Shropshire fracking heads into the long grass. National ban could be next.

29E3117D00000578-0-image-a-15_1435055429801

Tim Farron MP could be pivotal in the coming campaign to stop fracking in Britain

Readers occasionally ask for an update on the fracking battles in Shropshire which were hot last summer and were causing great concern.   The sole application to frack in the county happened to be just 300 metres from my business, and as I was informed as to what fracking/coalbed methane extraction entails, thanks to people sending to The Tap, we were quick to launch a campaign of opposition, starting with the local MP Owen Paterson, who at the time was the Secretary of State for the Environment.  Within two months he was sacked by Cameron, possibly partly as a result of our campaign which was hard hitting and suggested Paterson should be gone.  By weakening Owen, we were bringing Cameron into our sights.  Sacking Paterson shot our fox.

Fracking-1

Next came the Shropshire Council, which in May admitted that the Councillors hadn’t yet heard of fracking, and had little idea as to what it entailed for the county.  Yet within months they were able to give 100% rejection of the planning application which threatened the village.  Their knowledge had grown rapidly in the intervening period.

DudlestonCastle-300x200

 

The camp on Brooklands Farm now one year old, featuring Cameron looking horrified by a dead herd of cows that drank fracking-polluted water

As a result of a post on this blog, a group of environmental protection activists travelled down from Chester and informed the farmer they were occupying the field under Section 6 of the Public Order Act.  They were able to get opposition to the drill into the newspapers, and onto the radio nearly every week for months, and build opposition amongst the local community.  They orchestrated a demonstration of over 100 people against the drill during a visit of the Council planning subcommittee, the day before the Committee voted.  This apparently swung the few waverers over to voting against, when they had been unsure prior to seeing a country lane in a sleepy village blocked by concerned locals carrying banners and shouting their opposition outside the vehicle in which the Councillors were travelling.

2798220

Frackfreedudleston filled village halls, while Paterson preferred to stay away.  Opposition from the community was near 100%, yet still the developer wouldn’t withdraw.

Equally the campaign run by Frackfreedudleston has been, and is still crucial.  Every move by the developer to build approval has been strongly and professionally opposed, through the bureaucratic planning steps, and in the media.  The developers have now agreed with FFD that the inquiry into the Council’s refusal to pass the plan can take place some time in 2016.  No mention is made in the media that the farmer’s contract with the developer has already expired (July 12th 2015), and his contract makes it quite clear that the developer no longer has any right of access to the proposed drilling site.  Given that circumstance it is hardly surprising that the developer is no longer exercised to push through the Inquiry.  The farmer appears not be interested in signing another contract.

UPDATE – This was confirmed when the farmer Mr Paul Hickson was interviewed on Radio Shropshire today the 15th July 2015.  This finally concluded the business over his farm, and he said categorically that he will not be renewing his contract with Dart Energy who now have no right of access to the site.

rsz_chris_hesketh_1_rgb

Chris Hesketh of Frackfreedudleston 

THE NATIONAL PICTURE

The game is not over finally though until the situation in Parliament changes, as an element of compulsion could yet be introduced.

That said, the Liberal Democrats are selecting their leader on the 16th July and the betting/polling indicate that Tim Farron is the likely winner.  He has already made public statements that he will be reviewing LD policies to make them more liberal.  He has also voiced opposition to fracking.  His winning of the Party leadership should before long make the Lib Dems the next party after the Greens to be in opposition to unconventional gas drilling in Britain.  UKIP were a great disappointment in this regard and they missed a trick at the General Election by supporting the Conservative pro-fracking policy.  Carswell is still making pro-fracking noises btw, as is Paterson, who has obviously not yet learned his lesson either.

