Winston Churchill: Britain’s “Greatest Briton” Left a Legacy of Global Conflict and Crimes Against Humanity

Sir Winston S Churchill.jpg

Sunday January 24th 2016 marks the anniversary of the death of one of the most lionized leaders in the Western world: Sir Winston Churchill.

The current British Prime Minister, David Cameron, has called Churchill “the greatest ever Prime Minister”, and Britons have recently voted him as the greatest Briton to have ever lived.

The story that British schoolbooks tell children about Churchill is of a British Bulldog, with unprecedented moral bravery and patriotism. He, who defeated the Nazis during World War II and spread civilisation to indigenous people from all corners of the globe. Historically, nothing could be further from the truth.

http://blog.bestitalianleather.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Winston-Churchill.jpg

To the vast majority of the world, where the sun once never set on the British empire, Winston Churchill remains a great symbol of racist Western imperialist tyranny, who stood on the wrong side of history.

The myth of Churchill is Britain’s greatest propaganda tool because it rewrites Churchill’s true history in order to whitewash Britain’s past imperialist crimes against humanity. The Churchill myth also perpetuates Britain’s ongoing neo-colonial and neo-liberal policies, that still, to the is day, hurt the very people around the world that Churchill was alleged to have helped civilise.

The same man whose image is polished and placed on British mantelpieces as a symbol of all that is Great about Britain was an unapologetic racist and white supremacist. “I hate Indians, they are a beastly people with a beastly religion”, he once bellowed. As Churchill put it, Palestinians were simply “barbaric hordes who ate little but camel dung.”

In 1937, he told the Palestine Royal Commission:

 

“I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.”

It is unsurprising that when Barack Obama became President, he returned to Britain a bust of Churchill which he found on his desk in the Oval office. According to historian Johann Hari, Mr. Obama’s Kenyan grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, was imprisoned without trial for two years and was tortured on Churchill’s watch, for daring to resist Churchill’s empire.

Apart from being an unrepentant racist, Churchill was also a staunch proponent of the use of terrorism as a weapon of war.

During the Kurdish rebellion against the British dictatorship in 1920, Churchill remarked that he simply did not understand the “squeamishness” surrounding the use of gas by civilized Great Britain as a weapon of terror. “I am strongly in favour of using gas against uncivilised tribes, it would spread a lively terror,” he remarked.

In the same year, as Secretary of State for War, Churchill sent the infamous Black and Tans to Ireland to fight the IRA. The group became known for vicious terrorist attacks on civilians which Churchill condoned and encouraged.

While today Britons celebrate Churchill’s legacy, much of the world outside the West mourns the legacy of a man who insisted that it was the solemn duty of Great Britain to invade and loot foreign lands because in Churchill’s own words Britain’s “Aryan stock is bound to triumph”.

Churchill’s legacy in the Far East, Middle East, South Asia and Africa is certainly not one of an affable British Lionheart, intent on spreading civilization amongst the natives of the world. To people of these regions the imperialism, racism, and fascism of a man like Winston Churchill can be blamed for much of the world’s ongoing conflicts and instability.

As Churchill himself boasted, he “created Jordan with a stroke of a pen one Sunday afternoon,” thereby placing many Jordanians under the brutal thumb of a throneless Hashemite prince, Abdullah. Historian Michael R. Burch recalls how the huge zigzag in Jordan’s eastern border with Saudi Arabia has been called “Winston’s Hiccup” or “Churchill’s Sneeze” because Churchill carelessly drew the expansive boundary after a generous lunch.

Churchill also invented Iraq. After giving Jordan to Prince Abdullah, Churchill, the great believer in democracy that he was, gave Prince Abdullah’s brother Faisal an arbitrary patch of desert that became Iraq. Faisal and Abdullah were war buddies of Churchill’s friend T. E. Lawrence, the famous “Lawrence of Arabia”.

