U.S. Propaganda: It’s Not Just False, but Absurd.

Screen Shot 2015-02-25 at 1.49.28 PM

 

By Eric Zuesse, as originally published at strategic-culture.org.

 

It’s so ridiculous, no intelligent and informed person would give it any serious consideration whatsoever. It insults the public’s intelligence.

Here’s a typical example of the ridiculousness of U.S. propaganda: On July 16th, the U.S. State Department issued a “Ukraine Travel Warning.” It says:

——

The Department of State warns U.S. citizens to defer all travel to Crimea and the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, and recommends those U.S. citizens currently living in or visiting these regions to depart. …

Russia-backed separatists continue to control areas in the Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts. Despite the signing of a ceasefire agreement by representatives of Ukraine, Russia and the OSCE, violent clashes between combined Russian separatist forces and Ukrainian forces continue in parts of the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, resulting in thousands of injuries and deaths. The ceasefire agreement established a de facto dividing line between Ukrainian government-controlled and separatist-held areas of Ukraine, with numerous checkpoints controlled by government and separatist forces. Individuals, including U.S. citizens, have been threatened, detained or kidnapped for hours or days after being stopped at separatist checkpoints. …

The Department of State also warns U.S. citizens to defer all travel to the Crimean Peninsula, which is occupied by Russia. The Russian Federation is likely to take further actions in Crimea throughout the remainder of 2015 consistent with its attempted unlawful annexation and occupation of this part of Ukraine. The international community, including the United States and Ukraine, does not recognize this purported annexation. The Russian Federation maintains an extensive military presence in Crimea and along the border of eastern Ukraine. …

——

Prior to the U.S. overthrow of the democratically elected President of Ukraine in February 2014, there was peace throughout Ukraine. Obama (his Administration, as shown in that video) replaced the existing Ukrainian President, Viktor Yanukovych, who, like all of his predecessors, was corrupt; and the U.S. propaganda-machine publicized his corruption, while virtually ignoring the fact of corruption’s normalcy in at least post-Soviet Ukraine (corruption that had been greatly encouraged by the U.S.). The U.S. didn’t replace him because he was corrupt. The U.S. replaced him because he supported a non-aligned Ukraine: neither a stooge to the U.S., nor to Russia. Barack Obama repeatedly asserts that — as he phrased it to West Point cadets on 28 May 2014 — “The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. [So: all other  nations are ‘dispensable.’] That has been true for the century passed [he misspelled ‘past’] and it will be true for the century to come.” Adolf Hitler and his Nazis said it for their country more succinctly: “Deutschland über alles.” Except that Hitler proclaimed that his would be a “Thousand-Year Reich,” not merely “for the century to come.”

The U.S. began its overthrow-operation early in 2013. At that time, Yanukovych was still considering offers for Ukraine to join the U.S.-backed European Union, or else to join the Russia-backed Eurasian Economic Community. The EU is much larger, but Ukraine’s centuries-long former association with, and economic extensions from (including favored-nation trading status with) Russia, would have been very costly for Ukraine to sever. Ukraine’s economy had long been based far more on trade with Russia than on with trade with the rest of Europe. 

According to MIT, the “Top 5 export destinations” from Ukraine were: Russia (24%), Egypt (6.5%), Turkey (5.2%), Italy (3.8%), and Kazakhstan (3.5%). The “Top 5 import origins” into Ukraine were: Russia (31%), China (9.0%), Germany (8.2%), Belarus (6.4%), and Poland (5.0%). 

On 19 November 2013, Yanukovych met with the European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy. The economists at the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences had recently delivered their report to Yanukovych, which concluded that the net loss from joining the EU would be $160 billion. Yanukovych asked the Commissioner, “If we sign, will you help us,” so that Ukraine wouldn’t bear the entirety of this enormous cost. The Commissioner said, “Sorry,” no. (The Commissioner suggested that Ukraine might borrow the money from the IMF — which would be the kind of national suicide that actually occurred after the U.S. overthrew Yanukovych.) The next day, Yanukovych announced that he was turning down the EU’s offer. Then, according to wikipedia, the “Maidan” demonstrations to oust Yanukovych from power started on 21 November 2013. Brandon Turbeville has described the 40-year-long development of the technology that the CIA and State Department built for that overthrow.

But, in fact, as I documented back in February, “The Entire Case for Sanctions Against Russia Is Pure Lies.” The whole case is fraudulent

So: the U.S. State Department rejects the legitimacy of the overwhelming, and the repeatedly polling-confirmed, desire of the Crimean people to cease being Ukrainian (which they had been only from 1954 to 2014), even though this same U.S. State Department accepts the legitimacy of the Scottish people to determine whether or not to continue being British (which they have been ever since 1707). The sovereign democratic right of Crimeans is denied, while the sovereign democratic right of the Scotts is affirmed. One needs to be a sucker to believe that, but it’s the U.S. Government’s official line.

As for the residents of Donbass (“Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts”), Obama needs to get rid of them, because they had voted over 90% for the man he overthrew. If they stay alive and within Ukraine, then the regime that Obama installed will get voted out of office. 

