11% for MPs. 1% for the proles they ‘represent’.

Hi Tap,

There’s something very fundamentally wrong in a society were the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. We’ve all seen it, the insatiable greed of the few at the expense of the many but I’d like here to talk of our MPs whose main roll is to represent their constituents. That’s you and I, the average Joe Bloggs, who are the true representatives of our country.

I find it insulting to our workers who keep the country on its feet to be told by our government that they should expect a 1% increase in their salaries, while at the same time face an average increase of 8%  in their utility bills, and our MPs are awarded 11% in their salaries while having their utilities paid for by the state.

 The disposable income of the many is reduced while the disposable income of the few is increased which is of no comfort to those 2 million people living in the UK who already fall below the breadline.

MPs are said to be embarrassed at their pay award – if you can believe that –  they have no right to be embarrassed but every right to be ashamed taking this pay hike to themselves while their constituents suffer the consequence of their actions having government austerity measures imposed on them.

One of three rolls of an MP is to listen and address the concerns of its constituents. In reality it’s we who are doing all the listening while little of our concerns are addressed. 
So now is your chance by following this link. http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/44225
Below is an article by the Independent which gives more insight to the true state of the UK.
Kind regards,
Gordon.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

23 Responses to “11% for MPs. 1% for the proles they ‘represent’.”

  1. Anonymous says:

    I see another member of Tony Blairs government has been outed as a homosexual.
    Apparently film exists of him at parties with underage boys.
    What is it about left wing politicians and young boys ?
    The mass murderer Dennid Nilsen belonged to hard left groups and was into boy-nobbing parties too .
    Brian P

  2. Anonymous says:

    There’s an old saying about throwing salt over your left shoulder for good luck as the devil is supposed to sit on the left side and an angel sits on the right. Perhaps left wing ungodliness (if that’s even a word)is no coincidence.
    Also the Left side of the brain deals with logic and reason and the right side deals with spiritual and intuition

  3. Anonymous says:

    Hi Tap, I’m sure I was told by MP’s that we live in a world of supply and demand.
    However I can see the demand for petrol and diesel has gone down.
    How do I know this ?, because clearly there are fewer cars using the roads.
    So how come the price of fuel has risen not fallen.
    The MP’s are liars.

  4. Anonymous says:

    And what will the public do?
    They did nothing while the smoking ban was being enforced did they? The simple case of not being allowed a smoke in a pub, yet hypocrites welcomed it after driving their 4×4 to the local for a quick pint.

    The public are apathetic. They really don’t care. They have their celebrity culture and football and that’s fine by them. When the shit really hits the fan, that is when they’re working and all that money’s going on rent, utility bills and taxation, leaving them with barely enough for food will they do something. However then it will be too late.
    They’ll get smacked down by a European army while the bankers continue feeding off of them.

    regards

    Harbinger

    • Anonymous says:

      So well put…so true …especially about smoking ban..note this its a policy that the Nazis first came up with …..like most policys they bring in..and the sheep like follow ….

  5. Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous above,

    I disagree that it was nazi policy. You forget Russia.
    Many people have grown up to demonise the Nazis (National Socialists) but yet fail to see that the worst move Britain ever made was infact to declare war upon Germany. Had they infact done what they should have done – united with Germany to utterly obliterate Russia and communism, we would not be living in the hell we are today. For example had we sided with Germany:

    1. No communism as it would have been looked upon today as nazism is.
    2. No political correctness.
    3. No 1984 Orwellian society.
    4. No Frankfurt School.
    5. No continuing mass immigration into the west
    6. No control of the msm, academia, politics, the judiciary, the police and banking by the Jews because they’d very probably be in either Madagascar or Birobidjan, exiled from every land in this world.
    7. No police state….

    I could go on and on about the reality of what our society would be like today but people will of course throw the ‘nazis were authoritarians who oppressed their people’ rubbish. They ‘oppressed’ the Jews, whom I might add had not just been directly responsible for WW1, but had officially declared war upon Germany (Daily Express March 24th, 1933 [http://www.biblestudysite.com/judeawar.htm]) as well as creating the atmosphere that not only led to their incarceration in work camps, as part of the German war effort (not forgetting as political prisoners) but created WW2 and the huge loss of life (predominantly Christian whites of European origin).