Much like the clumsy actions in Iraq of today’s great Empire, Churchill’s imperial foreign policy caused decades of instability in Iraq by arbitrarily locking together three warring ethnic groups that have been bleeding heavily ever since. In Iraq, Churchill bundled together the three Ottoman vilayets of Basra that was predominantly Shiite, Baghdad that was Sunni, and Mosul that was mainly Kurd.

Ask almost anyone outside of Iraq who is responsible for the unstable mess that Iraq is in today and they are likely to say one word, either “Bush” or “America”. However, if you asked anyone within Iraq who is mainly responsible for Iraq’s problems over the last half century and they are likely to simply say “Churchill”.

Winston Churchill convened the 1912 Conference in Cairo to determine the boundaries of the British Middle Eastern mandate and T.E. Lawrence was the most influential delegate. Churchill did not invite a single Arab to the conference, which is shocking but hardly surprising since in his memoirs Churchill said that he never consulted the Arabs about his plans for them.

The arbitrary lines drawn in Middle Eastern sand by Churchillian imperialism were never going to withstand the test of time. To this day, Churchill’s actions have denied Jordanians, Iraqis, Kurds and Palestinians anything resembling true democracy and national stability.

The intractable Israeli-Palestinian conflict can also be traced directly back to Churchill’s door at number 10 Downing Street and his decision to hand over the “Promised Land” to both Arabs and Jews. Churchill gave practical effect to the Balfour declaration of 1917, which expressed Britain’s support for the creation of a Jewish homeland, resulting in the biggest single error of British foreign policy in the Middle East.

Churchill’s legacy in Sub-Saharan Africa and Kenya in particular is also one of deep physical and physiological scars that endure to this day.

Of greater consequence to truth and history should be a man’s actions, not merely his words. Whilst Churchill has become one of the most extensively quoted men in the English speaking world, particularly on issues of democracy and freedom, true history speaks of a man whose actions revolved around, in Churchill’s own words, “a lot of jolly little wars against barbarous peoples”.

One such war was when Kikuyu Kenyans rebelled for their freedom only to have Churchill call them “brutish savage children” and force 150,000 of them into “Britain’s Gulag”.

Pulitzer-prize winning historian, Professor Caroline Elkins, highlights Churchill’s many crimes in Kenya in her book Britain’s Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya. Professor Elkins explains how Churchill’s soldiers “whipped, shot, burned, and mutilated Mau Mau suspects”, all in the name of British “civilization”. It is said that President Obama’s grandfather Hussein Onyango Obama never truly recovered from the torture he endured from Churchill’s men.

The Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen has proved how in Bengal in 1943 Churchill engineered one of the worst famines in human history for profit.

Over three million civilians starved to death whilst Churchill refused to send food aid to India. Instead, Churchill trumpeted that “the famine was their own fault for breeding like rabbits.” Churchill intentionally hoarded grain to sell for profit on the open market after the Second World War instead of diverting it to starving inhabitants of a nation controlled by Britain. Churchill’s actions in India unquestionably constituted a crime against humanity.

Churchill was also one of the greatest advocates of Britain’s disastrous divide-and-rule foreign policy.

Churchill’s administration deliberately created and exacerbated sectarian fissures within India’s independence movement, between Indian Hindus and Muslims that have had devastating effects on the region ever since.

Prior to India’s independence from Britain, Churchill was eager to see bloodshed erupt in India, so as to prove that Britain was the benevolent “glue holding the nation together”. For Churchill, bloodshed also had the added strategic advantage that it would also lead to the partition of India and Pakistan. Churchill’s hope was this partition would result in Pakistan remaining within Britain’s sphere of influence. This, in turn, would enable the Great Game against the Soviet empire to continue, no matter the cost to innocent Indian and Pakistanis. The partition of India with Pakistan caused the death of about 2.5 million people and displaced some 12.5 million others.

According to writer, Ishaan Tharoor, Churchill’s own Secretary of State for India, Leopold Amery,  compared his boss’s understanding of India’s problems to King George III’s apathy for the Americas. In his private diaries Amery vented that “on the subject of India, Churchill is not quite sane” and that he didn’t “see much difference between Churchill’s outlook and Hitler’s.”