My own video attacking Owen Paterson,our local MP and then Secretary Of State for the Environment

The Lib Dem policy, which could pull support from many constituencies if it actually happens, will trouble Labour, and Andy Burnham has already made anti-fracking/anti-drilling noises.  If he wins the Labour leadership, it is possible, though by no means a certainty, that with Conservative rebels and the SNP, along with Lib Dem, a majority of MPs could be willing to vote against fracking within a few months, and bring in a UK ban, as has happened in many other countries.

http://www.libdemvoice.org/tim-farron-writes-zero-carbon-britain-put-at-risk-by-conservatives-46760.html

http://tapnewswire.com/?s=tim+farron

As regards the Labour leadership contest, the front-runner is said to be Jeremy Corbyn by The New Statesman.  If that forecast correct, he is totally in favour of a national fracking moratorium.

Jeremy-Corbyn

Jeremy is totally opposed to fracking because he believes that ”Fracking is dangerous to the environment and causes water pollution.”. In June 2012, he sponsored an Early Day Motion in parliament calling for a moratorium on fracking.

That this House believes a moratorium should be placed on onshore and offshore exploration, development and production of shale gas via the…
PARLIAMENT.UK
If Labour, Lib Dem, SNP and Green lump their MPs together in support of a moratorium, there would only be the need for about fifteen rebels from government ranks.  There could well be many more than that number willing to break ranks to get rid of this running sore.
The betting suggests Andy Burnham will be the next leader currently.  He’s proposed a fracking moratorium
The problem leader for Labour would be Yvette Cooper.  She’s pro-fracking, but sits second in the betting not far behind Andy Burnham.  If Corbyn or Burnham makes it, a national moratorium is job-on.
UPDATE – Is the SNP playing a double game over fracking?

INEOS chairman Jim Ratcliffe has received private assurances from the SNP that it does not oppose fracking, he claimed yesterday.

The Switzerland-based billionaire said his business was given the nod earlier this year during private talks with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon — on the same day her party confirmed a moratorium on the damaging extraction process.

Mr Ratcliffe believes that an onshore shale gas industry could be operating commercially as early as 2018.

Ineos currently holds fracking exploration licences across 700 miles of Scotland, and will soon be seeking formal approval to begin drilling and carrying out seismic testing, which Mr Ratcliffe is confident will not breach the terms of the moratorium.

Frack Off Fife activist Tam Kirby told the Star that Mr Ratcliffe’s announcement “does not come as a major surprise.

“The SNP has always been very cagey when responding to queries regarding unconventional gas extraction.

“Now is the time for the SNP to come clean on the whole matter.

“If Ratcliffe is wrong, then the SNP needs to now change from having a moratorium on fracking to a complete and outright ban.”

Friends of the Earth Scotland’s Dr Richard Dixon added: “Nicola Sturgeon urgently needs to publish a note of their meeting and make a statement on what she did and didn’t say to the Ineos boss.”

A Scottish government spokesperson said that these revelations were simply what had already been said publicly on the issue, namely that “no fracking can or will take place in Scotland while the moratorium we have announced remains in place, a policy that has received wide support from both environmental groups and industry.”

http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/a-9e37-SNP-assured-Ineos-it-backs-fracking#.ValduipVhHx

The SNP not voting against fracking would change the arithmetic substantially.   You’d need over fifty Conservative/SNP rebels if these parties went against a moratorium.   That’s where a Lib DEm revival could be powerful, if Tim Farron works the fracking issue to rebuild his party, as well as electoral reform, which he’s playing as his first pitch to the marketplace.

imgID3461409

Keith Barrow, Leader of Shropshire Council, has led opposition to fracking at the Council and in the media, along with Councillor Steve Davenport

Meantime, with no certainty as to a national ban, Shropshire Council should be planning a move to a fracking ban across the county.  They can only do this once there are no current applications to frack/drill in process.  That could be another reason why the developer is happy for the Inquiry over Brooklands to be timed sometime next year.  The ending of the Brooklands battle might allow the County a window to bring in a ban, and that is something the frackers want to avoid at any cost.