    If you live in a society that has used draconian measures to utterly destroy it (Weimar Republic pre WW2 courtesy of the Jewish Bankers and businessmen) then sadly you need draconian, some will perceive as authoritarian, measures to be implemented in order to ‘put the train back on the track’ so to speak. What people forget is that the only people in Germany who hated Hitler and the nazis were infact the Jews, immigrants and homosexuals. He was loved by the majority of the German populous. So what effectively happened to bring about WW2, was control of the majority, by the minority which led to huge loss of life. And to this day, we still support the alien minority within Germany and their lies that were the cause of the greatest loss of life mankind has ever known. We have demonised a whole people, our own brethren (Angles, Saxons and Jutes who migrated to what we now call England) and sided with the Edomites who not only hate us but want nothing more than our destruction of complete servitude to them.

    It was the communists who wanted (and did) to promote homosexuality upon the west. It was the communists who wanted to promote mass immigration into the west (and they did). It was the communists who were not only predominantly Jewish (those in charge of the administration) but also wanted to see continuing Jewish rule of the western world and the rest of it for that matter.

    I have been reading a lot about history and have sadly found that much of the history of Germany is a lie, nothing but propaganda created to form hatred of Germany and the German people in order to go to war against them. It’s utterly despicable behaviour to say the least.

    regards

    Harbinger

    P.S. I am not a socialist. I do not agree nor ever have with socialism, but given a choice between the total obliteration of my indigenous culture, my traditions and peoples which International Socialism (Internationalism, Communism, Globalism) seeks or the preservation of my culture, my traditions and peoples which National Socialism promotes, then I will always support the latter.

    In fact I will always oppose the destruction of any culture, traditions and peoples on this planet, regardless of race of religious beliefs.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Correction:

    “We have demonised a whole people, our own brethren (Angles, Saxons and Jutes who migrated to what we now call England) and sided with the Edomites who not only hate us but want nothing more than our destruction of complete servitude to them.

    should read:

    “not only hate us but want nothing more than our destruction AND complete servitude to them.”

    regards

    Harbinger

  7. Tapestry says:

    Britain didn’t declare war on Germany. The OWG manipulated Britain into declaring war. Even after the declaration, many people in Britain wanted to form a truce with Hitler. It was only once Churchill was in place that the war could proceed as planned by the elites (with a few helpful assassinations) and Britain and Germany could be manipulated to destroy each other according to plan, making world government by a United Nations more possible to bring about.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Tap,

    With all due respect Britain DID declare war on Germany after it ‘invaded’ Poland. The British population may never have wanted a war (who ever does?) but once the msm, propaganda machine kicked into place the working man went off to fight the bosch, while society persecuted the conscientious objectors for bravely making a stance.

    As much as Iblame the Jews for the demolition of nations, I also realise the non Jews are as much to blame for their blind obedience to authority and inability to simply say no. Given the choice of going to war and killing people who have never done anything to instigate my wrath upon them or going to jail, I’ll choose the latter always.

    And yes, Churchill, was brought in to whip up the public into nationalism and jingoism; a man who was financed and controlled by Zionists. Those behind the NWO have been responsible for all wars, I agree, not forgetting their desire for a one world government, but regardless, had Britain not declared war on Germany, we would not have become embroiled in one, for Germany would never have declared war on us. Moreso, no UK in WW2 would have mean’t no USA either. Britain (tptb) DID declared war on Germany Tap.

    Hitler would have reintegrated German lands taken after the Treaty of Versailles and attacked Russia, most probably with full European and US support Communism would have been utterly obliterated from existence meaning no Chinese revolution, no need for a Hungarian, no Pol Pot and no blooming Che Guevara T-shirts.

    regards

    Harbinger

  9. Tapestry says:

    Harbinger, Hitler was just as much a puppet as Churchill. Trained by Tavistock, financed by the Bushes and Wall Street, he was put into office by central casting, as was Stalin. Averil Harriman ran the Russian war, directed and supplied Stalin, a close relative of Churchill’s mother, Jenny Harriman. WW2 was just a family business run to a pre-ordained plan, and perfectly executed. Hitler didn’t write Mein Kampf or control the German war plan. He was, like the others, a mouthpiece, a puppet, possibly a close relative of Churchill if his father Alois was indeed an illegitimate Rothschild.

