The Queen’s Christmas Message deciphered

Comment from Ade:

I confess I couldn’t be arsed to listen to Queenie’s speech however the author of this piece is in my opinion iffy.

For starters the author incorrectly conflates the Crown with The Crown Corporation( City of Thieves)  and ignores the fact that in the UK power lies in the hands of the executive  in govt & even within the Privy Council. Queenie is in effect a ceremonial rubber stamper albeit with some influence.

Christopher Everard also has a string of domains (25) registered in his name, many hosted in Arizona ( John McCain territory )  most of which seem tailored to extracting money from fools under the guise of peddling enlightened knowledge, in that respect flogging books, DVDs, subscriptions, he reminds me of zionist Stratfor stooge Alex Jones.

Clearly the monarch and family as mere humans should under no circumstances be above the law and like anyone else be answerable for their actions and activities, in that context Prince Andrew springs immediately to mind for some reason.

However I sense a suspicious pattern to  this monarch bashing.

If we separate the the institution of the monarchy from the mortals we find the monarchy is key to the constitution and Common Law in which our rights are enshrined for all time should we be man enough to defend them. If some nefarious entity wished to abrogate Common Law then one easy route might be to tarnish the monarchy via human compromise and propaganda as a political entity and impose a new constitution.   We already see a parliament populated with treasonous bolshevik political whores denying the fact that we have a constitution and their signalled intention to impose a new constitution. It is no coincidence that jewish monelenders imposed the Dutchman gay King Billy upon the nation and formed The Crown Corporation to enslave the nation to usury and debt. It is also no coincidence that that embodiment of power has the most to gain from dumping Common Law and imposing outright financial dictatorship / EU roman or admiralty law.

Plugging Christopher Everard into Google returns among other hits this: a Ripoff Report, on which one finds a rather convoluted story, but one thing both the principal posters agree on is that Chris Everard is a fraud and a conman. Among other sordid details, he is quoted as telling people that his site is “easy money from people who buy into this shit.” Everything about his websites suggests that this is the sole motivation there.

When people talk about the Crown, they often believe that they’re referring to the British monarchy. But contrary to popular belief The Crown and the British monarchy are two different entities, the Crown is in fact a privately owned corporation, it operates outside the realms of the British legal system and controls the inner City Of London. The City Of London is often referred to as the square mile, It is currently recognised as the financial capital of the world and is the wealthiest square mile on the planet.

With its own independent flag, laws & legislations, and its own privately owned police force, The Crown is an authority unto itself, it is a self-governing body, therefore, no government or governmental agency holds jurisdiction over The Crown or the inner city of london.

To further understand this concept it’s essential to understand that the British empire has been broken up into two interlocking factions. One being the Commonwealth realm, which is directed by the Queen as head of state, for which she appoints a Prime Minister, and the other being the Crown territory which is directed by the Lord Mayor on behalf of the Crown Corporation of London.
http://independencedaily.wordpress.com/2012/04/01/new-post/

POST

By Christopher Everard

european bloodlines face end-time vortex of exposure

THE QUEEN’S Christmas Message… Is usually recorded about four weeks before Christmas. Because the Queen is married to a German family, and her ancestor, Prince Albert of Saxe Coburg spoke German, wrote all letters of state in German and that her own nephew was a spy selling British secrets to the Germans, the Queen uses the Christmas Day broadcast to make us think she is wholly British and a Christian.

Her actual family come from Saxony and Bavaria – more of her ancestors are German than British.

Her Christmas Day speech usually includes references to British religious landmarks, such as this year when her speech stated “In the ruins of the old Coventry Cathedral is a sculpture of a man and a woman reaching out to embrace each other. The sculptor was inspired by the story of a woman who crossed Europe on foot after the war to find her husband. Casts of the same sculpture can be found in Belfast and Berlin, and it is simply called Reconciliation”.

(…) The Queen is not just the Queen of Britain, she is the queen of a vast empire called theCommonwealth.

