Government accused of protecting Tory-voting South as every one of the 27 newly-awarded fracking sites is in the North and Midlands

TAP – Another fracking agenda becomes detectable – besides water destruction, and Agenda 21 depopulation/clearance of the countryside.  The break-up of the UK into regions.

POST-

‘It looks suspiciously like the Tories are trying to avoid fracking taking place in their heartlands by pushing as much of it as possible up north’

 

by Tom Bawden

 

The Government has been accused of protecting Conservative-voting southern constituencies from fracking, announcing that the next wave of shale-gas sites would all be in the North and Midlands.

Of the 27 oil and gas licences awarded by the oil and gas regulator, not one covered land south of Leicester. The new licences opened up 1,000 square miles of England to oil and gas exploration around Preston and Bolton, Leeds and Sheffield and Lincoln and Skegness.

The move follows controversy last summer when Lord Howell of Guildford, the former Tory energy minister and George Osborne’s father-in-law, suggested fracking should be limited to the North East of England because it has “large and uninhabited and desolate areas”.

 

A shale fracking facility in Preston

 

A shale fracking facility in Preston (Getty Images)
“It looks suspiciously like the Tories are trying to avoid fracking taking place in their heartlands by pushing as much of it as possible up north,” said Friends of the Earth head of campaigns Andrew Pendleton. “But the North isn’t desolate and as the people of Lancashire have already shown, if the Government thinks it can simply impose fracking on the North to avoid upsetting the southern shires, then it will have to think again.”

“It’s a North-South divide,” said Gayzer Frackman, a campaigner from the Lancashire town of Lytham who changed his surname by deed poll. “It doesn’t matter whether the licences are in the North or the South, we are coming together and the Government is fighting a losing battle.”

 

 

The licences announced on 18 August allow companies such as Centrica-backed Cuadrilla and the French state energy giant GDF Suez to hunt for oil and gas on English land, although they will need further permits to be allowed to frack there.  INEOS, the Swiss chemicals giant which owns the Grangemouth refinery in Scotland, has also been offered three licences – near Sheffield, Chesterfield and Mansfield.

“We are keen to move quickly to evaluate the potential of this resource and determine if we can economically produce gas from our licences,” said Gary Haywood, who runs the company’s fracking operation.

Oil & Gas Authority, the industry regulator, said nothing should be read into the absence of the South – while the Government pointed out that southern areas are under consideration for future licences.

In addition to the licences granted yesterday, the Government will offer up to 159 more in the future, subject to environmental assessment and consultations. About 30 could be for sites in the South – mostly around Bournemouth, Weymouth, Bath, Bristol and Hereford.

Read more: Rise of US fracking causes shift in North Sea oil
Company gains permission to drill for gas in North York Moors
Beer drinkers claim fracking poses ‘threat to quality of real ale’
Fracking turning US into bigger oil producer than Saudi Arabia
Lancashire fracking in doubt following critical report

A handful of oil and gas licences have already been awarded in the South, but these were issued around a decade ago when few people had heard of fracking and the technique had yet to become controversial. Licences have also previously been granted in Lancashire – but last month the county council put a block on commercial drilling by Cuadrilla. The company is appealing.

 

Anti-fracking protesters in Balcombe, in 2013

Anti-fracking protesters in Balcombe, in 2013 (Getty)

Protests in the West Sussex village of Balcombe in 2013 – over fears that a local licence-holder would seek to frack nearby – helped propel fracking into the spotlight. Campaigners suggested yesterday they had made the Government and fracking companies wary of the South.

“According to the Government, the areas today earmarked for fracking are supposed to be uncontroversial. This will be an insult to people who live in the North of England. They will be on the fracking frontline and will face noise, air pollution and threats to local groundwater,” said Greenpeace campaigner Daisy Sands.

A DECC spokesperson said: “Decisions on where to award these oil and gas licenses are made by the independent Oil and Gas authority, not Ministers and it is disingenuous to suggest otherwise.

“The Government has been clear that we are backing the safe development of shale gas because it’s good for jobs, good for our energy security and part of our plan to ensure that the economic potential of all parts of the UK is realised”.

 

Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/government-accused-of-protecting-toryvoting-south-as-every-one-of-the-27-newlyawarded-fracking-sites-is-in-the-north-and-midlands-10461331.html

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Responses to “Government accused of protecting Tory-voting South as every one of the 27 newly-awarded fracking sites is in the North and Midlands”

  1. Aldous says:

    Despicable Me-Cameron (strong language)

    https://twitter.com/Thedyer1971/status/518652654097285120

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BzKf1wlIQAAtoHu.jpg

    Lots of image memes to to wing off to your contact lists:

    https://twitter.com/Thedyer1971

    Note: right click on images and select ‘open image in new tab’ (wording depends on browser being used) to obtain image url. Simples!

  2. Bluefeather6 says:

    A vote of “no confidence” from the people to the so called government whom are nothing more than corporate lobbyists. Public servants, wearing the cuffs, ties – are here, supposedly working for truth and justice FOR the PEOPLE and the EARTH.
    Instead what are we seeing, a shower of numpties serving privilege and power, blackmailed or bankrolled, involving themselves in decision making that could mean the ruin of health of people, animals – destruction of wildlife, water, natural habitat- and through the drilling, earthquakes and all that derives from this ridiculous practice. Do these people not do any research? Are they really that stupid ? Do they and their families not live on the same planet as us?

  3. john says:

    I’ve just come across The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and it makes very interesting reading and interpritation.
    Article 28 (1)– Indigenous People have the right to redress, by means that can include restitution or, compensation, for the lands territories and RESOURCES which they have traditionally owned, occupied or used, and which have been confiscated, taken, occupied, USED or DAMAGED without their FREE, PRIOR and INFORMED CONSENT.
    Article 29 (2)– States shall take effective measures to ensurethat no STORAGE or DISPOSAL of HAZARDOUS materials shall take placein the landsor territories of Indigenous Peoples without their FREE, PRIOR and INFORMED consent.
    Theres lots more but that about sum’s up the case for the use of drinking water and the use of hazardous materials being used against local peoples consent?.
    I know your thinking that these rules were writen to protect Red Indians and Moarie’s but People have live in this country longer than Maorie’s in New Zealand.
    Cameron should be reported to the UN as he takes this course of Genocide.

  4. ian says:

    Nothing surprising here then. Exactly as normal MO. Normally Scotland is the testing ground for any new laws, and for anything that they want well away from London, eg”Trident”, but you folks in the north are now expendable see, everything outsourced, so that African migrants from Libya can replace you.
    We don’t matter and they don’t care, simple as that.

  5. john says:

    Ian everythijng as been outsourced in the English midlands since 1980 and thatcher! No change as you say!

  6. William says:

    $9 Million Fraud Judgment Against Antony Gordon In Federal Court
    This fraud judgment has led to Antony Gordon’s Chapter Seven bankruptcy, which is a straight liquidation.

    This (2:13-ap-01536-DS 1568931 Ontario Ltd., an Ontario (Canada Corporati v. Gordon et al) looks like a $9 million dollar fraud judgment in federal court against Rabbi Chanan (Antony) Gordon (an attorney, motivational speaker, and hedge fund manager).

    http://www.lukeford.net/blog/?p=59030

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.