Kent University – World Experts to Debate ‘Was 9/11 an Inside Job?’

Hello Tap,
Can you post this on your site please?
Cheers.
Matt Campbell (whose brother died during 911)
——————————————————————————————————-
Event: A formal debate featuring world experts will be conducted at Kent University asking the question ‘Was 9/11 an inside job?’

Date: Tuesday April 1st, 2014
Time: 7.00 – 9.00pm
Venue: Grimond Lecture Theatre 1, Kent University, Canterbury

Event Overview
The views of the ‘9/11 truth movement’, which has long argued that Al Qaeda must have had some kind of assistance in staging the attacks of 9/11, have been widely criticised in many quarters for being based on supposedly flimsy and outrageous speculation, and for being disrespectful to the families of the victims.

Edward Shambrook, a playwright at Kent University is currently producing a play about the allegedly misdirected and mistaken ‘9/11 truth movement’. In advance of launching his play, he will lead one side of a formal debate at Kent University, arguing in support of the official story about 9/11 that 19 Saudi and Afghan terrorists hijacked 4 airliners and successfully evaded the US air defence system, resulting in two of the airliners crashing into the Twin Towers. The ensuing fires from the jet fuel causing both towers to collapse, and then office fires in the nearby World Trade Centre Building 7 causing it to also collapse later in the day.

On the other side of the debate, two world experts from the ‘9/11 truth movement’ will be arguing that this official version of events is not the complete and accurate story, and that other influences must have been involved. Putting the evidence and arguments forward for this position will be Professor Niels Harrit, formerly Professor of Chemistry at Copenhagen University, and one of the world’s foremost scientists regarding the scientific evidence that supposedly contradicts the official story of 9/11. Professor Harrit will present evidence focussing in particular on the mysterious and total collapse of World Trade Centre Building 7, a 47 storey High Rise Tower not struck by a plane, but which collapsed at 5.20pm on 9/11 in perfect symmetry and in less than 7 seconds. Professor Harrit will present his evidence for the alleged presence and use of high tech explosives. Joining Professor Harrit will be Ian Henshall, the UK’s leading author on the evidence allegedly contradicting the official story of 9/11, in particular, evidence that intelligence agencies knew that an attack was imminent and that they should have been able to prevent it.

Adding to the intrigue of this subject is the recent revelation in December 2013, that two members of US Congress, who have been granted special permission by Congress to view 28 redacted pages of the 9/11 Commission Report, have been shocked by what they have read in those previously concealed pages, and are currently demanding that President Obama release these 28 pages for all of Congress to see. The debate is likely to be a lively and controversial affair, and a sizeable and very divided audience is expected to attend.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

9 Responses to “Kent University – World Experts to Debate ‘Was 9/11 an Inside Job?’”

  1. Anonymous says:

    The world is controlled by a master race from Sirius. Why do you think the Pyramids where built with this in mind? The dog Star, the Reptilian complex controls this planet with the Hegelian dialectic, and above all for this to work humans must be totally convinced that they are free. Earth has been a Reptilian slave colony from the start, wake up.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Anon, assuming you are a paid disinfo troll, you have a lot to learn. And you are certainly not doing your homework reading.

    Here’s a tip: 911 is one area of “conspiracy” theory that focuses entirely on scientific fact and debate.

    911 (so called) Truthers should really be called 911 Facters. Richard Gage is a Buddhist, I believe, but that’s about as far out as it gets (and this wonderful man needs no defence in his sticking to the scientific facts and keeping religion out of it).

    PS: it’s “were”, not “where”.

    0 out of 10 in your trolling test.

  3. Nollidge says:

    Dear Anon 5.35;
    Just out of curiosity,are you paid in dollars or shekels?.Regular wage or piece-work?.Per word or per comment?.

  4. paul maleski says:

    Ask BBC boss jewboy Danny Cohen the whereabouts of BBC 9/11 New York journalist Clare Voyant aka Jane Standley? Who predicted the collapse of steel framed WTC7 before it even happened. This is a remarkable feat as the structure never had a direct hit from a plane in the first place. Just how did the BBC know? The Dancing Israelis will definitely have a story to tell. Israeli infiltraitors attacked the USA on 9/11! Don’t muddy the waters.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Paul Maleski thankyou
    thats all

  6. Thanks for the link Anon 11:14am. Good to see some teachers, students and universities are trying to educate people. This is a shocking BS propaganda being taught in schools in the UK http://www.911educationprogramme.co.uk/ Another letter methinks to be penned to Gove and the University of London …

  7. Will Freemen says:

    For the official 9/11 Commission and NIST’s explanations for the cause of the collapse of the buildings to be valid, on at least one of the floors of all three buildings, ALL the load-baring steel pillars had to be removed in an instant. Fire cannot do that, only explosions can.

    All 3 buildings collapsed symmetrically at close to free-fall rate just like fo controlled demolitions. NIST’s hypothesis to explain this is that the top rigid structure above floors with collision and or fire damages (WTC 7 no colliding jet), collapsed in an instant on top of the intact rigid structure below. And that that impact caused the top floor to pancake on top of the floor below and so on until all floors were smashed. To make this remotely possible, as I said, all the load bearing steel columns on a floor had to collapse in an instant. Which fires just cannot do. Even if columns melted it will not be fast enough to cause sudden symmetrical collapse.

    But even if the steel columns on a floor could magically dissapear, then Newtons Law of Action and Reaction tells us that with each impact, a floor on both the bottom section and the top section should disintegrate. For WTC 1, the top rigid structure was 12 floors, with 6 damage floors below it and above the rigid intact 92 floors below them. So maximum 18 of the 92 floors could be smashed, the rest should have remained standing….

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.