Who was on the plane?

>www.Jimstone.is images

Here is the scenario they decided to peddle
One pilot left the cockpit and could not get in. The other pilot was not responsive until the plane crashed. An arab type terror scenario has been implied, that the pilot in the cockpit suicide crashed the plane ON PURPOSE. PROBLEM. HUGE PROBLEM

HOW DOES THAT EXPLAIN THE FIGHTER JET ESCORTS THEY EXPUNGED FROM REPORTS, FIGHTER JETS THAT ARE CUTELY CAPTURED AND SHOWN REPORTED BELOW ON THIS VERY PAGE? If you have not seen this, scroll down to the captures
This was their “flight recorder discovery” and if you believe that line, I have a bag of moon rocks.
Bottom line? They know they are nailed and this is the only scenario they have other than a remote controlled crash that can possibly fit what happened – an autopilot disabling followed by a perfectly controlled power descent straignt into a mountain. Either they explain it this way, or the are FORCED TO ADMIT THIS WAS A REMOTE CONTROL WHACK JOB. FAT CHANCE THEY EVER WILL

If they try to back peddle from the “pilot crashed it on purpose” angle and just say the pilot passed out, that is a fail because autopilot was in control and even in the extremely likely event it was not in control, absent a pilot a plane will keep flying straight and level until it runs out of fuel. It will not go into a dive by itself.

The biggest problem they can never overcome is the fighter jets that followed it until it hit the mountain, and then, rather than assess the situation, they bugged out. THAT SAYS IT ALL, they cannot back track from that cold hard fact.
They really are stuck with the suicide crash option. Will people believe it? NOT IF THEY KNOW ABOUT THE FIGHTER JETS. ARCHIVE AND POST!
It looks to me like Germany paid some “holocaust reparations” with an airplane!
Germanwings downing a legitimate black op
This is easy to tell, because now there are many theories popping up to divert and distract. There is one new theory, however, that got my interest and may actually be a clue if it is legit. This theory is that the fighter jets shot the A320 right before impact with the mountain and it was smoking as it hit. This could be plausible for the following reason:

The A320 is a full fly by wire aircraft. If a pilot pushes a pedal or pulls a lever, it is not hooked up to the mechanics in any way whatsoever. And if this A320 was equipped with collision avoidance, this full fly by wire attribute most likely would not have allowed it to hit the mountain, most likely it would have pulled up on time and missed. If this is the case, then the fighter jets would have been needed to shoot the tail flaps out, which are needed to make the aircraft pull up and if the tail is disabled, the collision avoidance would not have been able to stop the crash.

Absent the tail, the plane could still proceed at full throttle into the mountain and whatever debris came off the tail would most likely have simply followed the plane into the mountain and not left a separate debris path. This fits the eyewitness scenario quite well, and would explain the roaring sound people heard continue for several seconds, this could have easily been caused by a missile launch to blow the tail out.

Other scenarios, such as a laser brought it down are in my opinion just diversions, but I will certainly give the scenario of smoke coming from the aircraft after it was shot while approaching the mountain fair consideration. Fighter jets and collision avoidance disabling certainly fit that scenario.

After all
Why would the fighter jets be there to begin with, and then leave the scene immediately after a crash that would have been obvious to them? No aircraft, even an ultralight, would go unnoticed by a fighter jet designed to hunt and kill, THEY KNEW THAT CRASH HAPPENED, WHY DID THEY LEAVE THE SCENE IMMEDIATELY? If they did not cause it, it would have been their job to stick around, assess the situation and report back to the base what the situation was. They did not do this, BIG QUESTION: WHY NOT?
Mails being tampered with – if you are trying to get through with information and are not seeing it here, it is because it got blocked. I have found what might be a good mail provider and will try to circumvent this problem.

“It is inexplicable how such a thing could happen to a technically perfect aircraft with experienced, trained at Lufthansa pilots” – Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr

MY RESPONSE: IT IS NOT INEXPLICABLE, READ THE FOLLOWING:
New info on Germanwings crash
It has now been determined that the descent was a perfectly controlled full throttle dive of a perfectly working aircraft straight into the side of a mountain. And I know how it happened, details below.
Why no identifiable bodies? I got the answer:
Many people on the web are asking where the people are and how an airplane can just “vanish” into such tiny pieces. I have the answer. The crash was done in a way that caused the bodies to be erased so no person outside the controlled group of investigators could possibly identify anyone on the flight.
How do you cause bodies to vanish and an airplane to turn into such small pieces?
By having the crash occur at a very high speed. And this particular crash happened at 600 plus MPH.

