Did Thatcher have the first clue about Savile?

Reading the letter from the Public Records Office for Margaret Thatcher from Jimmy Savile, published in The Mail,  you wonder if she had the first clue about him.  It reads as if he’s in full control manipulating her isolation and loneliness at the top of the slippery poll.

It reads as if she’s bought the story and is hooked in.  It must be very lonely at the top.  Here was someone who was dressed up as her best friend.

What do you think?

Just as with The Falklands, the EU and many other things,  was she told anything?  Surrounded by pedophiles, Europhiles and Satanists plotting her demise, she was no doubt kept out of the loop on all fronts.  She came across as more naive than evil to me, trusting many people she shouldn’t have.  Don’t tell Glenda Jackson though.

See Was new Pope implicated in Thatcher’s death?

EXTRACT –

Commencing in September of 1981, the present Pope Francis 1 acted as an agent for the Argentine military Junta to acquire Exocet missiles which were used against the Royal Navy flotilla during the Falklands War the following year.
During September and October of 1981, Pope Francis, as then-priest Jorge Mario Bergoglio, applied through his friend Roberto Calvi, a high official in the Vatican Bank, for the funds that allowed the Argentine Junta to buy “at least twenty” of the Exocet missiles at a cost of over $200 million, according to the British source.
The same source stated to an ITCCS officer in London on April 9, 2013,
“The Junta knew the British would oppose their seizure of the Malvinas so they got their man Father Bergoglio to get them the missiles, since he was friends with Roberto Calvi. Margaret Thatcher was the Prime Minister in 1982, and both she and Buckingham Palace knew that it was Bergoglio who had lined up the missile funding for (General) Videla. Thatcher in fact approved an MI-6 plan to eliminate the priest, Father Bergoglio, but that fizzled out. But now that same priest has become the Pope, and Thatcher just suddenly died, and the Queen is stepping down under rumored assassination fears, after she had already cancelled her March 6 trip to Rome when it became clear that Bergoglio would become Pope. These are not coincidences.”
After the Exocet missile deal was successfully concluded, the relatively unknown cleric, Fr. Jorge Bergoglio, was rapidly elevated in the Argentine Catholic hierarchy. He became the head of the entire Roman Catholic Church in Argentina in 1998 as part of his reward.
On June 17, 1982 – just two months after the start of the Falklands War – Bergoglio’s Vatican bank associateRoberto Calvi was found dead, hanging under Blackfriar’s Bridge in London.
Two books have confirmed the Vatican Bank and Roberto Calvi’s link to the Argentine Exocet deal: In God’s Name by David Yallop, and The Entity: Five Centuries of Secret Vatican Espionage by Eric Frattini.
Is the Jesuit Pope Francis linked to the deaths of Roberto Calvi and former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and to an assassination plan against Queen Elizabeth? This evidence and recent events certainly suggest so.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

18 Responses to “Did Thatcher have the first clue about Savile?”

  1. Anonymous says:

    She knew, she kept awful company and was complicit.

  2. Tapestry says:

    If she was complicit and knew what Savile was, he wouldn’t have written such a letter to her.

  3. dognamedblue says:

    would it come as any surprise that an “elected” official puppet had “plausable deniability”?
    or that said “elected” official knew they had it & was more than happy to be in a position to say I knew nothing? or worse I don’t want to know? you can say she didn’t know but to suggest that internal security services MI5 didn’t is another question altogether

  4. Tapestry says:

    MI5 knew and orchestrated and arranged the evil. Thatcher was not meant to have won the leadership, and they tried every trick in the book to eliminate her and her key supporters. Character assassination and real.

    Savile was obviously used to control her to some extent. She must have known he had ‘influence’ with the Royals and so on, but did she know he was a child rapist and possibly a murderer. I doubt it.

  5. Julia says:

    I think it’s hard to acknowledge that someone you are a fan of is knowingly part of the elitist evil. You really want to let them off the hook. I was never any fan of Thatcher, but I struggle with the possibility of David Bowie or Bob Geldof or the Dalai Llama being part of it.

    Either every Prime minister is in on it, or none of them, I think. Are they all stupid puppets doing as they are told, or do they know what is going on? If they don’t know what is going on, then they are deliberately turning a blind eye, not wanting to look. And they are motivated by their own greed and ego. The more I learn, the more I think the people in public view are stupid puppets.They can’t have people in the public domain with too much knowledge, someone might let something slip out.

    They are all like actors in a play, inviting the audience to sympathise with them or loathe them. They are just caricatures playing something out. The idea that any prime minister makes any of the decisions is a complete joke.

  6. Anonymous says:

    she was scum, destroyed this country.

  7. Tapestry says:

    Senior politicians seem to be unaware of another level of manipulation. They complain of resistance from within the Civil Service, other politicians but never seem to imagine they are simply the actors in a play for which someone else wrote the script.

    Some leaders like Blair, Brown, Cameron and Clegg seem very aware of the subservient role they are acting out. Thatcher didn’t seem to realise, and acted her own script.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Many Ted Heath was “acting” also.

  9. Tapestry says:

    Ted Heath was another one who knew well what was going on. As Icke said, a serial child killer. So far no one has sent information to the blog that Thatcher knew what was going on, or was a part of it, and we’ve had a lot of stuff sent in on many many others. David Icke hasn’t indicated anything about her as I know of.

  10. A10Sean says:

    Tap .. Have you looked at any of ian cranes stuff .. Apart from the usual banking stuff , he has interesting stuff on left brain right brain conscious … He also has thoughts on the origin of species which ties into sitchens .. He currently has a uk tour on the go .. I might go to see his talk up in edinburgh … Haven’t seen you mention sitchens for a wee while , so perhaps you have it all worked ou now !!! Sean

  11. A10Sean says:

    Sorry Tap … Just read your sitchens update a few stories back … Haven’t been reading everything recently sorry !! Sean

  12. Anonymous says:

    Every politician more or less has dirt on them/skeletons in the closet. That’s how their puppet master/globalist controllers/TPTB manipulate them.

    Thatcher must have known about the pedo rings; she was hated by many, but she wasn’t stupid/oblivious to what was going on behind the scenes.

    The thing is, how many politicians are willing to risk their career/lives by whistle-blowing? JFK was about to blow the lid on the Federal Reserve and look what happened to him.

  13. Anonymous says:

    David Icke says that her husband has been named in some of the recent paedophile investigations

  14. Tapestry says:

    I don’t trust recent paedophile investigations. Exaro News says top policeman in Operation Yewtree has resigned. Many of the accusations have targeted people who were spilling the story – Max Clifford, Jim Davidson and so on. Icke would be a third of that variety. Not one politician has been named……….

  15. Tapestry says:

    ..correction – living politician.

  16. Anonymous says:

    Tap – Interesting.

    P.s. WASP – I see the Pilgrims are attending!

  17. Anonymous says:

    Not one politician has been named…

    Doesn’t mean they are not implicated.

    Names need to named.

    Just depends who’s got the balls to name and shame.

    The truth WILL out. It’s always the way as history has shown.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.