Spivey comments on Rantzen

Posted: 06 Mar 2013 11:24 PM PST
The Express/judgmental.org.uk
Spivs comment
Well, well, well. What have we here then?
It seems that Esther Rantzen wasn’t covering up for another paedophile – despite what the Sunday People would have you believe. I say that because Rantzen sued the Mirror Group and the Sunday Peoples Editor, Richard Stott for claiming she did.
Course, there was no denying that Rantzen knew that Alex Standish, a School Teacher was a paedophile. She just didn’t tell anyone about it… She was leaving that to the Police since they also knew… And also did nothing. Hmmm.
The following Express article is a report on the subsequent libel trial, dated Friday, November the 29th, 1991. Rantzen got a result and was initially awarded £250,000 damages, later reduced to £110,000 on appeal.  
So, lets recap.
Esther Rantzen admitted to knowing about Jimmy Savile being a raving monster loony sex case nonce… But did fuck all about it.
The former child actor Ben Fellows alleges that Rantzen was also at a perv’s party where he was plied with drink, drugs and chatted up by paedophiles. Ben further alleges that despite Rantzen knowing that he was only 15 years old at the time, the goofy bitch never intervened.
In 1994 a 5yr old girl was molested by an old fella in Rantzens swimming pool…  But that was fuck all to do with her either.
And now we have her being accused of  shielding another sex monster. Hmmm… Never far away from the thick of it is she… Just saying.
Below the article there is a copy of the court ruling, which has all the relevant facts. Had this court case taken place today, I doubt that she would have been so lucky. 
Libel trials have been known to get it wrong, don’t cha know. Just ask Bruce Grobbelaar, Lord Boothby, Jeffery Archer, Lance Armstrong and John Major, to name but a few.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Responses to “Spivey comments on Rantzen”

  1. Anonymous says:

    All these pedophiles that have worked in the BBC, or people that have first-hand knowledge of pedophiles that have worked in the BBC.

    Perhaps the ‘BBC TV Licence’ needs renaming to ‘BBC Pedophile Licence’.

    Seriously, why do people contribute towards this vile organization.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Hi Tap, Is Spivey a Yorkshireman, sounds like he likes to ‘call a spade a spade’.
    Trouble is, we cannot say what we want, even if it’s true.
    All these Laws were fastened onto us to stop the truth being told.
    Freemasons run every aspect of the Law, from Solicitors to Barristers to Judges.
    All the different kinds of Law were developed to take away our Common Law Rights.
    This is the reason nothing will get done about Paedophiles.

  3. Anonymous says:

    i worked in child protection, rantzen knew, margaret hodge knew and so did rupert murdoch

  4. Darcy says:

    Well I believe; child protection? Rantzen knew, Margaret Hodge knew and so did Rupert Murdoch et al!

    Sayanim ALL!

    Hodge is now saying and I quote,
    Margaret Hodge MP, chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, said Serco had “fallen unacceptably short of essential standards of quality and safety”.
    She said: “Although no evidence suggests that patients have received unsafe care, it is shocking that there were not enough people on the job.”
    She found it “disgraceful and “astonishing” that Serco had “fiddled the figures 252 times”.

    How many times did Hodge fiddle the pederasts figures!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.