It is the stupid actions of Hollande, Merkel, and Cameron which are endangering European security

The West Paves The Road To War With Lies

By Paul Craig Roberts

September 05, 2014 “ICH” – Official statements from the Russian government indicate that the president and foreign minister continue to rely on the good will of “our Western partners” to work out a reasonable diplomatic solution to the trouble in Ukraine caused by Washington. Not only is there no evidence of this good will in Western capitals, the hostile measures against Russia are increasing. Moreover, hostile measures are on the rise even though their main effect is to disadvantage Europe.

For example, the socialist president of France has followed Washington’s orders and refused to deliver a ship that it owes to Russia under contract. The news reports are so incompetent that they do not say whether Russia has paid for the ship or whether payment was awaiting completion. If Russia has not already paid, then the failure to deliver will harm whoever financed the construction of the ship. 

If Russia has paid, then the idiot French president has placed France in violation of a contract and under international law France is subject to heavy financial penalties.

It is not clear how this hurts Russia. It is Russia’s strategic nuclear force that the West has to fear, not a helicopter carrier. What Hollande has taught Russia is not to do business with France or any country in NATO.

Russia should promptly take the contract violation to court. Either France will be sanctioned with penalties that could exceed the value of the contract or the West will prove that in its hands international law is meaningless. If I were Russia, I would give up a helicopter ship in order to establish this point.

Marine Le Pen, the only leader France has, is not in power, although her support is growing. Le Pen says that Hollande’s obedience to Obama “will have a huge cost for France: the lost of millions of working hours and a fine of 5 to 10 billion euro.”
Holland sought to justify his kowtowing to Washington with a lie: “Russia’s recent actions in the east of Ukraine contravene the fundamental principles of European security.”

To the complete contrary. It is the stupid actions of Hollande, Merkel, and Cameron which are endangering European security by enabling Washington’s drive to war with Russia.

According to news reports for whatever they are worth, Washington and its EU puppet are preparing more sanctions against Russia. Considering the incompetence of Washington and the EU, it is unclear who will be bitten by the sanctions–Russia or Europe. The point is that Russia has done nothing to deserve any sanctions.
The sanctions are based on Washington’s lie that, in Obama’s words (September 3),
“Russian combat forces with Russian weapons in Russian tanks” are deployed in eastern Ukraine. As Professor Michel Chossudovsky reports on Global Research, observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) “have registered no troops, ammunition or weapons crossing the Russian-Ukrainian border over the past two weeks.”

These passages are from Professor Chossudovsky’s report on the OSCD findings:

“The OSCE Observer Mission is deployed at the Russian Checkpoints of Gukovo and Donetsk at the request of Russia’s government. The decision was taken in a consensus agreement by all 57 OSCE participating States, many of which are represented at the NATO Summit in Wales.
“The OSCE report contradicts the statements made by the Kiev regime and its US-NATO sponsors. It confirms that NATO accusations pertaining to the influx of Russian tanks are an outright fabrication.

“NATO backed up Obama’s statements with fake satellite images (28 August 2014) that allegedly ‘show Russian combat forces engaged in military operations inside the sovereign territory of Ukraine’.  These statements are refuted by a detailed report of the OSCE monitoring mission stationed at the Russia-Ukraine border. The NATO reports including its satellite photos were based on fake evidence.

“It is worth noting that the OSCE carefully categorizes movements across the border, which largely consist of refugees.”

Just as Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya were attacked on the basis of transparent lies and Syria and Iran were set up for attack on the basis of transparent lies, the sanctions against Russia rest solely on transparent lies. According to the UK Telegraph, the new sanctions will ban all Russian state-owned oil and defense companies from raising funds in European capital markets. In other words, any Western oil enterprises operating in Russia would be exempted.
One Russia response to sanctions should be to confiscate any Western firms operating in Russia as compensation for damages inflicted by the sanctions.

Another response is to obtain financing from China.

Another response is to self-finance energy and defense needs. If the US can print money in order to keep 4 or 5 mega-banks afloat, Russia can print money to finance its needs.

The lesson that Washington is teaching the larger part of the world is that a country has to be insane to do business with the West. The West views business as a hegemonic tool that is used to punish, exploit, and loot. It is astonishing that after so many lessons, countries still seek IMF loans. It is impossible not to know by now that an IMF loan has two purposes: the looting of the country by the West and the subordination of the country to Western hegemonic policy. 

Yet idiot governments still apply for IMF loans.

All of the escalation of the Ukrainian situation is caused by the US, EU, and Kiev. Apparently, Washington interprets Russia’s low-key response as evidence that the Russian government is intimidated. But when Putin holds all the cards and can wreck Europe by turning off the flow of natural gas and can reincorporate the entire Ukraine back into Russia in two weeks or less, how can Washington impose its will?

Is Russia so desperate to be part of the West that it will succumb to being another of Washington’s puppet states?

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article39585.htm

From Harriet

NATO is a Zionist Communist Jewish creation which inflicts unimaginable harm to the world! NATO is going all out for WW 111 and if that happens the target would be Russia, China and Iran.

War is not their only means to destroy countries and people they dislike!

Iceland few days ago had a volcanic eruption. Icelanders are is still unsafe because of this and the earthquakes and they are caused by manmade weather manipulation which is a known cause for disaster making – another tool in the dangerous Zionist hand to be used to create more chaos and harm to innocent people who through their opposition to Zionist tyranny have become a serious threat for the New World Order of Jewish world domination and the establishment of Greater Israel as per the Protocols of Zion.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Responses to “It is the stupid actions of Hollande, Merkel, and Cameron which are endangering European security”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Hollande, Cameron & Merky = three stooges Curly Larry and Mo. Nuff said.