Her name is not ‘Windsor’ – on 18th of July 1917, the Times newspaper carried a royal proclamation introducing the name “Windsor” and dropping “all German titles” held by the royal family at Buckingham Palace. Britain’s royal family were known as the Dukes, Kings and Queens of “Saxe-Coburg-Gotha”. In a time of brutal war with Germany, a more German family name would be hard to find.

By 1915, with the first world war almost a year old, the horrific sinking of the cruise-ship Lusitania by a German submarine – with the loss of almost 1,200 lives – a fresh wave of anti-German outrage emerged in Britain and in the USA. The consequences for Germans in Britain were grave – and so, being German, the queen’s grand-parents and great-grandparents created a fake name which they use to this day; ‘WINDSOR’.

Today, our present queen is the queen to peoples on all corners of planet earth – and she earns TAXES from far a field, such as sheep farm workers in Australia and tourism businesses in the many Caribbean islands which the queen owns as part of the ‘commonwealth’.

Her close relatives control the thrones of Spain, Netherlands and her brother-in-law’s family controlled the intelligence/spy networks of the NAZI Third Reich. She is married to her own cousin, and he owns an enormous private estate in the Holstein-Schleisweg district on the border between northern Germany and Scandinavia. The queen hires and fires the head of the BBC and several other prominent jobs in Britain. Her family’s financial affairs are forbidden from public discussion and she can recall and dissolve parliament whenever she likes. Her cousin is DAVID CAMERON, and there are strong Germanic-Jewish ties to our ‘British’ royal family.

Where does her money come from? It comes in the form of TAXES which are earned from millions of people’s wage-packets. The Queen also earns millions each year from her private estate which is centred on the county of Lancaster.

THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER

In addition to the total monarchial control of the Inland Revenue, Royal Mint and Crown Estates, the British monarchy have their own personal land estates – these are properties which at no time can be claimed by the British People and are always, under rule of law, considered to be private estates. One such estate is the vast Duchy of Lancaster which consists of 46,200 acres (18,700 hectares) which includes hamlets, villages, towns, historic buildings, and farm land right across England and Wales.

As of fiscal year 2007, the Duchy of Lancaster is valued at £397 million, earning Queen Elizabeth an officially stated net profit of £11.9 million – or, put another way, she has a private income from this Duchy equivalent to nearly £33,000 per day. Income tax is paid voluntarily on all profits from the Duchy of Lancaster.

The duchy is not the property of ‘The Crown’ (which is a label used to perpetuate the pretence that British People own the property) but is instead the personal property of the monarch and has been since 1399, when the Dukedom of Lancaster, held by Henry of Bolingbroke merged with the crown on his appropriation of the throne (after the dispossession from Richard II). This area of Britain is populated by some of the poorest families in Europe, with disgusting living conditions. Elevators full of piss are a common sight, and vandalism and graffiti is, perhaps, a subconscious reaction to the immense inequality witnessed in this region.

I have written this article so that the next time a politician tells you that there will be ‘tough decisions’ to be made – which is political double-speak for cutting wages and wheeling in another slab of taxes which fire off yet another recession – you can refer to this article and confidently quote the immense amount of TAX which we all pay each year and how our tax money has created a vast fortune for the Royals…

THE ROYAL TRILLIONS…

Taxes on Customs & Excise are collected worldwide and funneled into Buckingham Palace – it is a matter of fact that revenues flow into the coffers from the USA and especially the ‘common wealth’ nations. BP shareholdings by the British royals and indeed the Dutch royals (who are closely related) are extensive – to say the least – and the crude oil extracted from the Americas by BP, which is then refined into consumer products, marine diesel and automobile fuels, accrues vast revenues for the royal family members in Europe…

First of all, exactly how much tax do British people pay every year? Taxation in the United Kingdom earned Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs £660 billion pounds last year – that is the sum which is commonly quoted by MPs and newspapers. Much of that tax comes from the People– not Corporations – who are often able to shutdown their parent company after three years, and start trading under a slightly different name, thus avoiding capital gains tax in perpetuity. This, of course, makes a mockery of the unwritten law that the wealthier of people in society contribute tax revenue in order to help the disabled & elderly. Workers, however, on the P.A.Y.E system cannot take legal advantage of tax havens, and have the indignation of a large portion of their salary being taxed/stolen at source, with not a jot of thanks from the Inland Revenue – nor, more importantly, is there any explanation as to why they have been taxed and what exactly the tax will be spent on.

