19 Responses to “Rt Hon Mark Francois says chemtrails are not biological material being sprayed on the public”

  1. Paul says:

    So basically he is another known liar.

  2. Twig says:

    A follow up letter is required to find out why some contrails have no vapour gap and stretch from horizon to horizon lingering for hours, and can stop and start suddenly. And why do the planes sometimes do a u-turn when the “contrail” stops?

  3. Nixon Scraypes says:

    Ever felt you were being con-ed?Smexpre30

  4. Anonymous says:

    Just another Jew controlled muppet, the sooner we have our own Parliament, the better.

  5. Anonymous says:

    The Wally obviously never read this blog.

  6. Anonymous says:

    What can you expect from a chap who has a BA in history and a MA in war studies who thinks Britain won the war when in reality it was the banksters. There is little hope for those who have been wrongly educated and are all to willing to follow the status quo to advance their career.

    Gordon.

  7. Anonymous says:

    No MP is going to admit to chemtrails.

    All these MP’s know whats going on but think they can hide away with a load of BS on a standard letter.

  8. DP says:

    They deny the gatekeepering term chemtrails but they cannot deny
    “GEOENGINEERING”

  9. Anonymous says:

    @ DP 1:31 am

    No. They don’t deny geo-engineering, They say geo-engineering is ‘preventing global warming’. Al Gore, another piece of shit politician the world doesn’t need.

    And yes, it is ‘preventing global warming’ because the sun’s rays can’t get past the shite that is being sprayed in the air and people are not getting the natural source of vitamin D they need. All part of Agenda 21.

    Try telling that your local MP that.

    In fact. Scratch that… they will just label it with Marxist university training as ‘Conspiracy theory’ although all the ‘official’ (love that word ‘official’ lol) Agenda 21 documents are in the public domain.

  10. texlahoma says:

    This guy not only insults our intelligence, he forces it behind the bushes, has his way with it and pretends it never even existed.

  11. Anonymous says:

    I believe an independent study carried out by a scientific body totally unrelated to any aspect of government is what is required. Faced with the kind of truth and evidence such an organization would provide could force these lying scumbags into finally telling the truth and admitting to what WE already know to be the facts. It doesn’t actually require any scientific study to understand what is being perpetrated upon the masses but at least it would wake up the sheeple and send a shot across the bows of the establishment criminals.

    Maybe the same organization who first identified and publicized the existence and reality of toxic fumes within the in-flight aircraft cabin could be approached to help the public on this issue?

    http://www.aerotoxic.org/

    Govts. routinely deny the air pumped around during a flight is unsafe while all evidence points in the opposite direction.
    WE NEED TO FULLY ACCEPT THAT OUR CRIMINAL GOVTs. ROUTINELY AND CONSISTENTLY LIE TO US ON ANY AND EVERY SUBJECT INCLUDING MATTERS RELATING TO OUR OWN HEALTH, WELL-BEING, OUR OWN SAFETY AND, THEIR PROVEN AND OBVIOUS SELF-SERVING, NEFARIOUS ACTIVITIES ACROSS THE BOARD! .

    http://www.brodkowitzlaw.com/toxic-fumes-on-airplanes.aspx

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/toxic-fumes-in-airliner-cabins-ignored-by-authorities-223448/

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/toxic-cabin-air-accepted-as-reality-but-illness-still-denied-339341/

    reiverdave

  12. Anonymous says:

    I believe an independent study carried out by a scientific body totally unrelated to any aspect of government is what is required. Faced with the kind of truth and evidence such an organization would provide could force these lying scumbags into finally telling the truth and admitting to what WE already know to be the facts. It doesn’t actually require any scientific study to understand what is being perpetrated upon the masses but at least it would wake up the sheeple and send a shot across the bows of the establishment criminals.

    Maybe the same organization who first identified and publicized the existence and reality of toxic fumes within the in-flight aircraft cabin could be approached to help the public on this issue?

    http://www.aerotoxic.org/

    Govts. routinely deny the air pumped around during a flight is unsafe while all evidence points in the opposite direction.
    WE NEED TO FULLY ACCEPT THAT OUR CRIMINAL GOVTs. ROUTINELY AND CONSISTENTLY LIE TO US ON ANY AND EVERY SUBJECT INCLUDING MATTERS RELATING TO OUR OWN HEALTH, WELL-BEING, OUR OWN SAFETY AND, THEIR PROVEN AND OBVIOUS SELF-SERVING, NEFARIOUS ACTIVITIES ACROSS THE BOARD! .

    http://www.brodkowitzlaw.com/toxic-fumes-on-airplanes.aspx

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/toxic-fumes-in-airliner-cabins-ignored-by-authorities-223448/

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/toxic-cabin-air-accepted-as-reality-but-illness-still-denied-339341/

    reiverdave

  13. NPP says:

    I attended a Chemtrails meeting in Norwich. Fascinating stuff…
    I posted this TAP link on one of the speakers’ FaceBook page. He replied:

    “Again, the terminology game. “chemtrails” “spraying” etc. The last sentence is telling. Id be comfortable if they removed the word “spraying” altogether 🙂 The preferred word used in geo engineering is “release” but again, the word suggests intent. If the “contrails” are modified there is no “spraying” or “releasing” so easily deniable. Also the slight of hand trick is used. Peoples initial concerns of the trails is that on a regular basis they can & do completely block the skies. That they’re aesthetically repulsive and unnatural. That’s what drives people to dig deeper. Unfortunately we fall for the ‘chemtrail conspiracy theory’ terminology/explanation (the psyop) which makes us approach the concerns in a manner that the establishment can control. The reply is designed to focus on the “trail” itself and to negate the fact that they can and do completely block the sun. “… cooled by the air, they may produce tiny water droplets or, if the air is cold enough tiny ice crystals…” such poetic soft terminology. Edward Bernays would be proud 😉 Again the “harmless water vapor” reply. A ripple on the water can become a wave, become tidal then become a tsunami. I once saw an early neo con reply, in the early day of the iraq war (II) to ‘waterboarding torture’ (Before it was normalized). “Harmless water that simulates submergence and perceived drowning” :)”

  14. 5 am heavy covering of the sky over bristol, 2 planes in sky with 3 trails already laid, by 9 am sky is murky and stays that way for most of the day.
    Andy

  15. Anonymous says:

    Hi all,
    Hope you enjoyed reading this honest mans reply!
    If anyone has any good factual links that I can copy and paste and send Mark Francois would be gratly appreciated.
    Thanks for interest in the post!

    James.

  16. Anonymous says:

    So basically what this guy is saying is that aircraft technology has gone backwards over the last say, 20 years, because this crap certainly wasn’t hanging around destroying the blue skies we had then (?)

  17. Anonymous says:

    Er, sorry, it was. Just that you have more recently become aware of it.

  18. Gordon Logan says:

    On Sunday 14th July there was a lot of chemtrail activity over Edinburgh. There was one very voluminous trail about three miles long over the central park district. It was at low altitude and targetted thousands of people who were sunbathing below. Mr Francois clearly does not know the difference between a contrail, which is thin and of short duration and a chemtrail which becomes thicker and is of long duration.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.