  2. Anonymous says:

    The Corporation of the City of London will decide whether Britain will engage in a conflict/war like always. Sovereigntea mentioned on another item about the CITY REMEMBRANCER in Parliament. He is the ONLY unelected person to sit in the Commons. He is their to represent the Corporation of the City of London i.e. the mainly Jewish/Zionist private banks.

    The Guardian wrote. “Several governments have tried to democratise the City of London but all, threatened by its financial might, have failed. As Clement Attlee lamented, “over and over again we have seen that there is in this country another power than that which has its seat at Westminster.” The City has exploited this remarkable position to establish itself as a kind of offshore state, a secrecy jurisdiction which controls the network of tax havens housed in the UK’s crown dependencies and overseas territories. This autonomous state within our borders is in a position to launder the ill-gotten cash of oligarchs, kleptocrats, gangsters and drug barons.

    L.G. Pine (1957)the Editor of Burke’s Peerage, “Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also.” (Tales of the British Aristocracy1957, p.219.)

  3. Anonymous says:

    Let’s have an article about the Board of Deputies of British Jews. From Wiki:

    The Board of Deputies of British Jews (historically London Board of Deputies and London Committee of Deputies of British Jews) is the main representative body of British Jews. Established in London in 1760, when seven Deputies were appointed by the elders of the Sephardi congregation of Spanish and Portuguese Jews to form a standing committee and pay homage to George III on his accession to the throne;[1] shortly thereafter the Ashkenazi Jewish congregation from Central and Eastern Europe similarly appointed their own “Secret Committee for Public Affairs” to deal with any urgent political matters that might arise,[2] and safeguard the interests of British Jews as a religious community, both in the British Isles, but in the colonies.[3] They soon began to meet together as occasions arose, and then on a more frequent basis; by the 1810s they appear to have united as one body.

    The Board of Deputies offices are situated in the family home of Isaac D’Israeli, the father of the British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli.

    The Board is the British affiliate of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), the world-wide umbrella organisation of Jewish communities. (Look out for the pedearast Janner and his father on the list.)

    The most historically notable and longest-serving past president was the Victorian philanthropist Sir Moses Montefiore, who in the nineteenth century travelled widely to assist Jewish communities in foreign countries, faced by persecution at the time. A complete list of presidents, and interim positions during these travels, is given below. More recently Greville Janner MP (now Lord Janner) was a President.

    Benjamin Mendes Da Costa (1760)
    Joseph Salvador (1766)
    Joseph Salvador (1778)
    Moses Isaac Levy (1789)
    Naphtaly Bazevy (1801)
    No Record (1802–1812)
    Raphael Brandon (1812)
    Moses Lindo (1817–1829)
    Moses Mocatta (1829–1835)
    Sir Moses Montefiore (1835–1838)
    David Salmons (1838 Oct. – Nov.)
    I.Q. Henriques (1838–1840)
    Moses Montefiore (1840 (May -Jul.)
    Hananel De Castro (1840–1841)
    Moses Montefiore (1841–1846)
    David Salomons (1846 (Mar – Aug.)
    Moses Montefiore (1846–1855)
    Isaac Foligno (1855 (Apr. – Dec.)
    Moses Montefiore (1855–1857)
    Isaac Foligno (1855 (Feb. – Sep)
    Moses Montefiore (1857–1862)
    Joseph Meyer Montefiore (1862–1868)
    Moses Montefiore (1868 (Jun. – Nov.)
    Joseph Meyer Montefiore (1868–1871)
    Moses Montefiore (1871–1874)
    Joseph Meyer Montefiore (1874–1880)
    Arthur Cohen (1880–1895)
    Joseph Sebag Montefiore (1895–1903)
    David Lindo Alexander (1903–1917)
    Stuart Samuel (1917–1922)
    Henry Henriques (1922–1925)
    Lord Rothschild (1925–1926)
    Osmond d’Avigdor-Goldsmid (1926–1933)
    Neville Laski (1933–1939)
    Selig Brodetsky (1940–1949)
    A. Cohen (1949–1955)
    Lord Barnett Janner (1955–1964)
    Soloman Teff (1964–1967)
    Michael Fidler (1967–1973)
    Lord Fisher (1973–1979)
    Greville Janner, QC (1979–1985)
    Lionel Kopelowitz (1985–1991)
    Israel Finestein (1991–1994)
    Eldred Tabachnik, QC[5] (1994–2000)
    Josephine Wagerman (2000–2003), OBE, formerly headmistress of the JFS in the years 1985–1993.[6]
    Henry Grunwald OBE QC (2003–2009)
    Vivian Wineman (2009 – )

    Criticisms and controversies

    In 2003, the Board, on its web site, reproduced an extract from a US State Department report that suggested that the aid organisation Palestinian Relief and Development Fund (Interpal) was helping to fund terrorist organisations. Interpal threatened to sue for libel, whereupon the Board retracted and apologised for its comments
    On 5 February 2007, a group of prominent British Jews, such as Nobel laureate Harold Pinter and lawyer Sir Geoffrey Bindman, launched an organisation called Independent Jewish Voices to counterbalance what they perceive as uncritical support of Israel by major Jewish institutions in the UK, criticising particularly the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

  4. RKae says:

    “World War One Hundred and Eleven”?

    I know that a lot of history has been manipulated and edited, but that many world wars?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.