As regards our own very local battle to save our village and our jobs, farms and businesses, we are currently optimistic, but as the above explains, we are by no means complacent, and there is still much to do to finally remove this ugly threat to our environment and our futures.

Bulletin from FrackFree Dudleston this evening

Dear Supporter
We have had a busy few weeks recently, culminating in some excellent news.
First the planning appeal was upgraded to Inquiry by the Planning Inspectorate after they’d received our statement of case, thus showing that they are giving our points very serious consideration.  This then allowed us to become the Rule 6 participants in the process.
Then Shropshire Council appointed an expert team of consultants to fight their case.  Because the council’s team was appointed close to the submission deadline they requested an extension to the deadline.  This has been granted and you may have read about it in the local papers.  If the Inquiry runs its full course then it could be 2016 before we get the planning decision.
And now the latest news is that the Access Licence with Mr Hickson which allowed access to the site has lapsed.  This alone means that the drilling will not take place and hence the Dudleston Community Protection Camp have started to dismantle their camp.
The planning process is ongoing but becomes slightly irrelevant given that, even if granted, it could not be used.  The final result of course will be the moment when the planning application is refused.
As you know, the local papers are excellent and we are sending them the press release at the foot of this email.
Best Wishes
from the team at FrackFreeDudleston
Press release from FrackFreeDudleston:FrackFreeDudleston, along with the Dudleston Community Protection Camp, would like to make the following announcement.  The proposed CBM test drilling will not now happen because the Access Licence with Mr Hickson, the landowner, has lapsed.  When Dart Energy started the process of applying for permission to drill in spring 2014 they thought that the actual drilling would take place that autumn.  The residents of the Dudleston area looked into the proposals with an open mind and then almost unanimously concluded that it was seriously bad news for the community and the environment and would not provide a meaningful source of energy for the country.  Since then Defra have been forced to publish their own research showing that communities will indeed suffer.  The modest amounts of money being promised to local councils as a softener for granting permission will do nothing to mitigate the impact on the people who live nearby.The planning application was contested by the whole community and is continuing its slow and tortuous passage through the planning appeal process. Now that the Access Licence with Mr Hickson has lapsed, it is technically possible for Dart to win the appeal and end up with a permission that they have no ability to utilise.  FrackFreeDudleston, on behalf of the community, are confident that that won’t happen and are working with Shropshire Council to present a thoroughly robust case that should establish a national precedent for an unconventional gas application being refused planning permission at appeal.In July 2014, the Dudleston Community Protection Camp arrived at the site with the aim of physically preventing any drilling from taking place, as had happened in other areas around the UK.  In Chester the planning permission was granted over a year ago and has still not been implemented because a similar community protection camp was established on the site and remains there today.  That is happily no longer going to be necessary here and we would like to thank Yellow and his colleagues on behalf of the community for their dedication to the cause.An important question is whether the threat of drilling to find gas has gone away from this area for good.  There are no certainties, however we have established that this area is geologically unsuitable.  We have also established that we have a very united community, willing to stand up for itself in defence of the rural way of life that we enjoy.  Almost all landowners in the area now understand the harm that would be inflicted by even just test drilling for gas and they know that they would be letting everyone else down if they were to sign up.  Provided we remain united, the threat has pretty much gone away.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Responses to “Shropshire fracking heads into the long grass. National ban could be next.”

  1. Men Scryfa says:

    Henry, Gordon, Jen take a look at this. It tells us where they have us headed,

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01hbkh4hXEk

    • Gordon says:

      Clearly Illuminati NWO rhetoric of their future world vision. What’s really needed in the world is love and harmony, being one with God and nature and at peace with our fellow mankind. No mention of that, just get, get, and more get for “millions” instead of billions.
      Their illusion is that technology, nanotechnology, robotics and nano-robotics can bring peace and harmony to the world,they delude themselves in a lie.

  2. Gordon says:

    Thank’s for the update Henry, I’ll keep tabs on this for 2016.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.