Churchill shared far more ideologically in common with Hitler than most British historians care to admit. For instance, Churchill was a keen supporter of eugenics, something he shared in common with Germany’s Nazi leadership, who were estimated estimated to have killed 200,000 disabled people and forcibly sterilised twice that number. Churchill drafted a highly controversial piece of legislation, which mandated that the mentally ill be forcibly sterilized. In a memo to the Prime Minister in 1910, Winston Churchill cautioned, “the multiplication of the feeble-minded is a very terrible danger to the race”. He also helped organise the International Eugenics Conference of 1912, which was the largest meeting of proponents of eugenics in history.

Churchill had a long standing belief in racial hierarchies and eugenics. In Churchill’s view, white protestant Christians were at the very top of the pyramid, above white Catholics, while Jews and Indians were only slightly higher than Africans.

Historian, Mr. Hari, rightfully points out, “the fact that we now live in a world where a free and independent India is a superpower eclipsing Britain, and a grandson of the Kikuyu ‘savages’ is the most powerful man in the world, is a repudiation of Churchill at his ugliest – and a sweet, ironic victory for Churchill at his best.”

Amid today’s Churchillian parades and celebratory speeches, British media and schoolbooks may choose to only remember Churchill’s opposition to dictatorship in Europe, but the rest of the world cannot choose to forget Churchill’s imposition of dictatorship on darker skinned people outside of Europe. Far from being the Lionheart of Britain, who stood on the ramparts of civilisation, Winston Churchill, all too often, simply stood on the wrong side of history.

Churchill is indeed the Greatest Briton to have ever lived, because for decades, the myth of Churchill has served as Britain’s greatest propaganda tool to bolster national white pride and glorify British imperial culture.

Garikai Chengu is a scholar at Harvard University. Contact him on garikai.chengu@gmail.com

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

11 Responses to “Winston Churchill: Britain’s “Greatest Briton” Left a Legacy of Global Conflict and Crimes Against Humanity”

  1. Lynn says:

    The man was an Ogre..evil personified. He deserves to be urinated on and more.

  2. Aldous says:

    “Churchill is indeed the Greatest Briton to have ever lived, because for decades, the myth of Churchill has served as Britain’s greatest propaganda tool to bolster national white pride and glorify British imperial culture.”

    Let’s get one thing crystal clear. Churchill was not an Anglo-Saxon or Briton but a malevolent, sodomite, wandering JEW. His crimes are not White crimes but Jewish crimes.

    http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-churchill.html

    Sir Winston Churchill’s Jewish Ancestry – Churchill’s mother was Jewish

    http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-churchill-jewish-mother.html

    • Men Scryfa says:

      Thank you once again Aldous for this well needed clarification.

      The current plan is for the very same Cabal to launch WWIII off the backs of USA/UK after years of misusing the military of those two nations to attack and pillage numerous countries most notably in the Middle East. By reason of this obvious plan they intend to bring down the opprobrium and hate of all of the other nations of the World down on the USA and UK and remaining White Nations and people’s generally. Then when the same Cabal is busy genociding the actually ignorant and used White people in their home nations, the other people in the rest of the World will simply think ‘well they got what they deserved’. Meanwhile those very same non-White races are distracted from how they are being taken over themselves by the same Cabal and placed under a One World Government. That without going into the role of Mind Control is how The Cabal is planning on doing it in a nutshell

      Will it work? That is down to what each person decides to do.

  3. Lynn says:

    Yes Aldous…we were led to believe he was a HEROE…well we know different now don’t we. He was a monster and a murderer. Just like the Blairite and the Scameron. We have been had. All Ben Dovers..!!