  10. Anonymous says:

    Tapestry ,

    In my readings, I’ve found your view (and held by others) to be contrary my findings.

    Yes, I’ve heard of the ‘Tavistock’ connection.
    Yes I’ve heard of the Rothschild connection.

    But….

    What I’ve found tends to destroy both is firstly, If Hitler WAS an MI5 agent, then why would he attempt eight peace offers with the west, which they all refused:

    http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html

    If Hitler WAS an offspring of a Rothschild and/or more importantly a puppet of them then why on earth did he boot the Rothschilds out of Germany and take control of everyone of their institutions in Germany and France?

    Lied About Hitler

    Hitler was a Zionist Stooge

    Zionist shill outs himself as disinfo agent

    Was Hitler a Zionist Stooge?

    If Hitler was a Zionist, Why Did He Arrest Louis de Rothschild?

    Adolf Hitler Speaks Out Against the Brutal British-Jewish Occupation of Palestine

    There was also another link, but I can’t find it, that showed Hitler booted out the Rothschild bankers and their lackies from all the countries they controlled which one wouldn’t do were he working for them would they?

    Tap, I don’t buy that Hitler was a Rothschild or a British Agent. Why?
    Well, it’s really quite simple. History has demonised Hitler. This has been courtesy of the Jewish controlled msm and academia. They did so in order to ingrain utter repulsion for Hitler so as to veer people ever wanting to find out if there is another story, other than the official of who Hitler was and why he did what he did.
    What better way to destroy any possibility that Hitler was infact working in the best interests of the German people and ironical all Europeans, than by claiming he was an agent of the NWO, put there to create WWII and the resultant loss of life?
    Anyone who looks at his policies instituted in Germany will see that they are polarly opposite to what the NWO wants and what has in fact now been implemented via legislation on many European lands.

    I do believe, from research, that Hitler in fact wanted to stop the NWO and world government, very much as Tsar Nicholas the 1st in Russia did back in 1815 at the Congress of Vienna, orchestrated by the Rothschilds.

    The link I’ve provided above proved overwhelmingly that Hitler DID not want to fight the UK, the USA, France or any other European land. He in fact wanted to unite them and promote their indigenous cultures and way of life, completely contrary to what is happening today with globalism (communism/internationalism).

    It’s simply too easy to promote the canard that Hitler was a Rothschild and an MI5 agent. In doing so it’s merely an attempt to fool people into believing he was controlled which I believe he wasn’t.

    As for Mein Kampf, his best work was his second book which completely overshadows his first.

    I know your stance will never change, like WASP’s and Henry Makow’s on this (who seems to be doing a very good job as a disinfo agent).

    regards

    Harbinger.

  11. Anonymous says:

    P.S.

    I expect your average reader to propose I’m a nazi, even though in my last reply I have stated I am no socialist, nor ever have been. But yes, from reading history that the west won’t let school children know, I do sympathise, very much, with Hitler and the German people. Not just because of what happened to them before the Hitler’s rise to power, but after the war, when the brutalisation of many within Germany happened under the tyranny of the Russians, whom we allowed to do what they did and whom we should never have united with in the first place, but in fact destroyed completely.

    I do realise, first and foremost that had we not gone to war with Hitler, we would have averted the deaths of millions of lives. We would also not be under communism today either. These are two incredibly important reasons as to why I believe as I do. Your average moron will attack me, because they don’t think of what society would be like had we not gone to war with Germany, ironically the same morons who whinge about mass immigration, multiculturalism, police states, cultural Marxism and political correctness.

  12. Tapestry says:

    It’s a good argument. Do you deny that the NAZI war machine was funded with ‘American’ money? The first part of any analysis should be ‘who’s funding the show?’

