In a new publication for thinktank Politeia, Mr Howe insisted there is no hurry to trigger Article 50 – the legal process by which a member state formally quits the EU – but Britain’s EU exit must be wrapped up before the 2020 general election.Invoking Article 50 will put a two-year deadline on Britain and the rest of the EU agreeing a new relationship.He dismissed Brussels’ threat that it will not hold preliminary talks with the UK before Article 50 is actioned, claiming there is “every incentive” for individual member states to ‘pre-negotiate’ with Britain.In a paper titled ‘How to Leave the EU: Legal and Trade Priorities for the New Britain’, the Queen’s Counsel wrote: “It is vital that the UK recognises that it must be willing to exit the EU on that final date without an agreement if that proves necessary.”Mr Howe explained how under a “twin-track policy” Britain must tie up trade deals with other parts of the world and those European countries not in the EU, as well as seek a deal with Brussels.But he stressed a potential EU agreement must not be to the detriment of the other deals Britain agrees. He said: “Our objectives in negotiating with the EU should then be to reach an agreement with the EU that in all respects is compatible with our domestic and world trading priorities, not the other way round.”
Mr Howe also warned British negotiators not to try and complete an “all-encompassing” agreement with Brussels that would include terms on both trade and non-trade cooperation.He said this would “create a ‘lobster pot’ effect which makes it difficult to withdraw from an area of cooperation or to require its terms to be revised without bringing to an end the entire arrangement between the UK and the EU”.The barrister cited the example of Switzerland, whose migration agreements with the EU are linked to its economic deal.Mr Howe said the UK must leave the EU’s ‘single market’ during Brexit as it could force “harmful ‘Fortress Europe’ restrictions on our trade with non-EU countries”.He suggested continuing a free trade arrangement with the bloc was likely, adding: “As the EU’s best customer, one which buys far more from the EU than it sells to the bloc, continuing on the basis of a free trade deal is more in their interests than the UK’s.”Applying to rejoin the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) – which Britain was a founder member of in 1960 before having to withdraw membership to join the European Economic Community (EEC) 13 years later – would preserve free trade arrangements with EFTA members Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein immediately after Brexit, Mr Howe argued. He stressed this does not mean Britain would have to remain signed up to uncontrolled EU immigration through the freedom of movement principle, in exchange for free trade.
He said: “Free movement between the EU and EFTA states is the result of membership of the EEA (European Economic Area), not on account of their membership of EFTA.”