Rights Act?

The Human Rights Act of 1998 guarantees every UK citizen the opportunity to defend themselves in domestic courts under rights granted them by the European Convention on Human Rights. As Liberty lays out, these are the rights given by the Act:

  • The right to life – protects your life, by law. The state is required to investigate suspicious deaths and deaths in custody;
  • The prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment – you should never be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way, no matter what the situation;
  • Protection against slavery and forced labour – you should not be treated like a slave or subjected to forced labour;
  • The right to liberty and freedom – you have the right to be free and the state can only imprison you with very good reason – for example, if you are convicted of a crime;
  • The right to a fair trial and no punishment without law – you are innocent until proven guilty. If accused of a crime, you have the right to hear the evidence against you, in a court of law;
  • Respect for privacy and family life and the right to marry – protects against unnecessary surveillance or intrusion into your life. You have the right to marry and raise a family;
  • Freedom of thought, religion and belief – you can believe what you like and practise your religion or beliefs;
  • Free speech and peaceful protest – you have a right to speak freely and join with others peacefully, to express your views;
  • No discrimination – everyone’s rights are equal. You should not be treated unfairly – because, for example, of your gender, race, sexuality, religion or age;
  • Protection of property, the right to an education and the right to free elections – protects against state interference with your possessions; means that no child can be denied an education and that elections must be free and fair.

These rights are now being scrapped, and replaced by a pick-and-mix Bill of Rights drafted by the May government.

May’s Bill of Rights

Rather than a guaranteed set of rights worked through by human rights champions and lawyers from across Europe, the rights of British people will now be set out by a handful of civil servants in Westminster, under the authority of Theresa May.

Britain’s new Prime Minister does not have a great record of upholding civil liberties and human rights. She has already pushed forward the Investigatory Powers Bill – a Snooper’s Charter – as The Canary previously reported:

[The bill] is designed to secure immense surveillance powers for the UK’s security services, and other public bodies. The proposals include allowing bulk interception of communications, bulk collection of communications data – meaning ‘metadata’ which is essentially the data about data – and bulk equipment interference – aka hacking.

Passed on 7 June, the Snooper’s Charter has been widely criticised as being an ineffective tool for combating what it claims it wants to combat (i.e. terrorist activities). As Bella Sankey, Director of Policy for Liberty, explains:

This Bill would create a detailed profile on each of us which could be made available to hundreds of organisations to speculatively trawl and analyse. It will all but end online privacy, put our personal security at risk and swamp law enforcement with swathes of useless information.

With this in mind, we can expect a bill of rights which protects corporations and government from the public (and the taxpayer), rather than protecting individuals and groups from the threat of overwhelming state and corporate power.

Featured Image via Flickr Creative Commons

Source: http://www.thecanary.co/2016/08/25/this-is-the-bombshell-dropped-by-theresa-mays-government-while-the-media-whined-on-about-traingate/

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Responses to “This is the bombshell dropped by Theresa May’s government while the media whined on about Traingate”

  1. Scotty says:

    Did we not, then, already have these ‘human rights’ under British law, prior to 1998?
    I thought it was the ‘equality’ legislation and ‘anti-discrimination’ legislation which has caused many problems and upsets?
    I am not a lawyew, these are questions.

  2. edbutt says:

    The Canary is a hard line leftist site and the heavily spun reports they publish can be ignored.
    It has long been known that the EUROPEAN Human Rights Act was to be abandoned so the story is not news. Repealing the act is a move that will return to British control the ability to deport foreign terrorists, hate preachers and criminals. No longer will people wanted for murder in their own country be able to avoid justice by claiming they ‘have a right to family life’. Nor should the fact that some criminals face the death penalty in their homeland be a defence against deportation. Being allowed to get away with murder is not a human right.
    Scotty is right to ask (a rhetorical question I guess) did we not have the true human rights covered by the act enshrined in British law prior to jointing the European Human Rights fiasco. We did, most of them are in fact derived from the Geneva Convention of 1949. Some of that was actually based on the Liber Judicialis, the Anglo Saxon common law implemented by King Alfred the Great in the ninth century. Most of what has been added by the European Human Rights act has little to do with ‘rights’ and much to do with assigning privileges to favoured minorities.
    In it’s Article 10 purportedly protecting free speech, the European Act adds this caveat: “This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.”
    In other words you have the right to speak freely but the government has the right to control information.
    We are better off without freedoms like that.
    Another point to remember is that under The Common Law and the laws of most democratic nations, people are free to do anything that is not specifically prohibited by law. Under European law you are forbidden to do anything that is not specifically permitted by law.
    That in itself shows how corrupt and illiberal the European Human Rights law is.
    And for the record, it was Jeremy Corbyn himself who planted the story about having to sit on the floor. Though he had a valid point about crowded trains, it turns out the story was not quite as he told it and that was newsworthy.
    The sooner The Canary is exposed to a high level of firedamp the better.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.