Gordon Logan on who was behind Diana’s assassination, and other puzzles.

Former MI5 officer Annie Machon is on record as saying that Diana was killed because of her support for the Palestinians and her charismatic campaign against land mines.


I agree with her.

That doesn’t detract from John Morgan’s detailed revelations. It takes very little to instigate an assassination. A spoken sentence can be enough. Morgan’s herculean research is extremely valuable  but I am certain that the instigators were not in the royal family. For them, Diana’s death was a PR disaster. Rosa Monckton was obviously a spy. Never trust your best friend! We should remember that Mossad would be getting regular feedback on Diana from MI6. As I have said Diana thought that the Royals were planning to kill her because the plot was already false-flagged. The late Joe Vialls is very convincing on the Zionist connection. The few pages that he wrote on the case are essential reading.

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/uk-and-europe/2005/08/07/diana-princess-of-wales-murdered-by-pulse-ltl-weapon.php

The fact that Diana was told that Charles intended to have her killed in a car crash, suggests false flagging. We can be sure that the Israelis had agents in close proximity to such a dangerous and influential public figure. What was at play was much more than a family squabble. Diana had become a major international political player who had powerful enemies who were unconnected with the Royal Family.

I agree with Susie James. I think that the Israelis had very good motives for killing Diana. She wanted to become the ‘Queen of Hearts’ of the children of Gaza. Her marriage to Dodi al-Fayed would have marginalized her. As it is, the death of Diana was a PR disaster for the Royal Family. It is difficult to believe that they weren’t apprised of that fact in advance.

Cowper-Coles was ambassador to Saudi Arabia when I was there. He visited Jubail and my minder/assassin invited me to a reception. Sherard’s nose looks prosthetic, though I’m sure it’s genuine. It must be the only genuine attribute he has. I was impressed by his brass neck: the Embassy had already tried to have me killed not once but twice. I could have kicked up a fuss at the reception but I didn’t, since I have always made a point of being courteous with assassins. ‘Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer’ as they say. I once ran into a Bulgarian intelligence officer who had tried to have me killed. He looked this way and that, trying to find a doorway to hide. I invited him for a cup of coffee.

Killing people can be stressful, according to another killer that I know. Surviving, on the other hand, is gratifying. Having said that, I doubt that MI6 would have initiated such a high profile killing as that of Diana. The whole world (and the British public) blamed the royal family. I believe that the royal family were informed, and were made to carry the can. The Israelis love to compromise their ‘friends’. They had very serious motives for killing Diana. MI6 was involved as a subsidiary of Mossad.

We should remember that the United Kingdom does not have security services, although it pays for them. MI6, MI5 and GCHQ are merely departments of Mossad. Anybody foolish enough to work for them needs to know that. Those at the top know that, though the numpties further down don’t.

url

I ran into Peter Mandelson in the street during the summer. He was going to meet John Sawers, DG of MI6 the following day. Mandelson is a gofer for Jacob Rothschild (pictured) and also deeply involved in Russia policy. He likes to talk about the EU ‘punching its way’ in the world. He means of course punching Putin, who gave Jacob the bum’s rush in 2003, when Putin threw Rothschild front man Khodorkovsky into jail. A few weeks after I met Mandelson, the Ukes shot down MH17. No surprise there. And no prizes for guessing who’s filched Ukraine’s gold reserves.

Gordon Logan

TAP – Interesting stuff Gordon.  Even more so if Blair is Jacob’s illegitimate son, as some have suggested.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Responses to “Gordon Logan on who was behind Diana’s assassination, and other puzzles.”

  1. NPP says:

    Freedom of speech? Camoron = Silliband = Clugg = Obomba = NATO = …. different country, same authoritarian mind-set:
    Fortunately, The Net Is Mightier Than The Sword – James Corbett at TEDxGroningen:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i05m8w7rD_4
    It means stuff like this has light shone upon it:
    The Daily Telegraph: Turkish schoolboy arrested for ‘insulting’ President Erdogan:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/…/Turkish-schoolboy-arrested-for…:
    “…. the teenager was shown defending secularism and the principles of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the modern Turkish republic.
    He criticised the ruling AK Party government and Mr Erdogan personally over corruption allegations, as a crowd surrounding him chanted “everywhere is bribery, everywhere is corruption”.