A 600 plus MPH impact is proven by how badly the plane shredded. And 600 plus MPH crashes do not happen outside of willful intent.

Chris wrote:
About the remote control capabilities of the 757/767 aircraft, you are right. They were revolutionary aircraft, and Popular Science covered their release in detail in the early 1980’s. In one of the many reports they did, they talked about how the aircraft were hijack proof and ground controllable. I cannot find anything on this now, it seems 911 has done away with history and the report that mentioned this is not on the web. Someone is going to have to dig through the basement to find it in print.

My response:
I had a subscription to Popular science at that time and remember this. Additionally, in 2002 I accidentally got into a secure area of the Boeing web site where pilots were posting about this system and how it had been removed from all the aircraft after 911. Those who had experience with airbus said the system was still in A320 aircraft because Airbus had not been compromised (their coding was more secure).

And this would explain why the fighter jets which accompanied this Germanwings flight all the way to it’s death and then left the scene did not shoot it down, even though it is more than obvious they were either responsible for the crash or ordered to witness it. If erasing bodies and making them unidentifiable to all but a very controlled group of investigators was needed to conceal who was on that flight, remote controlling the aircraft into a mountain after a steep dive at full throttle would be the best way to do it, and now investigators at the scene have said the largest body part they have found is the size of a briefcase. Absolutely no one can be visually identified.

Normal plane crashes do not have such small debris and erased bodies because pilots slow the plane down and it crashes at around 200 mph, not 600 plus.

Beyond all doubt, the fighter aircraft were responsible for this crash and whoever ordered this crash wanted the bodies erased. This is why the fighter jets did not shoot the plane down even though they were clearly responsible for it’s demise. If they had shot the plane, it would have fallen in large pieces and would have had the bodies be intact. By using remote to crash the plane after a full throttle dive, they ensured a perfect crash scene with obliteration of evidence.
This is why no communication with the pilots happened, they were totally blacked out even after the tower declared an emergency and made repeated attempts to contact the pilots long before the crash actually happened and received no response. This is highly unusual, if not completely unprecedented except for the other obvious government jobs, – 911 and flight 370.

They are testing conspiracies to see what will work to fool the public on forums and blogs right now, before releasing “what the black boxes said.” The most prevalent theory for why the pilots were silent is slow depressurization blacked everyone out with no one noticing. This is bunk.

FOR THE RECORD: The plane peaked out at 38,000 feet, stayed there for ONE MINUTE, and then did it’s death dive. That is not long enough to black out everyone from a loss of cabin pressure, or “slowly depressurize the cabin” and once the plane hit 25,000 feet, people would have woken up even if this theory is what happened. It is an obvious hoax theory. The plane was simply not high enough long enough for this theory to hold any water.

Unfiltered mail blurbs from mails that made it.
Hello, Jim. This info. ought to be good for a sarcastic comment vis-a-vis sep 11 – might want to consider the remnants look like confetti, but the plane in 5 side polygon was claimed it drove through multi-foot thick reinforced concrete walls in a row and 2 others punched through steel framed towers, too. Shouldn’t we then see a 40 foot deep divot hole in the mountainside? tim

_____

Come back to you again with this. Check the flight path radar. At video 016 it is getting hazy (why?). At 019 you still see the big plane on the right of GWI/18G …. At 020 this plane is vanished. AWAKS could do that – you know that better tan me cause you are the specialist. Looks for me like a warning to Merkel concerning not following US instructions concerninbg WW III ….. Please check ….https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7PYLmKg8jM

P.S.: The flight had been directed over the Alps, pretty far away from the direct route. There, where the plane came down, no French citizens could be hit.

_____

you asked the question Who was on the plane?

In the news moments ago they said that there have been two engineers of Delphi on board of this plane.

Maybe it might be a small piece of info but to get the full pic we need to put them all together.

www.Jimstone.is

______

Update 22:28 GMT
Does this figure of Co-pilot look inserted into background ie faked? The BBC are pushing this story.
images

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-32063587

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

27 Responses to “Who was on the plane?”

  1. paul.leake-norfolk says:

    its being said on various forums that the jews did it as a\ warning to germany to keep feeding the EU bailouts

  2. Jennifer says:

    We have mentioned this link before and it may well be relevant to the what’s going on with these global players.

    http://eventhorizonchronicle.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/hey-obama-chess-match-just-started.html

  3. Do we need to be careful about the person who calls himself “Jim Stone”?

    “Yes” some people have already said!

