NHS. Don’t risk it, say staffers.

The NHS is just one huge test-lab for Big-Pharma.

‘Liverpool Care Pathway’ takes care of the patients that are deemed unprofitable to Big-Pharma. In other words, starve the patient of vital minerals and supplements as the government/Big-Pharma have taken it upon themselves to deem them unfit/unprofitable to society (kudos to this lovely lady: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223836/I-survived-death-pathway-Patricia-82-given-days-live-family-defied-doctors-gave-water-straw–shes-planning-world-cruise.html).

For the rest of the population, they are subjected to Big-Pharma drugs which can do you more harm than good, hospital food which was long ago out-sourced to companies that couldn’t care less about hygiene and food nutritional value. And don’t forget about MRSA and countless other ‘super-bugs’.

Do you really want to risk your life in the NHS’s hands?

Staff morale levels in the NHS are at an all time low too… I know plenty of staff that work in the NHS. My partner has worked for them for nearly 11 years and most of her friends are NHS staffers too.

Anonymous

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Responses to “NHS. Don’t risk it, say staffers.”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Do you remember when you were growing up how the Nazis and Communists were (rightly) highlighted as a example to any undemocratic or authoritarian actions by governments or those in power?, it was hammered into us at school and via the media was it not?, and yet today we have the LCP and no one compares this to the euthenasia and eugenics carried out in the early 20th century. Recently I have read a few comments that have been put into the newspapers that criticise anyone for using the Nazis as a comparisson, I wonder why that is????

    Could it be that in the age of Common Purpose and increasingly Orwellian behaviours being displayed by our masters, that the Nazis and Communist’s atrocities are just a little too close to the mark with what is happening today?

    Tony B.Liar, “the Miranda man” once said that once the wartime generation were gone that his third way (and I challenge anyone to deny that this isnt being carried forward by his clone Camer moron), would flourish. now bear in mind that Common Purpose was a baby of Noo labour, and is also the darling of Tory Francis Mud, then it does seem that this whole Communazi project is a cross party agenda, and I dont bet for one minute that hardline Marxists, the Millipede Bros wont carry it on once they take over the charade of democracy.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Is it me?

    Seems so much clear controlled marketing adds photos are now multi cultural.

    As seemingly needs meets desired ends.

    However I’ve noticed with the advent of the latest cash cull re Child benefit seemingly aimed at the upper class? UK groups.

    ALL engineered presented FAMILY photo’s references are ALL “WHITE” !!!!! WTF?

    Got to Be a first for some decades??

    SEE:-

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/pensions/article-2192562/Trick-avoid-losing-child-benefit-boost-pension.html

    http://uk.yahoo.com/?fr=opera-sd

    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/child-benefit-payment-cut-off-families-020119735.html#ZXAmZ3N

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11466178

    http://www.parentdish.co.uk/2010/10/06/child-benefit-cuts-how-will-the-loss-of-benefits-affect-you/

    http://www.parentdish.co.uk/videos-partner/child-benefit-plans-to-be-reviewed-517292105/

    http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?q=Child+benefit+uk&um=1&hl=en&sa=N&tbo=d&tbm=isch&tbnid=kpjLlzF01H-9BM:&imgrefurl=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/tax/9781037/Child-benefit-how-to-beat-the-tax.html&docid=k1_SfCsas3zYRM&imgurl=http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02107/child-benefit_2107806b.jpg&w=620&h=388&ei=g8vpUJDPFMKN0wXmyIG4Ag&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=2&vpy=46&dur=895&hovh=177&hovw=284&tx=129&ty=78&sig=117768392922942966854&page=5&tbnh=144&tbnw=251&start=52&ndsp=13&ved=1t:429,r:52,s:0,i:266&biw=1024&bih=684

    & just gently scroll down:-
    http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Child%20benefit%20uk&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.d2k&bpcl=40096503&biw=1024&bih=684&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=esvpUMSRK8qV0QWc1IGQAw

    your thoughts Please?

    HETT rants

  3. wasp says:

    Hi Tap, I have sent this in a couple of times but it obviously didn’t arrive or has been scrubbed, but can’t imagine why, as it is only a bbit of information I put together, with regard to the ongoing filter problem related to The Chemtrails.

    I would suggest you look up the required items under Industrial Tools & Accessories, this is the Type of Site I would Refer you to.
    Link:- http://www.cromwell.co.uk/

    Enter Required Item in Search Box i.e. Dust Masks
    Link:- http://www.cromwell.co.uk/index.php?search_all=Dust+Masks&search.x=0&search.y=0&p=advancedsearch&q=0
    Doing it this way you are using a Specific Search Engine, & wont get sidetracked by a load of Google Rubbish.

