“A nation can be one or the other, a
democracy or an imperialist, but it
can’t be both.”
– Chalmers Johnson.
If you don’t know what historian
Chalmers Johnson has to say about
the future of the United States.
TAP – He talks of internal corruption being a prime factor. What is not mentioned is whether that corruption is a deliberate device of the supremely wealthy. Imagine if you were the richest person in Rome by far. If the Empire prospered, others would no doubt rise up to equal your wealth and power over time. But if you managed to collapse that Empire and cast all others into ruin, while at the same time you preserved your own supreme wealth, you or your descendants would then be able to start new nations and empires to ride on, as they grew up, unaware you were controlling them from the shadows. They in turn could be collapsed from within before anyone else could get to the pinnacle of power and wealth.
People are becoming aware of Rothschild wealth getting so great over the last two hundred and more years. But what if the Rothschild position merely repeated that of their predecessors throughout history, and Rome was deliberately destroyed by its super wealthy banksters, as was Britain’s Empire, Russia’s and all others over thousands of years? It would make sense to see the source of power not as nations, but as families, dynasties and the secret organisations they control.
What would you do if the supreme family was yours? You might be a well-meant person who wouldn’t care one way or the other, but you might then be ‘removed’ by another individual within your family who could see how to achieve total power. There has been a little pruning within the ranks of the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. If you were driven by a desire to rape children, or murder children, you would always need to be supremely powerful over all other human beings to be able to satisfy your requirements. No democracy would ever tolerate such criminal leanings.