Teachers ‘face sack’ for refusing to endorse gay marriage


Hi Tap
There is no question in my mind that homosexuality is being actively promoted everywhere.
From the Telegraph 2012
Julie

Teachers who refuse to endorse gay marriage in the classroom could face the sack under controversial Government reforms, a legal expert has warned.

Teachers could be sacked for refusing to follow books on gay marriage, according to legal advice commissioned by the Coalition for Marriage.

Teachers could be sacked for refusing to follow books on gay marriage, according to legal advice commissioned by the Coalition for Marriage. Photo: ALAMY
Graeme Paton
By Graeme Paton, Education Editor
6:00AM BST 10 Sep 2012
Schools will be within their statutory rights to dismiss staff that wilfully fail to use stories or textbooks promoting same-sex weddings, it is claimed.
Aidan O’Neill, a senior QC and expert on religious freedom and human rights, also warned that parents who object to gay marriage being taught to their children will have no right to withdraw their child from lessons.
In a report, he said that any decision to redefine marriage would have far-reaching consequences for schools, hospitals, foster carers and public buildings.
The most serious impact is likely to be felt in the church where vicars and priests conducting religious marriage ceremonies could be taken to court for refusing to carry out a gay wedding, he said.
The conclusions – in legal advice commissioned by the Coalition for Marriage – comes amid continuing fall-out over Government plans to tear up the centuries-old law on marriage. 
The appalling sexual crimes committed against children in care were committed by powerful homosexuals – pederasts.  I don’t hear about many girls coming forward as victims.
People should research Stonewall, a powerful lobbying homosexual charity.  They are funded by banks, one of which is Coutts, now owned by RBS (majority owned by tax-payers), and  another is Barclays.  The chief of the Metropolitan Police Bernard Hogan-Howell enjoyed himself at the Stonewall dinner.
Bernard Hogan-Howe 11/04/2013.Stonewall Equality Dinner 2013  The Dorchester,  Park Lane, Mayfair  London, .Stonewall Chief  Executive Ben Summerskill, Christopher Biggins,  Brian Paddick,  Gok Wan & Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe,.
Lots more photos on the below link.
And finally, I came across this site “Overlord of Chaos”
The practice of homosexuality is not merely a political concern but a profoundly spiritual concern. Homosexuality is a spiritually deadly condition that threatens, for different reasons, both its zealots and its enemies. It is this capacity to do great evil to a morally ordered society that homosexuality has been used as an instrument of destruction by the dark spiritual forces plotting to destroy Natural Moral Order on Earth. Very wicked men who are the human agents of Evil have actively supported the rise of the Homosexual Lobby by channelling funding from the great “tax exempt foundations” to support the political and ideological assault on Natural Moral Order on Earth. The Homosexual Lobby has been cultivated and empowered by powerful forces that want to use it as an agent of change and the prominent activists as “change agents.” This is the function of another great lie called Humanism, which is the Rationalist  attack on the faith of religion and of the concept of God and the Incarnation of Christ
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

17 Responses to “Teachers ‘face sack’ for refusing to endorse gay marriage”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Homosexual satanists, paedophiles and masons. All in it together as Mr Levitt would say.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Live and let live is my motto, as long as you are both happy!
    But is this not the Frankfurt Technique at work here!

    Kind regards,

    James.

  3. Anonymous says:

    “Live and let live is my motto, as long as you are both happy!”

    And what of the paedophile who has sexual relations with infants? What if the infant enjoys being fondled? Would this therefore not imply that in ‘your terms’ both are happy?

    We have morals within our societies in order to stop decadence. You either believe in a moral existence or a decadent one, not both. I will always believe in the former to guide my life.

    And yes, it is very much the work of the Frankfurt school, before them it came with Freud. Man should not lay with another man and the same with women. I love my friends but I don’t have sexual relations with them. It is a perversion. Always has been and always will be and will never be acceptable behaviour.

    regards

    Harbinger

  4. Anonymous says:

    Evander Holyfields comments on CBB provoked a more passioned than necessary rebuttal from Mathew Wright on his normally fairly balanced morning show.
    I know homosexuality is over represented in the arts and TV, but for such a large swathe of airtime to be tied up for such a long time, seems a little bit too much.
    Slowly slowly the bar is sinking, and anyone who complains becomes a ‘Gaybasher’;

  5. Anonymous says:

    You have to be aware of just what it represents
    The jews brought this into the roman empire and even the greek, it was made fashionable for men to have a young bumboy.
    In fact Hitler banned any kind of filth from Germany.
    Lord Rothschild said to the apostles in the 1930s, remember thes ewere his homosexual debauchees, that Homosexuality would be the wooden horse through which Britian would be destroyed and taken into communism.
    Homosexual relationships last on average 7 minutes ina public toilet, how can that be equated to marraige ?
    what they want is to break down marriage and the family unit.
    feminise men and masculinise women until they meet in the middle