    Could it be that he is controlled opposition giving sensational fake news to misguide people?

    There are countless people like “Jim Stone” running blogs and/or writing articles to hijack blogs of other people.

    One such person is someone who calls himself a “Scott” by the name of “Professor Hudson McLean”. This person has totally hijacked the website: Lankaweb” which was set up to support the cause of Sinhala Buddhist Nationals who are on the verge of losing their homeland: Sri Lanka where a puppet regime has been installed by the NWO architects backed by the US, Israel, Britain, India and Norway – The real Axes of Evil.

    “Professor Hudson McLean” is anti – Muslim and pro Israel and he has quite cunningly got rid of the patriotic Sinhala Nationalists from making comments by insulting them and by getting his pals to insult them.

    • Aldous says:

      Veteran’s Today seems to be going along with the official line that ‘it was the co-pilot wot dun it’. VT has also been accused of being ‘controlled opposition’. Sowing distrust is the Zionist name of the game here.

      I’ve never known any air accident investigation like it where there has been such a flagrant drip, drip release of information. It all stinks to the high heavens. The Washington Post is now reporting(sic) that a third pilot is needed on the flight deck to prevent such future atrocities. The co-pilot – a victim like all the others in my mind until proven otherwise – has been hung out to dry it seems and a post death trial by controlled media is well underway to hide the real cause.

      Air accident investigations are NEVER run like this. The final report can take months – years in some cases. Why was the Captain away from the flight deck anyway, especially so soon after reaching cruising height of FL380? Note: Flight Levels (such as FL380 in this case) are used so that all planes are at exactly the designated/indicated level, even if that level is not exactly the QNH for 38,000 feet at that time. The altimeters are set to the International Mean Sea Level Standard pressure setting of 1013.2 mbars ensuring this.

      In the USA, a flight attendant has to replace one of the pilots on the flight deck when either pilot is away for any reason. When you think about it, it does seem a bit odd that a single pilot is allowed to be left at the controls, especially with re-access to the flight deck capable of being prevented. I’m certain that such a scenario did NOT happen in this case and the very fact that this scenario is now being peddled by the mendacious msm is good enough reason to dismiss it out of hand.

      The witnessed fighter jets and a remote controlled flight by them of the Germanwings plane into terrain is a far more likely scenario. What bastards are born to even think of doing something like this but we know they are out there and that is their Achilles Heel.

      • Jennifer says:

        Honestly Aldous, you’d think they would have us believe that pilots don’t have to undergo regular health and psychiatric tests, wouldn’t you?
        Obviously they just let nut jobs just run rampant with their billion dollar industry every day.
        In all of these suspect cases, the more they try to fill in the cracks of their crackpot theories the more the holes gape even larger. Cos they are not very bright really. Sadistic, evil, yes, but really very stupid.

      • Aldous says:

        Hi Jennifer – I can’t reply using the icon to your comment as it is disabled.

        The Silence of Murder
        An unspeakable crime. A voiceless defendant.

        Cui bono? Who benefits?

        MEANS, MOTIVE, & OPPORTUNITY

        The killer must have had means to murder, something to have murdered the victim with. And the murderer needed to have been able to wield the weapon or shoot the gun or use that knife. [or that aeroplane!]

        The killer needs a good motive to do what he or she does. The writer needs to make that motive clear in the end, but sprinkle clues throughout. [I think this is the weak link in this absurd killer co-pilot scenario but no doubt the Illuminati/Usual Suspects together with their complicit media presstitutes will do a good hatchet job on the co-pilot. Will the sheeple fall for it? I think we know the answer to that one.]

        The killer must have had an opportunity to commit the murder. In the end, the plot [or pilot even!] has to work—the killer did have that opportunity. But the writer needs to show cracks in the killer’s alibi here and there throughout the story. No fair simply springing the truth in the end that the killer had a body double, or that her alibi lied for no good reason, or that oops, the police must have gotten the time wrong.

        http://www.silenceofmurder.com/index.php/plot-vs-character/11-means-motive-a-opportunity