  4. Aldous says:

    Churchill had huge gambling, drinking and whoring bills, and Jock Colville claimed he usually insisted on ginger haired prostitutes, so they bought him a ginger tomcat as a private joke. Churchill’s Sandhurst file, the original and proper one lists him as, ‘a confirmed sodomite and a menace to the younger boys’ ( Courtesy of guy burgess diaries ) this waywardness allowed Churchill to be used by the bankers, under the carrot and the stick, you do as we say and you get paid x amount, you don’t do as we say and we ruin you. In W W 1 Churchill took bankers cash in the name of Colonel Arden, and W W II his secretary said several names were used, Mr. A Conner’s was alleged to be just one.

    http://kollinos.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/winston-churchill.html

  5. Dublinmick says:

    Good ole Winston, he liked boys and his wife Violet supposedly jumped off a cliff, yeah sure. His private secretary Lord Boothby supplied rent boys to top people along with mobster Ronnie Kray. In fact he just lurved Rothschild’s soviet agent Victor Bugess. The anglo German Fellowship was headed by wait for it, Victor Burgess. Winston and friends took a trip to the Hitler Youth camp to bang some of the boys.

    Burgess went on to join M16. King Edward VII the half brother of Blunt was one of Burgess’ lovers.

    Top people supported both sides of the war with Germany. It was just a bunch of goyim getting killed. The cabal which ran Britain and Germany were also buds with the zionists running Russia.

    ‘Cunning, no doubt, came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother Lady Randolph Churchill, née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.’ Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post

    ~

    Leonard Jerome was the Jewish owner of the New York Times. He was a close friend of August Belmont, Sr American representative of the Rothschild family’s banking. He changed his name from Jacobson to Jerome. His daughter was Jenny Jacobson/Jerome, the mother of Winston Churchill.

    http://pierrejoubert.blogspot.com/2005/08/was-churchill-jewish.html

  6. Men Scryfa says:

    Presumably Britain’s ‘Greatest Briton’ would have also supported the Mass Immigration into Europe sponsored funded and brought about by the Cabal?

    http://newobserveronline.com/inside-the-refugee-centers-a-worker-speaks/

  7. beLIEve says:

    Churchill was an a$hkeNAZI khazar RAT-child…according to Greg Hallett.

    Churchill was apparently, the illegitimate son of “king” ed VII.
    “king” ed VII was the 1st child of FAKE cween Vic and, her…. …”KNOCKER UPPER”………LIE O’NELL Nathan RAT-child.

    “king” ed VII is said to have….KNOCKED UP….a female; out of wedlock, by the name of Jenny Jerome.

    Jenny Jerome then contracted a hasty marriage with Ran-dolt Churchill and, produced “king” ed VIIs ….SPAWN….aka Winston.

    Winston then did ….his “bit” for the INCESTUOUS RAT-childs.

    Winston, according to Greg Hallett, donated “biological matter” to the female who was pretending to be Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon; the one who ….PLAYED the ROLE of “Cween” mum.

    The “Cween” mum aka the….IMPOSTER….produced a little ….rat-child……who the SCUM lead us to ….beLIEve….was KOSHER “royalty”.

    Winston never one to…… SHIRK HIS DUTY…….”performed”…. again.

    This time, according to Greg Hallett, Winston ….KNOCKED UP…his…. daughter-in-law ….Pamela Digsby-Churchill.

    Guess who appeared on the scene, as a result of this “liason” ? ?

    Yup……….B-ILL….I didn’t knock-up the… Mo$-$ad…. agent Monica Lewinsky……………CLINTON.

    Which means, “cween liz-ard” the Buck House IMPOSTER is a ….HALF-SISTER…to Billy-boy Clinton.

    Aint fami-LIES just amazin’ ?

    http://www.hallettreport.com/No2.html#.VqYB4PmLSUk

    Oh yes, I nearly forgot, according to Greg Hallett…..95% of HEROIN that gets into the UK is …FLOWN IN by NATO.

  8. Lynn says:

    They are real Kyle fodder.. Far more dysfunctional and drugged off their heads. Only they have us pay for it all. It’s deranged what they have done and we are learning fast. They are the most screwed up insane inbred morons …living on stolen benefits.

  9. Lynn says:

    Sub Humans…!
    They are finished once the Goyim stand up.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.