Sabine’s coming back to Britain

The zeitgeist is changing.  Mainline blogs and media are starting to cover paedophilia and child abuse, which they never used to do.

Foreign Policy, a publication in New York, says people in Britain are losing faith in their government due to endless revelations of paedophilia and child abuse amongst MPs.   More than 70 serving MPs are currently under investigation.

Sabine McNeill reports also that the EU is addressing the issue of forced adoption, so the answer to Britain’s evil Family Courts might arrive from that direction.

She feels that she can set aside her fear and return to Britain,  as the political environment is changing.

Another step in the right direction was the recent acquittal of Ben Fellows.

The Child Sex Ring Around Westminster’s Neck

The Child Sex Ring Around Westminster’s Neck

Imagine a pedophile ring that, for years, abused and tormented young boys and girls at a string of VIP brothels. Then imagine that the members of this group were politicians, intelligence officers, diplomats, high-ranking police officers, and prominent civil servants. That this was, in other words, a pedophile ring at the very heart of power, operating with what appears, thanks to 30 years of thwarted investigations and cover-ups, something approaching impunity.

Then imagine that, in addition to what must, appallingly, be considered mere commonplace sexual abuse, it is alleged that this ring was responsible for the deaths — the murders, that is — of at least three teenage children. And no one has yet been prosecuted for playing a part in these alleged offenses.

This might sound like the premise for the next season of a gothic horror story like True Detective. It is, in fact, the long-festering, shattering, scandal that today haunts Westminster and the British government. Most, though not all, of those accused are now dead but the mere thought that powerful interests might have used their influence to thwart justice despite being accused of horrific crimes remains almost too hard to bear. Until recently it might have been thought the preserve of lurid fiction or paranoid conspiracy theory.

Although the primary concern for many lies with securing some form of belated justice for the alleged victims, the scandal also threatens to undermine public confidence in British politics itself. Parliament has suffered already, not least when a House of Commons expenses scandal in 2009 grievously tarnished the reputation of MPs. The public, cynical, and disillusioned need little in the way of fresh excuses for despising their representatives. A 30-year cover-up to protect powerful pedophiles is a different matter, however, and one so gruesome many people would, if only they could, like to ignore it. That’s no longer possible.

The allegations center on a number of children’s homes in London in the 1970s and upon a series of exclusive brothels as well as the Dolphin Square block of apartments in central London, popular with MPs who find it a convenient base for their lives at Westminster. It was there, according to anaccount broadcast on Australian television earlier this month, that senior politicians regularly attended pedophile parties. Among those named were Cyril Smith, a former Liberal MP, and Leon Brittan, who served as home secretary from 1983 to 1985.

What is clear is that the allegations were not taken as seriously as they would be today. In 1996, MI5 finally made a cursory investigation of fresh claims that a leading MP “has a penchant for small boys.” When this was denied by the MP in question, however, the inquiry was abandoned with no further questions asked. According to Sir Anthony Duff, then the head of Britain’s domestic security service, the guilt or innocence of the MP was rather beside the point. In any case, his report concluded, “The risks of political embarrassment is rather greater than the security danger.”

Brittan and Smith are hardly the only prominent figures implicated. They are only one part of a larger scandal in which, it is alleged, the pedophilia of a significant number of senior figures operating in the higher circles of British public life in the 1970s has been willfully suppressed. Among those implicated in the scandal, besides Brittan, are Margaret Thatcher’s former parliamentary private secretary, Sir Peter Morrison, former minister Sir William van Straubenzee, and Sir Peter Hayman, a former diplomat and deputy-director of MI6. All the men are now dead.

The Westminster allegations might be more easily dismissed as so much ancient history if it weren’t for the fact that case after case of historical instances of child abuse have been discovered in Britain in recent years. Most notoriously, it came out that Jimmy Savile, a popular children’s television presenter, was a sexual predator and abuser on an epic scale — a fact that was covered up by his employer, the BBC.

In the mid-1980s, a backbench MP, Geoffrey Dickens, passed the Home Office a “dossier” alleging the existence of a Westminster pedophile ring. Many of the documents in this package subsequently, it is claimed, disappeared. One review of the files concluded there was no evidence of a deliberate cover-up but, nevertheless, proving a negative is much more difficult than establishing its opposite. That helps explain why, last year, Theresa May, the home secretary, told parliament that claims there had been a cover-up would, for the time being, have to be considered “not proven.”