    It is possible Hitler turned against his backers and started to see the light, but there can be no denying the fact that he took the Wall Street dollar to begin with.

    If he did see the light and turn against MI6 and the secret world government, why was he rescued from the bunker and allowed to live on in peace to a ripe old age in South America?

    His handler was Martin Borman. The power behind the SS was the Vatican and the Jesuits. Hitler was truly a bit part player. He takes your eye of the ball by putting too much focus on him. The storyline that a great evil man is turning the world on its head is a great seller in propaganda manuals, movies and novels. In the real world money talks the loudest.

    Hitler delivered the second world war to his backers, and it achieved its objectives, the destruction of the powerful nations of the earth bar one, which is being destroyed now.

  13. Anonymous says:

    Well,

    Hitler was on the cover of Time magazine twice I believe. He turned a dying country, on its knees to Jewish malpractice and utter parasitism of the German people and turned it into an economic powerhouse. He did this by making ‘German Jobs for German workers’ (didn’t a Scottish politician say that about 5 years ago?). After kicking out the Rothschilds he did exactly what Lincoln did with the printing of his German ‘greenbacks’. This was ironically what got Lincoln murdered. There is no doubt that Hitler transformed Germany economically as well as pull millions of Germans out of abject poverty and total despair. This is ‘conveniently’ forgotten, courtesy of his ‘persecution’ of the 1% Jewish population.

    It is fitting therefore to say that Hitler no doubt looked oversees for investment and there was nowhere more wealthier than America. So American industry funded Hitler? And? This was business. How many nations did the Rothschilds and other British/American/European nations fund who were at war with them and/or their allies?
    How many times have we heard the saying: “It’s nothing personal, purely business”?

    Anthony Sutton has written about America’s funding of Hitler however his agenda is dubious as he remaihs silent on Jewry. Hitler and the Third Reich had many western allies? The crown removed King Edward VIII because of his support for Hitler.

    As for Hitler flying to Argentina, well if you’ve read any David Irving, whom I might add was a very well respected historian until he questioned the holocaust, was the only western historian who got into Hitler’s trusted and top staff. He speaks to bodyguards and close personal staff who all confirm Hitler and Braun’s suicide.

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Hitler/death/FSS_release_211207.html

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/7691912/Adolf-Hitler-did-not-shoot-himself.html

    If Hitler was an agent Tap, why did they imprison Rudolf Hess, who obviously flew into the UK to create peace? Moreso why was there an RAF plot to kidnap Hitler?

    http://www.sify.com/news/revealed-raf-s-bizarre-plot-to-kidnap-hitler-through-his-pilot-news-international-lb5mEficfdg.html

    The only plausible explanation I can give to the fiction of Hitler escaping to Argentina is that it would back up the story Hitler was an agent of the allied forces, to compound stories, I believe are false, that his job was to create war (destroyed by successive peace attempts), destroy millions of Europeans and set the scene for a one world government.

    Lastly, when did the stories emerge of Hitler escaping to Argentina? On that note; who wrote the novel “The Boys from Brazil”? And just what was his religion by any chance?

    regards

    Harbinger

  14. Tapestry says:

    It reads very well Harbinger, but the facts of history stretch further into the past. WW2 was designed at the Treaty Of Versailles by the bankers, and was already in Masonic plans as early as 1880. It’s far more exciting to personalise history, and tedious to think it’s all created by a small cabal who pull all the strings.

    Irving always said his study of Hitler ended at the bunker, and began eleven years earlier. That missed out the crucial periods of his rise to power, and his after life in South America. Read The Grey Wolf as listed in Books on this blog. The evidence of Hitler’s escape to South America is surprisingly comprehensive.

    Hitler wasn’t at all popular with the majority of Germans. The economic boom was no doubt necessary to convince Germans to hand him total power. Once achieved, the advantages were got rid of soon enough.

    I can’t argue about Hess. The Abwehr were working for the One World Government throughout WW2, as were O.S.S. and MI5/6.

    All WW2 battles on the western front were suspiciously pointless – Dunkirk. Guderian’s tanks were halted with no explanation. The Battle Of Britain was effectively won by the Luftwaffe then they just stopped a second time. The Radar masts were never attacked once. Then the pointless blitz followed.