(…) Of course, the Queen would be horrified if the British public realised that her own brother-in-law through marriage was a senior NAZI who funded and helped stage-manage the murder, torture, rape, killing and bombing of many hundreds of thousands of British troops and their allies. The queen’s husband has close former Nazi relatives – and this fact was raised by Mohamed Al Fayed during his evidence at the inquest into the killing of his son Dodi and Princess Diana in 1997. Mr Al Fayed believes Prince Philip personally orchestrated their deaths and, while being questioned, demanded that the coroner Mr Justice Scott Baker investigate the “Prince’s Nazi past”.

The sinister Nazi connections come from three of the Duke of Edinburgh’s four sisters – Sophie, Cecile and Margarita. All had married German princes, three of whom became leading Nazis – and that means that they were financing the killing machine which bred a ‘master race’ .

Prince Philip, whose family name is Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, attended the funeral in Nazi Germany of his elder sister Cecile as a 16-year-old schoolboy in 1937. He was pictured flanked by other relatives who were dressed in NAZI and Brownshirt uniforms. This, then, is the queen’s immediate inter-married family – headed by two princes in particular – Philipp of Hesse and his brother Christoph, who were great-grandsons of Queen Victoria – they had been central architects of a plan which was designed to bomb and crush the national governments of all Europe’s nations, and bring the colonies of Portugal, Spain, Belgium, Austria, Hungary, Britain, Ireland, Scandinavia and Greece under one centralised super-government which is exactly what we have today – it is called the EUROPEAN UNION – and it is secretly controlled by Buckingham Palace.

The queen’s immediate relatives plotted and conducted bombing raids and reduced the areas of all Europe’s cities where poor people lived into rubble and wasteland. It was the queen’s relatives who waged war on the People – the POOR PEOPLE.

No wonder then, as this information seeps out onto the world wide web, that she announced in her Christmas broadcast “Reconciliation is the peaceful end to conflict, and we were reminded of this in August when countries on both sides of the first world war came together to remember in peace…”

(…) The queen then said; “The ceramic poppies at the Tower of London drew millions, and the only possible reaction to seeing them and walking among them was silence. For every poppy a life; and a reminder of the grief of loved ones left behind”. In fact, those poppies displayed at the Tower of London were deliberately made to look like blood gushing from a window and pooling around the Tower which is where many royal members of the queen’s family had been murdered, or ordered the torture and execution of the innocent.

The queen’s speech is definitely an ‘olive branch’ being offered to authors like myself who have made films that expose the carnage and blood on royal hands. She said; “In 1914, many people thought the war would be over by Christmas, but sadly by then the trenches were dug and the future shape of the war in Europe was set. But, as we know, something remarkable did happen that Christmas, exactly a hundred years ago today. Without any instruction or command, the shooting stopped and German and British soldiers met in no man’s land. Photographs were taken and gifts exchanged. It was a Christmas truce. Truces are not a new idea. In the ancient world a truce was declared for the duration of the Olympic Games and wars and battles were put on hold…”. Well Ma’am, I am sorry to say this, but the only we can have any kind of truce is by way of equalising British society, handing back lands stolen from commonwealth aboriginal tribal people, and making sure that you STOP TAXING US.

The queen then attempted to ingratiate herself with the millions of brain dead TV addicts who sit through hours of meaningless televised SPORT – she said; “Sport has a wonderful way of bringing together people and nations, as we saw this year in Glasgow when over 70 countries took part in the Commonwealth Games. It is no accident that they are known as the Friendly Games. As well as promoting dialogue between nations, the Commonwealth Games pioneered the inclusion of para-sports within each day’s events. As with the Invictus Games that followed, the courage, determination and talent of the athletes captured our imagination as well as breaking down divisions…” The queen thinks that giving ‘circuses’ to the nations, just as the Roman Emperors did, that we would all forget about her family’s heinous war crimes. We don’t and will not.