“There might have been a cover-up,” said May. “I cannot stand here and say the Home Office was not involved in a cover-up in the 1980s and that is why I am determined to get to the truth of this.”

May duly launched an inquiry into allegations of “historical child abuse” only to be embarrassed when the first two people appointed to the panel wereforced to resign from the inquiry due to their close ties with establishment figures. It will now be chaired by Lowell Goddard, a judge from New Zealand untainted by links to the British elite. As Simon Danzcuk, a Labour MP and campaigner on the issue, told the BBC in March, “We are on the cusp of finding out exactly what went on in the 70s and 1980s and, I’m sorry to say, I think it will be shown that senior politicians were involved in abuse and there was a cover up. I think that’s inevitable now.”

The Independent Police Complaints Commission is now investigating no fewer than 14 different claims that officers covered-up or otherwise dropped past investigations into alleged child sexual abuse when it became clear powerful and prominent people — including, in some instances, senior police officers — were liable to be implicated in the allegations.

Senior officers have no doubt that at least some of the allegations are credible. Last year, police officers investigating the allegations said that the account given by one witness, named “Nick,” were compelling. “Nick has been spoken to by experienced officers from the child abuse team and experienced officers from the murder investigation team. They and I believe what Nick is saying is credible and true.”

Another alleged victim, Elspeth Baker, who claims to have been abused as a child by an MP and a member of the House of Lords while uniformed police stood guard outside, observes that attitudes have changed. ”People are now not taken by surprise when these allegations come to light. Once they would have been shocked and would not have believed it. Now people have come to terms with this and those who come forward are more likely to be taken serious. That is welcome.”

And yet, for every member of the public who is horrified by the idea that powerful men could have taken advantage of their positions in this fashion, there’s another who, while certainly appalled by this sordidness, also seems to all but relish in it. It confirms their low opinion of the Westminster “elite” and provides an outlet for incandescent indignation. Why, they ask, is the British press so timid about exploring these issues? Why are the guilty men not being exposed?

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Responses to “Sabine’s coming back to Britain”

  1. Nike says:

    “Why, they ask, is the British press so timid about exploring these issues? Why are the guilty men not being exposed?”

    Everybody knows the answer:
    The British media are owned and controlled by same such people and interests.

    • ”At any rate, while I do not seek to persuade others of the validity of this analysis, my working assumption is now that the British Establishment of the past couple of generations was far, far worse than anything its erstwhile (mostly Leftist) detractors ever alleged of it – its moral authority is utterly exploded, there has been a failure to recognize and enforce even the most basic level of human decency.

      To a lesser or greater extent; this taints all of those who are a part of that Establishment, and who have been rewarded by the Establishment – especially the ‘Honours’ System of medals, knighthoods, life peerages and the like. These self-styled honours are coming to seem like badges of complicity.

      I cannot allow much in the way of ‘good intentions’ from such people – rather, it fits with a policy of deliberate, strategic subversion of public morality, especially sexual morality. And this policy has been extremely successful – the depraved Establishment have substantially succeeded in eroding the basic decency, the traditional virtues, of the British public.

      A topic worthy of George Orwell and one which Orwell would instantly have recognized; and lacking an Orwell, a story of the British people that perhaps never will be told. ”

      http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/the-satanic-british-establishment.html

  2. Dogman says:

    I collected data on paedos, their networks and protectors and globally, the pattern is the same. This is more than just a British problem.

    Sabine will no doubt attract the attention of a certain troll who likes to undermine people fighting the system. I was misled by this individual, but I think you have already worked him out on this site. Kudos for that.
    I owe Sabine and Belinda an apology for my mistake and I will tell them the source, who isn’t English, Irish or Scottish, although he is British!

    Apologies for mentioning the troll, but there is a lot of damage being done to the AM by him and his team and I’ve had a couple of years of it.

  3. Dogman says:

    Napoleon knew the score:

    “Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets”

    But there’s little chance of that when 6 Jewish companies control 96% of the world’s media.

    Bear in mind that a Jesuit, Frederick Copleston set up the Alternative Media.

    Small wonder that it’s hard to get the truth out about certain subjects!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.