    D Day German intelligence pretended they didn’t realise we were attacking at Normandy and ‘fell for’ the Calais deception. At Falaise 200,000 Germans were allowed to escape through a one mile gap which was opened up for them by Allied high command.

    At Arnhem, British tanks were halted as soon as the Americans took Nijmegen Bridge. Patton crossed the Rhine and was a day away from The Ruhr in 1944, and his fuel was cut off.

    It was literally theatre with a preset outcome required. The war had to last til 1945 to please the cabal. Hitler was just a puppet, enforcing the continuation of the war to please his masters/controllers on the promise they wpuld pull him out at the end.

  15. Anonymous says:

    On Hitler’s suicide:

    http://justice4germans.com/2013/06/17/debunking-the-hitler-escaped-myths-forensic-evidence-trumps-rumours-theories-and-romantic-tales/

    Dental records proved the badly burned bodies were Hitler & Eva Braun.
    As for when the stories started on Hitler fleeing to South America they were by Stalin after the war. The book ‘The Boys from Brazil’ by Ira Levin (Jewish) is propaganda to support Stalin’s crazy, disproved, by forensic evidence, theory.

    regards

    Harbinger

  16. Tapestry says:

    Please read Grey Wolf – The Escape Of Adolf HItler. Simon Dunstan, Gerrard Williams. Sterling. It is very convincing with documentary and eye witness testimony. I didn’t believe it either.

  17. Anonymous says:

    “Please read Grey Wolf “ I will, but I highly doubt it will disprove forensic facts Tap. More so for the obvious agenda behind the South America ‘theory’. Now that IS a conspiracy theory.

    As to Hitler allowing the British to escape on many occasions, well, it is certainly good ammunition to use against people who do not believe Hitler was an agent of Britain (like me for instance lol!) however….what I do believe, as do many others on understanding Hitler more than your average Joe, is that he simply had an incredible love for the European races and their cultures, more so the English (being his brethren).

    Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order at Dunkirk:

    “He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..

    According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).”

    (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983)

    Now reading the above, one will think, that’s overwhelming proof that Hitler was an agent. Yet, my theory, is that history’s portrayal of Hitler, that is the Jewish portrayal, is a false one and that he hoped that Britain would see sense and join with Germany in attacking Russia. What Hitler failed to see was that Britain was riddled with the control of Jewry as was Germany before his rise to power.

    Again, Hitler’s peace attempts continually show that he wanted peace, regardless. He did not want to fight the British. He felt very much affiliated with the people, being German (Austrian).

    regards

    Harbinger

  18. Anonymous says:

    Tap,

    I forgot to reply to your comment:

    “Hitler wasn’t at all popular with the majority of Germans. The economic boom was no doubt necessary to convince Germans to hand him total power. Once achieved, the advantages were got rid of soon enough.”

    This just isn’t so.

    This from an anti Hitler and Third reich article:

    “Both Roberts (1938) and Heiden (1939)—prewar anti-Nazi writers— portray Hitler as widely revered and popular among the Germans of their day. As Heiden (1939, p. 98) put it: “The great masses of the people did not merely put up with National Socialism. They welcomed it”. And Madden (1987) presents modern-day scholarly evidence derived from archival research to show that Nazis came from all social classes in large numbers.

    That Hitler’s constantly expressed love of his people and belief in their greatness should have earned him their love and belief in return is not at all surprising but it is very unfashionable to mention it. A book recently released in Germany, however, does make some allusion to it. Excerpt from a review of it:

    “A well-respected German historian has a radical new theory to explain a nagging question: Why did average Germans so heartily support the Nazis and Third Reich? Hitler, says Goetz Aly, was a “feel good dictator,” a leader who not only made Germans feel important, but also made sure they were well cared-for by the state. To do so, he gave them huge tax breaks and introduced social benefits that even today anchor the society. He also ensured that even in the last days of the war not a single German went hungry. Despite near-constant warfare, never once during his 12 years in power did Hitler raise taxes for working class people. He also—in great contrast to World War I—particularly pampered soldiers and their families, offering them more than double the salaries and benefits that American and British families received. As such, most Germans saw Nazism as a “warm-hearted” protector, says Aly, author of the new book “Hitler’s People’s State: Robbery, Racial War and National Socialism” and currently a guest lecturer at the University of Frankfurt”

    Link: http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/why_hitler_hated_jews

    The doubting of the majority of Germans’ love for Hitler can only really be explained by those who read western propaganda, more importantly, Jewish propaganda. Again, what better way than to portray him as am authoritarian was to say that the people hated him?