  2. Anonymous says:

    The Soames brothers are behind a lot of the goings on with Serco, the inteligence services are coming into the light now. By the way Nicholas Soames called Diana unstable, hmm think he is guilty of that. Churchills grandsons have no loyalty to these shores.

  3. Gillian says:

    Does anyone else suspect that the Glasgow Bin Lorry crash in which 6 people lost their lives was some sort of False Flag operation or hoax?

    Personally, I don’t see what was to be gained from it, if indeed it was anything other than an unfortunate accident. Other false flags have had clearer motivations, e.g. 9/11 and 7/7 furthered the fake war on terror and the removal of more of our liberties and freedoms under the guise of ‘keeping us safe’. The Woolwich hoax obviously stirred up even more anti-muslim feelings than already existed.

    Unless I’m missing something and I don’t mean loads of photos which prove nothing one way or the other. Unless and until there is some real proof or evidence of a false flag or hoax, I shall continue to believe that the Glasgow incident was nothing more than a very unfortunate accident.
    Accidents do happen every day. Not every accident is a conspiracy and for some to imply otherwise only serves to discredit and call into question the real conspiracies.

    • sovereigntea says:

      Motive ?

      Shock doctrine – to distract from other newsworthy items that the PTB would rather you forget about ?

      Date the Winter Solstace – Occult significance ?

      A demonstration to those in the know that “we still have the power” ?

      There are three possible motives 🙂

  4. Jennifer says:

    If the ‘evil ones’ feed off negative energy and fear – wars, child murders, ‘terrorist’ false flags, and sadly apparent bizarre accidents such as train and helicopter crashes, then a horrific bin lorry killing just before Christmas just ramps up the pleasure for these twisted bastards.
    Maybe Scotland is in for a pasting after attempting to get free of them. Jim Murphy was lucky not to be hurt in the Clutha incident and in George St because apparently he was in both areas at the time.

    (Anon 12:54 Abel Danger is very interesting on SERCO and Soames – you should go there and maybe share your own research with them).

    • Gillian says:

      Jim Murphy – Now that is interesting and worthy of investigation.

    • onehundred says:

      Our emergncy services must be praised and trusted because they will be present at the next “big one”, as at 7/7. Drills must occur. New media will be used to “feed stories to the trusted press” and its efficacy monitored and assessed. Nobody dies but apparent deaths create the Diana effect [she didn’t die, that was all faked in a closed environment]. We will be conditioned to accept this next big one. Retirement age people are chosen or those just starting out in life.
      Lockerbie – just before Christmas? Thinking caps on please.
      “Former MI5 officer”? Once a fusilier….
      Perhaps some of these other murders which fill the headlines are not real and serve the same purpose, keeping everybody involved in work and the readers and viewers frightened/excited/interesed/still reading/tuning in? There must be plenty of fake funerals carried out.

  5. Jennifer says:

    Gillian, have you read Jim Murphy’s Wikipedia entry? It’s priceless!
    At the NUS he supported the abolition of the student grant and was accused by Ken Livingston of ‘intolerant and dictatorial behaviour’. He was chair of the Labour Friends of Israel and voted against a boycott of Israel. This doyen of the Labour Party claimed £1 million in ‘expenses’! And he tried to block the Scottish Independence referendum. How on earth did he manage to get where he is today? Hmmmmm?

  6. Nollidge says:

    TAP:No chance that Blair’s dad is Rothschild.BUT – his paternal grandparents were music hall artistes.Not many know that the stars of British music hall were mainly of East European Jewish origin.E.G.,Flanagan & Allen sound very British but were actually of E.European Jewish origin.And many,many others.BUT – there is a strong possibility that his eldest,Euan,is the result of a Fling between Cherie & Lord Irvine.Amazing resemblance between Euan & Irvine’s son of near the same age.His resemblance to Tony or Cheri?.NONE!.
    Note that although the ancestry of British Prime Ministers has frequently been investigated & reported by the press.when they come into office,but Blair’s?.Never.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.