  6. julie says:

    Is that a Masonic handshake?
    Photo number 18 on the link Bernard Hogan-Howell shaking the hand of a young reality show pleb

  7. Anonymous says:

    It’s looking very much as if the sexual practices of ancient Rome are gradually being revived (great news for gays). Sex between males was very much a way to advertise one’s status and power. It was not frowned upon, on the contrary it was their way of life and a way to climb the social status ladder

    Homosexuality in ancient Rome was a large part of society and of sexuality in general. Sex in the ancient world was considered a casual day-to-day practice with no emotional attachment, which is very different from the views of sex in modern day society. Despite its commonality, sex was something that was kept under wraps in ancient Rome and seldom spoken of. The ancient Romans also had a very different understanding of homosexuality than we do in modern society. There was no real concept of homosexuality or of heterosexuality.

    Male with male relations were the most common and prevalent type of homosexuality in ancient Rome. Older men taking a young male lover was very common. For example the emperor Hadrian took a young lover named Antinous despite being married. Most scholars assume they were lovers because when Antinous died tragically Hadrian had a large of amount of deified statues made of him and placed all over the Empire. The emperor Nero also had a male lover who he eventually married. The dynamic between two male lovers was simple. First of all, one was usually of upper class and the other was either a slave or of lower class. The older and richer man was never the receiving party with regards to penetration. This was an unspoken rule among these couples and was in place because if a man was on the receiving end of a sexual relationship he was no longer considered masculine by society’s standards. If a man was the dominant one in a male on male sexual relationship it was just another way for him to assert his place of power in society. A place that was common for random male on male intercourse was the Roman bathhouse. It has been discovered that as a sign that a man was looking for sexual activity a man would scratch his head with one finger to signal that he was sexually available.

    http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Roman_Culture/Homosexuality

    There are several books available on the internet on Ancient Rome and their sexual nature which give an interesting insight as to the homosexual nature of the elites we are encountering today.

    I am gradually seeing more and more evidence of Old Roman attitudes being introduced into modern western society. Perhaps this is preperation for Rome to be the overall ruler again.

  8. Anonymous says:

    @anon above (9:55)

    And the Romans crucified people (amongst other horrific tortures and ways of murder) not forgetting putting people in arenas to kill one another and be eaten by wild animals.

    I hardly think the Romans can be seen for their morals? They had none. Absolute tyranny. The elites killed whomever they chose.
    I know you’re not advocating a return to Roman ways….or are you?

    regards Harbinger

  9. Anonymous says:

    Hi Tap, Freemasons have a lot to do with the topsy turvey world we are in at the moment.
    The World where black is white and right is wrong.
    We do need to get rid of Freemasonary and get back to God’s law.
    The Elite put these Freemasons in positions of power to grind us down by their perversions.
    Roll on the next revolution.
    Wat Tyler must be looking down and thinking what fools we are.

  10. Anonymous says:

    God’s instruction to Moses for Israel.
    (Lev 20:13 [NET])
    If a man has sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman, the two of them have committed an abomination. They must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves.
    Gordon.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Upper degress in masonry advocate
    sex with boys.
    The PTB would have it pedophilia in different to homosexuality, but we cleard the house of a well known homosexual campaigner after his death and from top to bottom it was full of pics of young boys.
    And this is the ultimate goal to leagalise sex with kids,

  12. Anonymous says:

    The BBC has long had a process of employing homosexuals before heteros, the BBC has according to police hampered the investigations into Jimmy Saville etc at every turn
    If the BBC really thought homosexuality was OK, it would have spoken openly about up to 30 sex offenders in its employ past and present

  13. Tapestry says:

    The motivation for secret societies seeking total power over humanity could well have been sexual from the very beginning

  14. Anonymous says:

    Opration hedgerow, was the secret london police initative, into homosexuals preying on young boys in schools, care homes and even
    cub scouts and football clubs.
    150 boys gave statements but up to 400 were disallowed.
    The verdict was that there is nota dividing line between homosexuals and pedophiles as the government would have you beliederingnehisve

  15. Anonymous says:

    Harbinger 10.28.. Absolutely not, No! I was merely pointing out the similarities the elites today in government , media, TV etc (those of power and status)are pushing there debauched agenda for gay sex and child sex to be an acceptable way of life as it was in in Roman times.
    Perhaps they all fancy themselves as gladiators! after all they are continually pushing fitness and excercise just as Romans of old worshiped the human body form.
    I personally find their depraved lifestyle sickening and lacking in normal human qualities.

  16. salty says:

    Isra-Hell Votes Down Marriage Equality For LGBT.

    American Jews Promote LGBT Rights In Non-Jewish Nations.

    Posted on March 5, 2016.

    https://ronabbass.wordpress.com/2016/03/05/isra-hell-votes-down-marriage-equality-for-lgbt-american-jews-promote-lgbt-rights-in-non-jewish-nations/

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.