Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics

 

citizen cattle

Download or view this article as a .pdf file

This is the data the drug industry do not want you to see. Here 2 centuries of UK, USA and Australian official death statistics show conclusively and scientifically modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies. 

A detailed Contents listing of this article with each category of disease and related graphs appears after the Introduction.

Introduction

The main advances in combating disease over 200 years have been better food and clean drinking water.  Improved sanitation, less overcrowded and better living conditions also contribute. This is also borne out in published peer reviewed research:

In addition to the extensive static graphs below, the following superb BBC FOUR broadcast by Professor Hans Rosling shows how health improved in step with wealth over the last 200 years200 countries over 200 years using 120,000 numbers – in just four minutes:

Measles mortality graphs are enlightening [more below] and contradict the claims of Government health officials that vaccines have saved millions of lives.  It is an unscientific claim which the data show is untrue. Here you will also learn why vaccinations like mumps and rubella for children are medically unethical and can expose medical professionals to liability for criminal proceedings and civil damages for administering them.

Read more: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/

 

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Responses to “Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics”

  1. Baz says:

    “During a conference involving health professionals, a PhD immunologist and vaccine proponent admitted that babies are only given vaccinations up to age one in order to ‘train the parents’ to get their children into the medical system…she also added that the vaccines are completely worthless.

    The immunologist, who declined to be identified after she made the comments, responded to a question about the rationale of giving infants vaccines in the first year of their life when they have no positive effect.

    Q. So the science seems fairly clear that for the first year of life, probably, that the immunization is not stimulating the kind of response we expect it to stimulate.

    A. True.

    Q. So what’s the rationale for continuing to do that if it’s not doing what it’s supposed to be [doing]?

    A. vaccines are given at pediatric wellness visits, and the idea is that you are training the parent to bring their child in at all the pediatric wellness visits, and that it’s only the year visit that actually is truly important. But that for most parents you are not going to get them to bring their kid in if they don’t come in at two months, four months, and six months. And so it’s actually more of a training thing.

    It’s interesting, I was on the phone with [?] county public health last week, with one of their vaccine nurses. She was like, ‘Oh, you’re talking about vaccines? Make sure you tell them they have to do that year shot because the first three [the 2, 4 and 6 month shots] don’t work.’ I was like, ‘Yeah, I know.’ [laughter].

    The notion that babies are being injected with vaccines for the first year of their life simply in order to brainwash parents into feeding their children into the medical system is an extremely disturbing premise.

    As Dave Mihalovic highlights, “Infants in their first year mostly depend on generalized, non-specific immunity, including (hopefully) immunoglobulins from breast milk, to protect their young bodies from infection. Vaccines are not only ineffective in the first year of life, but they can cause harm through synergistic toxicity and a state of immune overload.”

    While there is little evidence that immunizing babies in the first year of their lives serves any positive purpose, the risk factor is well documented.

    A shocking study published in a prestigious medical journal in 2011 found a direct statistical link between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates in the developed world, suggesting that the increasing number of inoculations being forced upon children by medical authorities, particularly in the United States which administers the highest number of vaccines and also has the highest number of infant deaths, is in fact having a detrimental impact on health.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.