Her Majesty then attempted to make some kind of apology for the thousands of families who were marred and bereaved through her civil warfare operation in Northern Ireland which lasted from the early 1960s through to the end of the 1990s; She said “The benefits of reconciliation were clear to see when I visited Belfast in June. While my tour of the set of Game Of Thrones may have gained most attention, my visit to the Crumlin Road Gaol will remain vividly in my mind”. It was, actually, this prison where agents, double agents and triple agents tortured, beat and were themselves incarcerated as the wicked civil warfare bloomed in Ireland – this war was about TAXATION and the need-for-greed which assimilates all royal family members – it is the wage packets of the Northern Irish people closest to her heart – not their feelings, or remorse for the people killed under orders of the ‘loyalists’ and the MI5 death squads in Ireland.

She even had the audacity to say; “What was once a prison during the Troubles is now a place of hope and fresh purpose; a reminder of what is possible when people reach out to one another, rather like the couple in the sculpture”. Of course, the real reason why there is now a truce in northern Ireland is that bombs were planted in the City of London which hit Buckingham Palace and all their stockbroker yes-men very hard indeed.

Perhaps the biggest insult was a total lack of recognition of the blatant VOTE RIGGING in the Scottish Referendum, which I predicted two months before it would take place, would result in an outcome in favour of Buckingham Palace – on this point, the queen said; “Of course, reconciliation takes different forms. In Scotland after the referendum many felt great disappointment, while others felt great relief; and bridging these differences will take time”.

(…) the Saxe-Coburg Gotha royal clan up-booted from Germany and took over control of the throne of Britain. The name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha came to the British Royal Family in 1840 with the marriage of Queen Victoria to Prince Albert, son of Ernst, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Members of this ‘British’ royal family had been involved in the BAVARIAN ILLUMINATI which had been stage-managed from behind the scenes by Adam Weishaupt, who on 18th November 1830 (aged 82) died in the queen’s family duchy of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.
Of course, the Bavarian Illuminati was a Judaic and ‘illuminised’ form of freemasonry – it’s rituals were based on jewish magic and Chaldean pageantry. Adam Weishaupt was a closet jewish lawyer specialising in the law of the Vatican, and he received regular wages from the queen’s ancestor, Duke Ernest II of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg (1745–1804). Weishaupt lived in a house on the Gotha Duchy writing a series of works on illuminism [ie; planning the New World Order], his books include gems such as A Complete History of the Persecutions of the Illuminati in Bavaria (1785), A Picture of Illuminism (1786), An Apology for the Illuminati (1786), and An Improved System of Illuminism (1787).

Considering the devilish antics of Bavarian secret societies and the inter-generational masonic mind-programming which has gone on amongst the royal family, one can see very well that they are far from being ‘good christians’…

Read the full post and see more of Christopher’s work here

See his full film archive at ChristopherEverard.com.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

9 Responses to “The Queen’s Christmas Message deciphered”

  1. Gary says:

    I agree but for this one point. She is not the Queen. Victoria came to the throne when she should not have, the hemophilia raised a flag over whether her parentage was as stated but there was a slim one in fifty-thousand chance that the hemophilia had developed spontaneously. Recently discovered in a car park King Richard’s remains have been DNA tested – seems like Elizabeth Windsor has no claim to the throne OR any of the personal estates of the monarch. This is not a secret and has even been reported on the BBC. Shouldn’t she step aside?

  2. sovereigntea says:

    I confess I couldnt be arsed to listen to Queenie’s speech however the author of this piece is in my opinion iffy.

    For starters the author incorrectly conflates the Crown with The Crown Corporation( City of Thieves) and ignores the fact that in the UK power lies in the hands of the executive in govt & even within the Privy Council. Queenie is in effect a ceremonial rubber stamper albeit with some influence.