In fact, that’s the reason why Russia’s leader, Vladimir Putin, has insisted that they remain within Ukraine — so that they will vote out of office the anti-Russian racist fascists that Obama installed, next door to Russia, in Ukraine. That’s as if during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, the dictator of the Soviet Union, Nikita Khruschev, had grabbed control over not only Cuba but even over Mexico right on America’s border. Would the United States have tolerated that, then? So, Putin doesn’t tolerate this, now.

The irony is that it’s Putin who wants the “pro-Russian rebels” to remain as part of Ukraine; and it’s Obama who wants them not to be — even while he claims that Putin does, and asserts that Putin is the aggressor.

For example, on 3 September 2014, Obama said:

“Fifth — we must continue to stand united against Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. (Applause.) Keep in mind that, repeatedly, President Putin has ignored the opportunity to resolve the crisis in Ukraine diplomatically. The United States, the European Union, our partners around the world have all said we prefer a diplomatic solution. But in light of Russia’s unwillingness to seize that opportunity, we have come together to impose major sanctions on Russia for its actions.”

A more devilishly lying country than the United States of today is hard to imagine. It’s even a dictatorship: its government represents not the public (as its Founders had intended) but its aristocracy (which those Founders had tried to overthrow — and did overthrow, in their own era).

The U.S. Government even has the brazen audacity to brag about its success at fooling the global publics — not only here but around the world — to deceive them to think that the demon is Putin, and not Obama.

In fact, as I headlined on 7 October 2014, “Leading German Journalist Admits CIA ‘Bribed’ Him and Other Leaders of the Western ‘Press’.”

The U.S. Government holds the public everywhere in contempt.

———-

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Source: http://rinf.com/alt-news/editorials/u-s-propaganda-its-not-just-false-but-absurd/

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Responses to “U.S. Propaganda: It’s Not Just False, but Absurd.”

  1. ian says:

    I’m retired. When I was young, we didn’t have a TV. I believed most of what I was told at school and what my mam and dad told me. Fights at school were often over what your dad said conflicting with what someone else’s dad said. Gradually TV took over our societies, even the drama programs teaching us how to behave in certain situations, and towards certain people, giving us our opinions and much of our discussion matter.
    I remember as a young man, eagerly anticipating the John Pilger report on TV because it rang more of reality and truth. It didn’t have that dissonance that was constantly there between what was happening and what you were being told. John Pilger never went far enough for me, he seemed to lack solutions, only pointing out problems and lies of government. Now in reflection, he probably couldn’t have got away with giving solutions, as they would always have been a contrary to our leaders wishes.
    The internet, Aroooogah, the wonderful internet allowed us access to everything we could dream of, good and bad. It allowed us to explore whatever we wanted and go further than Pilger could ever have went. Within a short time of me getting access to it though, I noticed changes happening. Deliberate disinformation, fraud, scams, sleaze worse than you could imagine. Desperate attempts to discredit information as unreliable,( we knew where they wanted us to go for reliable info). I, and I’m not proud of it, just using it as an example, used to check out Ogrish.com. It had any videos from Iraq, cop shooting in the US etc plus even less savoury items in it’s library. One night I heard Teflon Tony mentioning on TV that Live leak would have videos from Iraq before he heard of them. They’d nobbled Ogrish, and called it Live leak. They’ve got Google, YouTube, and slowly slowly they’re taking as much as they can from us. Now trying to call us terrorists, and their label, conspiracy theorists. Non violent extremist, I like, because they are violent extremists. The cat is out of the bag now though, and however much they try to take, they can’t take the facts we now know. Every day that passes, makes more people aware of their lies and secrets, and taking our right to find out and confront there scheming, from us, only proves that our “conspiracy theories” are well founded in fact. All dictators surround themselves with yes men, and it’s these yes men who tell them that they’re winning in their propaganda war, because from where I sit, I’m not seeing it.

  2. Nike says:

    “The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. [So: all other  nations are ‘dispensable.’] That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come.” Adolf Hitler and his Nazis said it for their country more succinctly: “Deutschland über alles.” Except that Hitler proclaimed that his would be a “Thousand-Year Reich,” not merely “for the century to come.”

    They simply can’t do without Hitler… (Zionist anti-German propaganda. Fed up with it!)

    German history is much more than 12 years of nazi rule.
    “Deutschland über alles” (Germany above all) has never been the anthem’s title. The line “Germany, Germany above all” meant that the most important goal of the Vormärz revolutionaries should be a unified Germany overcoming the Kleinstaaterei (division into lots of small states) Alongside the Flag of Germany it was one of the symbols of the March Revolution of 1848.
    (Golden – Red – Black not the other way round)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAK23saAI1I

    It’s not as it seems. It’s not a “role model“. The German people are being enslaved and subdued. Things go very, very wrong. Nothing really works (in the true sense of the meaning)

    “Upon German reunification in 1990, the third stanza only was confirmed as the national anthem.“
    That’s not true. The line is not forbidden either. Germans know the true meaning. It’s about UNIY (of minds) overcoming division (by those undermining unity; their method used being “Divide and Rule“)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.