    You can then refine your search as necessary.
    Filtering out nano particles is virtually impossible with the average masks,I would think, but nano particles do behave as gases so it might be possible, but should remove larger particulate matter. CARBON FILTERS HAVE THE CAPACITY TO ADSORB GASES, this is a Surface Phenomena.
    Think of the carbon particles as individual sponges, i.e. A Matrix or Lattice of individual Interstitial Sites, each with the capacity to latch onto a contaminant, The Larger the Surface Area, the Greater the Capacity for ADSORPTION will be. Considering Nano Particles as they are so small the efficiency of removal would be increase with decrease in particle size due to Brownian Motion as Diffusion is Inversely Proportional to Particle Size see pdf, but specialist filters would probably be required.

    When nano particles a being considered we are looking at particles of the order of 5 – 500 nm {1nm = 1/10 A°}, so these masks are going to be fairly expensive,if indeed they exist in the form of dust masks, that are readily available. You would probable have to consider polymeric materials as suitable filtering media, anything else would probably fail, as you will see if you carry out a search.

    Nanotechnology and Respirator Use Issues
    Here is a Link to a 3M Tecnical Data Sheet #171

    Little work has been done to quantify the performance of respirator filtersa gainst particles in the nanoparticle size range.
    It is still widely accepted that with diffusion as the dominant mechanism, the efficiency of filters will be high. In addition, all of the particulate filters approved by NIOSH (95–99.97%) exhibit filter efficiencies greater than that of the
    fiberglass filter papers shown in

    Face Fit
    Another factor affecting respirator performance is face seal leakage.
    Face seal leakage is dependent on many factors including the fit of the respirator to the face, duration of wearing, and work activity.
    Some individuals have speculated that face fit is even more critical for nanoparticles because of their small size, implying that face fit is more critical for nanosize particles than for other contaminants. It is often stated, however, that nanoparticles
    may behave like gases and vapors and respirators have been fit tested and successfully used for protection

    pdf Link:- http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?66666UuZjcFSLXTtMxMalxM2EVuQEcuZgVs6EVs6E666666–

    Those involved in carrying out this Research Work, Probably have no Idea that there are Psychopaths intent on the release of the Nano Particles as Part of a The Nato AGENDA 21 PROGRAMME. i.e.GENOCIDE PROGRAMME

    I will send you some more Stuff shortly, but it is Overwhelming the amount of information, that’s around, & that too needs ‘Filtering’.

    REGARDS ………. WASP

  4. Toad Hall says:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jan/06/nhs-services-private-sector-doctors

    The governments intention is clear: The NHS is merely to become an insurance scheme, with service provision contracted out to the (cheapest) willing provider. This will result in profit margins defining the quality of patient care delivered. As large organisations can introduce economies of scale, and employ armies of ‘management consultants’ to streamline the process of healthcare into a few pathways, big business will be the winner, as in all other areas of life.
    The privatisation agenda will soon extend to GP surgeries being outcompeted by the likes of Tescodoc’ and ‘Virgin Healthcare’, who will cut to the bone services and take loss leaders to drive independent GP surgeries out of business in their competing localities. They will do this by employing cheap overseas doctors on short term contracts, nursing staff with minimal experience and unqualified health care assistants to deliver care. It will be frugal, tick-box and faceless.
    In a few years, it is clear that the NHS will simply be a ‘brand’ of cut price basic health care (your ‘Aldi’ or ‘Netto’) so to speak, and there simply to proviide nothing except the very minimum, and if you wish anything more, then private health care insurance will be mandatory.
    This is the legacy of New Labour, and accelerated by the Con-Dem coalition.. The NHS as a state institution that protects all of our people has been iredeemably lost.

    Alan Woodall (GP, NHS Wales)

  5. Tapestry says:

    Nothing is more likely to persuade people to impale themselves on NHS accelerated death programmes, than spreading the myth of scarcity of resources.

    There is absolutely nothing we need from the NHS. You can buy any pharmacy you need, anti-biotics e.g. on the internet from abroad.

    Scarcity is non-existant. The shelves are loaded with over-priced mostly ineffective or worse pharmacy, traded by a worldwide cartel. It is only the law which forbids people to have access to it in Britain, so the poison can be given to them ‘free’.

    In many countries you can buy all pharmacy you require over the counter. Only in the UK is it forbidden, and you are forced to consult useless and totally unnecessary doctors trained and rewarded by the pharmaceutical industry to build their profits.

    The NHS is entirely a death-promoting agency with its carefully managed ‘pathways’, and ‘accidental’ spreading of lethal diseases inside its hospitals. We can do without the thing entirely. It’s a total farce, and everyone knows it.

    We’d all have far better health if we could get rid of the lot of them, and get back to simple home-made remedies and health maintenance. The sooner the NHS is destroyed, and we can get rid of the obstructiveness, the better.

    And think of the GBP 100 billion we w0uld save every year.

  6. Paul says:

    Hett,

    Look at all the knife crime photos as well, every single hand holding a knife has been white, and they have been publicising the lawrence case again, 20 yrs on, whilst ignoring others where the victim was white.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.