US Will Use Its ‘ISIS Airstrikes’ in Syria as Aircover for Rebels, Hit Syrian Military Targets

SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 BY  LEAVE A COMMENT
Pat3_colorPatrick Henningsen
21st Century Wire

President Obama’s much celebrated ISIS(L) ‘strategy’ speech came on Tuesday night amid great fanfare and even greater debate. Sure, he outlined a strategy, but the President has been harboring another hidden agenda – one you won’t get a straight answer on.

Obama rode a wave of public outrage and fear into Tuesday’s address, mostly due to the extensive media coverage of the alleged murders of two American journalists, James Foley and Steven Sotloff – a drama played out on Youtube of all places. The beheadings were important in this process because they set the US military media campaign into hyper-drive. The timing in the run-up to the 9/11 anniversary seemed uncanny.

Obama’s public agenda is the one you can see on the table, one where the US officials promise to “degrade and destroy ISIS”. Sounds great. Who can disagree with that?

Then there’s the hidden agenda, somewhere under the table, and not really up for rational debate. That’s probably because it’s highly illegal and has something to do with what started the ISIS crisis to begin with.

This is how Obama plans to sneak back in and re-ignite with last year’s failed bombing campaign that never was in Syria. He explains, “I have made it clear that we will hunt down terrorists who threaten our country, wherever they are. That means I will not hesitate to take action against ISIL in Syria.”


SLIPPERY WHEN WET: Obama twisting and turning to hide the real agenda to ‘degrade and destroy’ Bashar al Assad in Syria.

Put aside for a minute that any US airstrikes conducted inside Syria without consultation of the Syrian government would be classed by international law and perhaps even by the UN as an act of war against Syria.

The central flaw in all of this is that Washington has no real policy on Syria other than hyperbole. Any policies it does have are centered around clandestine and illegal operations there. US officials will spout now and again how, “we do not recognize the Syria as a sovereign state”, even though the US has no legal basis on which to maintain such a position. They simply announce in 2011 that, “Assad must go”, ala regime change per usual. 


The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Responses to “US Will Use Its ‘ISIS Airstrikes’ in Syria as Aircover for Rebels, Hit Syrian Military Targets”

  1. Jennifer says:

    Before It’s News has an amusing article on how Obama is in front of a green screen projecting different backgrounds of flags, twin columns, drapes etc. He does appear to have Baphomet horns behind his head and those unnaturally big lugs whilst he is reading his script.

    http://beforeitsnews.com/r2/?url=http://2127news.net/2014/09/breaking-obama-in-his-bunker-the-scenery-of-his-speech-on-isis-is-different-in-pictures-and-videos-in-fact-he-has-horns-in-his-picture/

  2. Anonymous says:

    Good one!

  3. Anonymous says:

    I think this is where and when it’s all going to kick off. USAF and RAF (ignore what Cameron says about no UK involvement) fighter jets illegally attacking Syria on the phoney ISIL/ISIS/IS pretext AND without ANY kind of UN(sic) mandate – impossible with the certain Russia and China veto – will make a swift response from all and sundry all but inevitable.

    The now Inglorious Bastards of the USAF and RAF are about to reap the bloody whirlwind of a ‘Dresden payback time’ and not even get to come home in a closed coffin like the poor bloody infantry, as their falling warmongering ashes are spread anonymously over a sovereign nation’s land where they will soon be making so much US/UK manure for the Syrian farmers.

  4. Anonymous says:

    ISIS UNVEILED

    Look at the official time of the Great Queen’s death, 1515, perhaps I need glasses, but doesn’t it look like ISIS to you? How many clues do we want?

    It’s not beyond possibility that the Queen Mother actually died on the 29th March, because that would total 13/4 as well. That would also make it Friday – Freya’s Day, a shape-shifting goddess, leader of the Valkyries, whose sacred number was 13 (see above for 13’s). There are esoteric reasons why this is a more probable date, one of which is that the 29th is the 88th day of the year which means what happened and agrees with her first name, Elizabeth which also totals 88.

    Oh, and the night of 28th/29th was a Full Moon (Mar 28 18:25). The Moon projects its most potent energies towards Earth when it is Full. Either this Moon was used to help to revitalize the Old Serpent or it was employed to transfer the evil spirit, to possess its next host. Both would have required rituals, and more than likely child sacrifice. The victim(s) energy (numbers, name etc) would need to be congruent with hers, so mainly 4’s.

    88 also totals 16, the Tarot Tower (image right). 16 is another number that frequently pops up in the Queen Mother’s life. Glamis totals 16. Prince Albert first proposed to El-izabeth on December 2, 1921, a 16 day. (The second time he proposed was 26 December 1921 another 4 day) The prince proposed 3 times, which, as most people know is a magic formula. She married him on 26th April 1923, which adds to 16. Her husband died February 6, 1952, a 16 day. Elizabeth was 97 (9+7=16), when Diana died. Amanda Dowler disappeared at approximately 1600 hrs, 4 0’clock in the afternoon on the Spring Equinox, 7 days (an occult cycle of 6 days for preparation plus one) before the Queen Mother died.

    Diana had died on the final night of the Dark Moon. This sacrifice was purposely timed to prevent Diana’s absorption of the New Moon’s vigour on September 1st. Another coveted this energy, all of it; a waning moon goddess, the Old Hag. This ritual killing was to help sustain the evil entity for another 4 years.

    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/reptiles/reptiles12.htm

  5. Anonymous says:

    Has anyone wondered why they can’t seem to make up their minds if it’s ISIS, ISIL or IS? the truth is they want to use all 3 separately so it seems like there’s 3 different groups out for our blood.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.