    Christopher Everard also has a string of domains (25) registered in his name, many hosted in Arizona ( John McCain territory ) most of which seem tailored to extracting money from fools under the guise of peddling enlightened knowledge, in that respect flogging books, DVDs, subscriptions, he reminds me of zionist Stratfor stooge Alex Jones.

    Clearly the monarch and family as mere humans should under no circumstances be above the law and like anyone else be answerable for their actions and activities, in that context Prince Andrew springs immediately to mind for some reason.

    However I sense a suspicious pattern to this monarch bashing.

    If we separate the the institution of the monarchy from the mortals we find the monarchy is key to the constitution and Common Law in which our rights are enshrined for all time should we be man enough to defend them. If some nefarious entity wished to abrogate Common Law then one easy route might be to tarnish the monarchy via human compromise and propaganda as a political entity and impose a new constitution. We already see a parliament populated with treasonous bolshevik political whores denying the fact that we have a constitution and their signalled intention to impose a new constitution. It is no coincidence that jewish monelenders imposed the Dutchman gay King Billy upon the nation and formed The Crown Corporation to enslave the nation to usury and debt. It is also no coincidence that that embodiment of power has the most to gain from dumping Common Law and imposing outright financial dictatorship / EU roman or admiralty law.

    Plugging Christopher Everard into Google returns among other hits this: a Ripoff Report, on which one finds a rather convoluted story, but one thing both the principal posters agree on is that Chris Everard is a fraud and a conman. Among other sordid details, he is quoted as telling people that his site is “easy money from people who buy into this shit.” Everything about his websites suggests that this is the sole motivation there.

    When people talk about the Crown, they often believe that they’re referring to the British monarchy. But contrary to popular belief The Crown and the British monarchy are two different entities, the Crown is in fact a privately owned corporation, it operates outside the realms of the British legal system and controls the inner City Of London. The City Of London is often referred to as the square mile, It is currently recognised as the financial capital of the world and is the wealthiest square mile on the planet.

    With its own independent flag, laws & legislations, and its own privately owned police force, The Crown is an authority unto itself, it is a self-governing body, therefore, no government or governmental agency holds jurisdiction over The Crown or the inner city of london.

    To further understand this concept it’s essential to understand that the British empire has been broken up into two interlocking factions. One being the Commonwealth realm, which is directed by the Queen as head of state, for which she appoints a Prime Minister, and the other being the Crown territory which is directed by the Lord Mayor on behalf of the Crown Corporation of London.
    http://independencedaily.wordpress.com/2012/04/01/new-post/

  3. Gordon says:

    Michael Hastings descendants are the true royal family. King Michael died in June of 2012.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3368731.stm

  4. Anonymous says:

    There is no Great Britan either.!!

  5. Nollidge says:

    Actually,since Saxon times,the crown of England has always been “in the gift”,as the saying goes,of the people.In Saxon times this meant the Witan,the council of high churchmen & nobles.This body rejected the application from William of Normandy & chose Harold instead.William the Conqueror became king by right of conquest,but since then,all monarchs have ascended the throne with some form of approval by some body.In former times,this would be some grouping of the most powerful nobles.That body now,is Parliament.Thus the monarch’s actual ancestry is irrelevant.Once Parliament has given approval,they get the job.Of course it helps if there is a clear & provable genetic connection to the previous monarch,but this is not in fact essential.

  6. Nollidge says:

    Read what I wrote.The approval now has to come from Parliament.Thats England,Wales,Scotland & Northern Ireland’s Parliament.

  7. Veritopian says:

    Tap, & Sovereigntea, you are COMPLETELY wrong.

    The monarchy has *nothing* to do with common law which pre-existed any form of monarchy, and stands perfectly well without it. In fact the very concept of monarchy is OPPOSED to common law.

    Common law is common sense. Is it common sense that we must have a moon-arch? Of course not.

    Common law actually *requires* that all decisions are made by unanimous jury verdict, *not* by any monarch or their ‘government’. The ONLY valid form of government is by adhoc, non-professional (i.e. not paid) jury.

    Please correct your understanding, because this is a serious and deadly mistake on your part. Monarchy is a completely illegitimate concept that has no place in the true common law of the people. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.