The Dickens Dossiers from 1983

1983-84: The 3 Dickens Dossiers and the 2 Scotland Yard PIE Files

DICKENS DOSSIER #1, 20th August 1983 (approx)
“Geoffrey Dickens revealed that eight public figures were on his list of shame – and that one of them had been a personal friend. But Mr Dickens said he still planned to name the eight in the Commons unless the Home Secretary took action.
He said: “I’ve got eight names of big people, really important names, public figures. And I am going to expose them in Parliament. I have not enjoyed this crusade. It’s been horrible many times. One of those people among those eight has been a friend of mine.”
Mr Dickens’s own list of eight public figures involved in the sex scandal was handed to the Director earlier this week…together with the warning that he would name them in Parliament if necessary.
Two years ago, Mr Dickens defied leading figures in the Tory party by publicly exposing former diplomat and NATO adviser Sir Peter Hayman.
Hayman had not been named in a court case involving members of the Paedophile Information Exchange, but Mr Dickens decided it would be wrong to let him get away with it. It was case of ‘speak out or be damned’ and he spoke out.
Hayman resigned. Dickens, who initially came under attack from many of his colleagues in the Commons, received 8,000 letters from people who had tales to tell of others like Hayman.
Mr Dickens, 52, told as he relaxed wth a cup of tea how his wife, Norma, helped him sort out the letters.
He said: “We ruled out anyone who only had one or two accusations against him. The others we sifted until we were down to a couple of dozen on whom there appeared to be considerable evidence that they were unhealthy perverts. The security aspect concerned me greatly because of the names of several of the people who turned up in the files. I realised we were involved in a crusade – a crusade that has to be carried through to a proper conclusion”.
He used House of Commons researchers and enlisted local reporters, librarians and friends to help go through records, check files, even empty dustbins of some of the suspects. In the end there were just those eight men on the list of shame. Discussions with Scotland Yard followed.
“I suspect that their list is much bigger and I hope that this time there will be not attempt to head off charges as happened in the Sir Peter Hayman case.”
He urged: “The Home Secretary must act. The will of the country demands that action should be taken and penalties made more severe so that perverts who involve children in their practices should be jailed.””
DICKENS DOSSIER #2,  23rd November 1983
“Mr Leon Brittan, the Home Secretary, was asked yesterday to investigate an MP’s file of cases involving paedophilia in Buckingham Palace and the diplomatic and civil services.”
“A homosexual link between Buckingham Palace and the sex with children group PIE was claimed yesterday in a massive dossier of evidence by Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens.”
DICKENS DOSSIER #3, 18th January 1984
Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens yesterday handed the Home Secretary a “sensational” 50-page dossier on the activities of the Paedophile Information Exchange. The file includes allegations of child abuse and sex assaults at a children’s home. Mr Dickens said last night that he had also named a top television executive.
SCOTLAND YARD FILE #1, 23rd August 1983 (approx, delivered to Leon Brittan the same week as Dickens Dossier #1 was delivered to DPP)
Two separate reports on the Paedophile Information Exchange…have been prepared for ministers after Scotland Yard’s third investigation into the organisation. The first report, prepared by the Yard and sent to Mr Leon Brittan, will be used by the Home Secretary when he returns from holiday next week and has to decide whether the organisation needs to be banned.
SCOTLAND YARD FILE #2,  25th August 1983 (delivered to DPP same week as Dickens Dossier #1)
The Director of Public Prosecutions, Sir Thomas Hetherington, – today takes delivery of a file on paedophilia – the distasteful fruit of two years’ work by Scotland Yard’s Obscene Publications Squad. The squad’s thick file, containing the names of the famous, the wealthy, and hundreds of anonymous citizens, was sent from the Yard yesterday.
“Because it has technically left our hands, we can say nothing about the file’s contents as the matter is effectively sub judice”, a Scotland Yard spokesman said last night. “It is now up to the Director to decide what action should be taken. It is purely coincidental that the report has been concluded at the time investigations are under way.”

http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2014/07/04/1983-84-the-3-dickens-dossiers-and-the-2-scotland-yard-pie-files/

Shirlz writes –

There seems to be some confusion over these ‘inquiries’ (three of them now)…
(rightfully so, TBTB are looking to confuse, complicate and obviously ‘whitewash’ this one). 