        In US Criminal law, means, motive, and opportunity is a popular cultural summation of the three aspects of a crime that must be established before guilt can be determined in a criminal proceeding. Respectively, they refer to: the ability of the defendant to commit the crime (means), the reason the defendant felt the need to commit the crime (motive), and whether or not the defendant had the chance to commit the crime (opportunity). Opportunity is most often disproved by use of an alibi, which can prove the accused was not able to commit the crime as he or she did not have the correct set of circumstances to commit the crime as it occurred. Motive is not an element of many crimes, but proving motive can often make it easier to convince a jury of the elements that must be proved for a conviction.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Means,_motive,_and_opportunity

      • mossad says:

        “Veteran’s Today seems to be going along with the official line that ‘it was the co-pilot wot dun it’. VT has also been accused of being ‘controlled opposition’. Sowing distrust is the Zionist name of the game here. ”

        You literally just sowed distrust in VT yourself and then complained about Zionists sowing distrust. You can’t even follow your own logic.

        No-one who comments here seems to know anything about the world or how it works. You don’t let through comments by anyone but Yes Men and Con Men.

        You’ll always be ignorant if you refuse to listen to people who actually live and work in the real world.

        Your site is a bubble.

  4. tom74 says:

    Of course, it is possible the co-pilot was a maniac.
    But I’m disturbed by the haste with which he has been blamed, just as with MH370, before there seems to be sufficient evidence of his intent or motives. We’re presented with the co-pilot’s apparent depression as a reason for him to down a plane and murder a plane-load of innocent passengers – but I’m not sure there is such a link, even if he had suicidal thoughts.
    Also I find the accounts of the black box recordings strangely unconvincing. The idea that the passengers would be unaware of the pilot trying to get back into the cockpit are obvious nonsense, and surely he would have asked for assistance to batter the door down. And would the recordings really pick up screams from the cabin?
    The story seems too pat, too contrived and easy. Possibly further details may make it more credible but at present I’m not convinced.

    • Aldous says:

      Tom, they wouldn’t have been able to batter down the cockpit door as they have been reinforced to prevent such a thing since 9/11. The SilkAir crash of 19 December 1997 has me wondering though, if they are following this particular template of one pilot being locked out of the cockpit while mass murder/suicide ensues.

      SilkAir Flight 185 was a scheduled SilkAir passenger flight from Jakarta, Indonesia, to Singapore, which crashed into the Musi River near Palembang in southern Sumatra, Indonesia, on 19 December 1997, killing all 97 passengers and seven crew members on board.

      There was great controversy as to the cause of the crash, which was investigated by two separate agencies independent of each other. Given that the aircraft was built by Boeing in the United States, the United States’ National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) under lead investigator Greg Feith, participated in the investigation of the crash, and made a conclusion from its interpretation of the absent black box data, that the crash was the result of deliberate flight control inputs, most likely by the captain. However, the Indonesian National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC) led by Engineering Professor Oetarjo Diran stated in its report that it could not determine a cause of the crash due to inconclusive evidence.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SilkAir_Flight_185

      That crash was a week less a day before Christmas 1997 and now has me wondering if the Illuminati was responsible for that heinous crime and the Captain was in fact a patsy/fall guy.

      This latest crash/tragedy just happens to have occurred in the run-up to Easter with tomorrow being a week before Good Friday. Lockerbie happened a few days before Christmas and of course the UK had the Glasgow bin lorry crash – an obvious hoax – a few days before Christmas just gone. The Luciferian worshipping Illuminati HATE Christ and all He represents and it is of little significance whether or not the masses believe in God or Christ. The Satanists of the Illuminati believe in the Light and Dark sides and have chosen the Dark Side of Evil. Once this penny drops, realising that there is in fact a Force for Good out there to combat their Evil, becomes ever more apparent and visible. Unfortunately, many (if not most) think they will find it in satanic controlled religion, when the very opposite in fact is true.

  5. Claire says:

    Where is your evidence of fighter jets? I am missing something here.

    • Aldous says:

      http://tinyurl.com/ns9zmc6

      Claire, it’s not evidence of course but are you suggesting that all French fighter jets were on the ground during this 10 minute event – a lifetime in fighter aviation terms? A bit like the opposite of all USAF fighter planes being conspicuous by their absence during the 9/11 attacks? It’s called ‘eyewitness accounts’ on the ground as opposed to the BSTV we are being subjected to and to which most out there accept hook, line and sinker while questioning the credibility of those who actually saw what happened.

  6. Is there any chance that this plane crash could be a hoax?

    Here is important information from DavidDuke.com but unrelated to the plane crash.