    Much of what I’ve been taught about History is a lie Tap. I’m finding that much I’ve learned of Hitler to be the same. And why? Again, in order to continually portray him as a figure of hate, in order to keep people away from reading the ‘alternative history’ that our gatekeepers don’t want you to know. Can you imagine the impact if it is found out that Hitler was the complete opposite of what history has portrayed him as?

    Our western society is crumbling under foundations built of Jewish falsehoods. The lie is continually promoted in order to protect the tribe from the wrath of the public and so they will, as they always have, continue to lie, lie and lie in order to protect themselves and their desires of their New World Order.

    I do believe one day Hitler, the Third Reich, Germany, the holocaust and WW2 will be given a full hearing by an impartial committee who will come to the conclusion that most, if not all we know is in fact nothing but lie after lie, there for a reason. And just like the Jimmy Saville situation, there will be no one to attack for this because they’ll all be dead, other than the Jews that is and as long as they hold power within the west, they will do their best to see that the truth remains hidden.

    regards

    Harbinger

  19. Anonymous says:

    Thankyou for the debate Tap.

    regards

    Harbinger

  20. Tapestry says:

    I see Liddel Hart as the deception as regards The Battle of Britain, as a classic OWG cover-up historian acceptable to the elites and given prominence.

    The OWG wanted Britain firmly committed to the war with no talk of peace. The BOB and the blitz made sure no one would talk of peace but only of defeating Hitler. Hitler was the red rag to Churchill’s bull, and of course everyone believed it was genuine at the time.

    You can see that this severe provocation was carried out purely to ensure Britain got sucked in to war as part of the OWG’s long term plan to destroy Britain’s Empire, and get Germany to smash herself in an unwinnable war against the Soviet Union. If Hitler wanted peace with Britain, he wouldn’t have been toying with invasion and wasting time and resources, ensuring he had a constant, determined and undefeated enemy on his hands, able to bring in the USA later, which was planned from the start. These were the objectives of the OWG, for whom Hitler was purely a puppet, who carried out actions to order, just as did Churchill and Stalin.

  21. Tapestry says:

    It’s an interesting debate, I agree, Harbinger.

  22. Anonymous says:

    We have two possibilities in relation to Hitler & the Third Reich but undoubtedly the Treaty of Versailles and deliberated economic obliteration of Germany was most certainly One World Government(OWO)/New World Order pre planned in order to create WW2.

    Firstly there is the your theory (and others) that Hitler was an agent of the crown/OWG, trained at the Tavistock Institute to rise to power in Germany by capitalising on the economic sanctions imposed under Versailles, harvesting an unhappy German population, while as a Rothschild, making sure Britain wasn’t invaded, yet dilly dallying when resources should have been used in an assault on Russia, deliberately resulting in horrendous loss of life. Hitler then escaped to South America.

    Secondly there is my theory (and others) that Hitler wasn’t a Rothschild or a British Agent. That because of experiences in WW1, the effect of Versailles on Germany and seeing how the Jews had not only destroyed Germany but were responsible for WW1 he set about a plan to remove (expel) Jews from Germany (and the rest of Europe) and ally with Europe to destroy the communist threat. That he didn’t dilly dally but instead wished to still form peace with Britain and build stronger ties hence why he allowed the Dunkirk evacuation. He died in Germany with Eva Braun and history has lied about him and the Third Reich.

    Interesting but only one is right, unless that is he was an agent, saw sense and turned against the NWO (again your theory).
    Which one though is the question?

    regards

    Harbinger

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.