I noticed this yesterday, David Cameron, when talking about ‘inquiry’, was referring to ‘Inquiry into Missing Dossiers… NOT ‘all encompassing inquiry into institutionalised child abuse’

-Peter Wanless will lead a ‘review’, into the missing dossier and how the Home Office handled the allegations (114 missing dossiers?)

-A major inquiry is to be launched into child sex abuse carried out at every level of society, Home Secretary Theresa May announced today.


A panel of experts will examine evidence that successive governments, charities, political parties, the NHS, the BBC and the Church failed to protect children from paedophiles.
(Daily Mail)

It is NOT a full-scale public inquiry, but an ‘inquiry panel’ (based on Hillsborough inquiry).


The panel Chairman has NOT been declared.
The panel members have NOT been decided, but are expected to be experts from various agencies and child protection services (anyone Senior form Law Enforcement agencies? NCA? SOCA?)


If the panel members – who are yet to be appointed – demands it, ministers could convert it to a public inquiry at a later date.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2683020/Theresa-May-bows-pressure-order-wide-ranging-inquiry-allegations-child-abuse-Westminster.html#ixzz36o8mScrD 

‘the exercise would look not only at state institutions, but would bring the church into its scope and would also examine the role of political parties including the conduct of whips’ offices at Westminster.’

The inquiry would also be entitled to look into papers kept by the security services, and May said she would see if former officials could be freed from obligations under the Official Secrets Act.’
:/
It could include reports from Special Branch, intelligence services and submissions sent to Prime Ministers.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Responses to “The Dickens Dossiers from 1983”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Dumbing Down and Mind Control

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nlp9XVZDgeg

    This 4:45 video uses clips from the Network film at the beginning and end but has this amusing middle piece lasting 1:38 delivered drone/dead-pan fashion to illustrate what’s going on in the state school system and ‘entertainment’ world at large – and why I very much doubt the British sheeple will finally and justifiably rise up and descend on the British Parliament and put the expression ‘rope and lampposts’ into full and immediate effect for the nonces, deviants and perverts that infest the Westminster Village and Palaces.

    Text from 1:12 – 2:50

    You might want to ask yourself why the entire culture is utterly saturated with mass media entertainment from all sides, while the educational system in America continues its stupefying downward slide since the US government decided to take over and subsidise the public school system…..

    What your government pays for, it gets! When we understand that, then we look at government financed institutions of education and see the kind of students and the kind of education that is being turned out by these government financed schools, logic will tell you that if what is being turned out in those schools was not in accord with what the state and the federal government wanted, then it would change it!

    The bottom line is that the government is getting what they have ordered! They do not want your children to be educated; they do not want you to think too much. That is why our country and our world has become so proliferated with entertainments, mass media, television shows, amusement parks, drugs, alcohol and every kind of entertainment that keep the human mind entertained so that you don’t get in the way of important people by doing too much thinking.

    You had better wake up and understand that there are people who are guiding your life and you don’t even know it!

    Former Child Actor is Let Down After Opening Up to Media: ‘I named names, but they’ve buried my story’
    OCTOBER 22, 2012
    http://21stcenturywire.com/2012/10/22/ben-they-wanted-names-but-not-the-one-i-gave-them/

    ‘Buried’ is what I expect will be attempted with all these current inquiries where really ‘high up’ paedophiles are concerned. A nearly dead or suicided miscreant may get sacrificed but it will clearly be a whitewash imho.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Yes i agree it will be a white wash..NSPCC. are involved that alone should make people ask questions they cover for Governments ..Sad thing is the SHEEPLE will believe all the bollocks ..Children to day are being abused and they do FFF All ..Nonce controled Governments ..and Police ..both knew about the Leon Brittan document as the police had a copy so why did they do nothing ?..Leon Brittan you know more than the media is telling and so do the police Guilty by ..Joint enterprise ..don’t cha know !!!

  3. Somewhere in Europe says:

    The DPP at the time also needs hauling over the coals as to why he/she also did nothing with the dossiers. Name em and shame em all!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.