    Dr David Duke says and I agree:

    The Jewish elite in media, government and academia are constantly attacking Europeans for real and imagined sins of history, while completely ignoring the paramount Jewish role in many of the greatest crimes of history. As I have pointed out many times, Jews were the creators and driving force behind communism which oppressed, tortured and murdered more human beings in just the 20th Century than in all of the rest of the entire recorded history of mankind!

    While Jews constantly demonize Whites for slavery, they don’t point out that every nation has enslaved other peoples and races historically. Even more importantly, they don’t point out the horrific slave trade since Roman Times has been completely dominated by Jews, a tiny percent of the population. The Jewish tribe is the world champion of slavery!

  7. If anyone is interested…

    There has been a discussion about the recent plane crash in the comments section of this NoDisinfo.com article:

    http://nodisinfo.com/suicide-bombings-in-yemen-are-total-fakes-proof/

  8. Lynn says:

    3 Planes in less than ayear… think someone is making a point to the Merkle Hollande Putin meeting !! this is what you get for thinking you can outsmart them. They have taken these lives for a reason. !!

  9. Freeborn says:

    The indecently threadbare cover story they’re peddling is, as far as I can ascertain, found believable by the comatose masses.

    Our benighted fellow creatures will ingest and regurgitate any recyclable junk the MSN spews out.

    Some Primary teachers I heard today thought the circumstances of the recent air crash bore uncanny similarities to what happened on 911!

    What are these brain-dead gobshites doing teaching our kids for God’s sake?

  10. Gary says:

    They explain the dive as the co-pilot pressing a ‘descent’ button to enable a controlled steep descent should there be an emergency such as depressurization. Further they say that proximity alarms went off when approaching the mountainside but these don’t prevent, simply warn. Personally, if I wanted to kill an individual or small number of people I would not use an air crash, its the type of thing that gets a bit too much publicity. An individual having a heart attack goes unnoticed.

  11. “Leading conspiracist intellectual” thanks French President By Dr Kevin Barrett

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/26/dearfrancois/

  12. dofornow says:

    Another one of our planes is missing!
    There is a whif of PC about this one.
    dofornow.

  13. Adam Lightworker says:

    Hollande, Merkel, look genuinely grief stricken and distraught. Im surprised. I used to think all elite leaders in power were against us.
    Obviously this isn’t the case, not black and white. Maybe these leaders, even though they must practice occult knowledge too (which makes me distrust them, the elites should level with us, be open about whats really going on)
    but maybe these 3 leaders, really are backed by factions that took a stand against the NWO and satanic child killing types? With their geopolitics, foreign policy change?
    If only RT or a German mainstream outlet could start to leak, seriously raise the remote question, to plant the seeds in peoples minds, the War going on under our noses involves plane crashes like this. And how they do it too
    Then we might be onto a Breakthrough

  14. RabbiT says:

    Anyone have a problem with the official take that the co-pilot crashed it deliberately?

    Could it be the official position was true on this occasion and I know we can’t believe the media but surely on the odd occasion the truth is all they have to give us as there was no hidden agenda on that occasion?#

    Thoughts please…

  15. Hard Proof Germanwings Crash is a Hoax – Orchestrated by Zionists

    Notice the deposition of the wreckage in a linear pattern, fully demonstrating human intervention as the source. It took teams of men to do this. The Zionist-controlled German and Spanish governments are fully complicit in this scam. It’s just garbage and fake strewn plane wreckage planted about. There’s nothing real about it.

    http://nodisinfo.com/hard-proof-germanwings-crash-is-a-hoax-orchestrated-by-zionists/

    • Tom says:

      I think that’s far-fetched.
      There was a crash but the real reasons are being hidden with this cover story of the suicidal pilot. My guess is the crash was carried out to put covert pressure on Germany by Israel or the Americans but there could be other reasons to cover up the cause of the tragedy, such as a design fault in the plane.

  16. paul.leake-norfolk says:

    ISRAELS TERRORISM AND TYRANNY IS BUILT ON THE HOLOCAUST THIS BRAND NEW INFO DEMOLOSHED IT FOR GOOD
    http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=32992

  17. Bill says:

    VT have put out info that describes the facts could be ‘hoax’, they give link to a site that shows the cockpit door can be accessed from outside > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/27/350535/ They also pedal the Fly-by Wire scenario. I came across a post on the net 2 weeks ago, that indicated some form of False Flag may be coming, as Germany & France weren’t on board with US arming Ukraine?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.