Rigged referendum/election talk on UK Column Livestream

David Lim says Britain’s HAARP facility is in Wales, just outside Aberystwyth.  There’s one in Israel.  There are many others.  Ian Crane asks are these working in unison as a cohesive force, or are they trying to counter each other.  David believes they are being orchestrated in harmony with each other.

More modern versions of HAARP – SBX platforms, seen near earthquakes.

The ability to lock jet streams in place.  There are three major jet streams, 9 kilometres above ground level, carrying the moisture content.  42 countries with active weather modification programmes.  Hale suppression technology.  That means moving moisture around.

China admits to modifying weather.  Olympics.  There are winners and losers.  Hurricane Andrew killed far more than the officially admitted fifteen.  Homestead was totally devastated.  Unusual satellite signatures when Andrew turned ninety degrees and headed directly for New Orleans.  Land seized subsequent to the disaster and fenced off, land where poorer people lived.

LIM – hurricanes can be intensified or weakened, this was well understood by mid sixties.  Why are hurricanes not being weakened when they are about to hit populated land?

CRANE – Climate being manipulated for military use.


The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Responses to “Rigged referendum/election talk on UK Column Livestream”

  1. Anonymous says:

    This from the Aangirfan link:

    In Glasgow, “Police are investigating ten cases of electoral fraud.”

    Voters turned up at polling stations to find that people had already voted using their names.

    Police officers have remove(sic) the ballot papers concerned.

    The papers were from 10 different boxes across Glasgow, and not concentrated in one area.

    So my question is: “Whatever happened to the sacrosanct secret ballot?” How can those ballot papers be so easily identified? The Daily Mail link rabbits on about fingerprints on those ballot papers being compared with those persons identified but how come the impersonators’ fraudulent ballot papers were so easily isolated in the first place?

    Now I’m not stupid or inebriate for much of the time but I noticed serial numbers/letters on the back of the ballot paper when I once voted many years back in the UK. My thoughts then (and now) were that these numbers and letters identified whose ballot paper that was and the secrecy of the ballot box – like the fake democracy itself – were a total sham.

    I suggest that ‘those’ – aka Patriots – voting for non mainstream parties and which are considered ‘extremist’ (the LibLabContrick Friends of Israel are the real extremists of course) are easily and quickly identified and their names and addresses classified as dangerous.

    However, those voting for the LibLabCon and even Ukip/Greens are probably classified as clueless sheep and even more dangerous to the NWO as they are totally brainless and useless eater type baggage of scarce resources who must be culled first as they will not be expecting the nacht und nebel knock on the door. Hardened Patriots on the other hand will not be taken down so easily and serious casualties of NWO Enforcement Pigs can be expected. And so it shall be written.

  2. Anonymous says:

    homosexual history to be taught in scools
    you could not make it up

    https://dub123.mail.live.com/default.aspx#tid=cmhg3JUUFA5BGyWgAhWtlriA2&fid=flinbox

  3. Anonymous says:

    Financial Economic Collapse Foreign Troops Martia…: http://youtu.be/EyMMc0Gx2Ko

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.