BREAKING: “LEVESON IS GOING TO SET YOU UP” source inside Leveson Inquiry tells Ben Fellows

Leveson Enquiry looks for way to silence Ben Fellows, who gives a clue as to the real reason Jacintha Saldanha died.

Hi Tap

The prank call by Australian radio presenters who got a condition report from the Duchess of Cambridge’s nurse by pretending to be the Queen and Prince Charles proves the need for new privacy laws, Lord Justice Leveson has said.
However, I received a disturbing telephone call this afternoon from one of Lord Justice Leveson’s key advisors. I should note before continuing that due to the fact that Lord Justice Leveson has stopped his own people from speaking out, I will not be naming my source from within his own camp, under any circumstances. I’m just going to lay out my conversation with my source and include as much information as is pertinent.
The source stated that “because you have written articles about Ken Clarke on the internet making serious allegations of sexual assault. Leveson is going to set you up saying that you are indulging in gossip on the internet to discredit a senior member of parliament.” he went on to say that “Once you and the bloggers who published your articles have been dealt with in the press, then the government will rush in new laws to deal with censorship of the internet. In other words you’re going to be the poster child for internet censorship.” my source said. “This is all happening so that the government can bring in, what appears to be from the public point of view, legitimate press censorship – but of course it isn’t.”
I asked my source if this was true then why hadn’t Ken Clarke sued me already? I haven’t received so much as a solicitor’s letter from Clarke or The Cabinet Office. My source said “Ken Clarke was told not to sue you so that they could use your allegations to bring about censorship of the web”. Whilst dazed in a stupor as my brain computed the horrifying prospect of going down in history as the man who brought about internet censorship. I asked my source why they contacted me now? My source replied “I’m giving you five minutes notice of what’s going to happen to you. Don’t say you weren’t warned!” the source went on “I fundamentally disagree with what Leveson is doing. It’s state corruption of the highest order and is close to meeting the definition of tyranny against the British Public.”
So now I guess I know what Leveson meant when he talked about salacious gossip on the internet. Or rather, who he was talking about! Do I believe this? Should I believe this? Should you believe this? 

The world has taken leave of its senses of late and we are being pushed into a financial and social collapse created by out of control foreign bankers. They’ve even disbanded the military for a month and now they want to get their hands on the internet. So for the corporate takeover of this country to be complete. In order to have a state controlled and licensed media. You would need to shut down bloggers and journalists on the internet who have differing opinions to that of the government. So it makes perfect sense, if we’re living in Nazi Germany, the former Eastern Bloc or China but this is Great Britain…or is it?
All the best
Ben Fellows
EARLIER POST

http://the-tap.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/breaking-ben-fellowes-goes-to-police.html

TAP Ben has gone to the Police with his allegations.  Ken Clarke must realise that Ben has evidence for the allegations he is making.  Clarke says he is wrongly identified. 

As for using the hospital prank call as the pretext for new privacy laws, is that why Jacintha Saldanha ‘suicided’ – to give Leveson a bit more of an excuse for ending press freedom in Britain?  Otherwise this is just another death that happens right in the public eye and makes little sense.  You might have provided the key that unlocks the mystery here, Ben.

As for the threats, let’s see.  You did the right thing passing them on.

COMMENTS –

Anonymous said…
This is what happened.

The Royals were pissed off, so they sent their agent to kill her as revenge.

Or someone from hospital was paid to kill.

Things the media fail to report are: When it happened, where exactly in the hospital, were the cameras on, why isn’t footage released, why isn’t an autopsy done?

What was her mental health like?

This is suspicious

6:14 AM 

Anonymous said…

Add to the above list was she in good health at the time of death. Did she have any sort of terminal illness. When will the body be released. Will relatives in India be allowed to her returned and buried. And, will they allow an autopsy in India.
We’ve seen all too often this scenario played out and read it like a book.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

13 Responses to “BREAKING: “LEVESON IS GOING TO SET YOU UP” source inside Leveson Inquiry tells Ben Fellows”

  1. Tapestry says:

    Maybe they bumped off Jacintha to create as big a scandal as possible for the end result they desire. I wouldn’t put it past them.

    Ken Clarke didn’t sue as you have witnesses, film evidence and credibility. The political paedophiles are determined not to be named publicly, and will twist and turn all ways to avoid exposure of what they are. The truth will out.

  2. Toad Hall says:

    I’ve said for a while that Levenson would be a fantastic ruse for bringing in censorship in the internet age.

    In the best manipulative way, when the people ask for it rather than by force.

    Most people actually want more state control of media and think it’s fair to sue people on twitter and blogs for expressing their opinions etc.

    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
    H. L. Mencken “

  3. Anonymous says:

    Sounds like somebody winding Ben up. I don’t think it’s terribly credible.

    In The Omen film there’s a series of unexplained deaths, I guess we need to wait for more as the creature grows.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I dont think most people want more censorship, but regardless of this, the newspaper comments columns will be manipulated to give the impression that the public wants it (those columns that do allow comments these days, it seems that anything where a concensus damaging to the establishment could occur, commenting is disallowed).

    Just as in the days of Ted Heath’s EEC campaign, and prior to that the adbication of the Prince of Wales before WW2, a campaign of letter writing to the papers by government agents moulded public opinion and gave their desired outcome.

    I think much of what we have seen lately, from Sovile to this latest episode, has been about the curtailing of free speech, its the Hegelian Dialect being played to perfection-well they have been doing it now for nigh on 2000 years, but you would think the public would be wise to it as well by now?.

    The internet was always the goal, they already controlled the MSM.

    I’m ashamed of what this country has become (or perhaps always was), its hypocrisy in bringing “democracy” to other countries whist being a dictatorship iself would be laughable if it wasnt so serious.

  5. Anonymous says:

    It’s often been stated that Brian’s report had only “one page” in reference to the internet; this is not actually true. If you pull out all the mentions of the net and plonk them into a single document you get several pages, much more if you include the quoted evidence from various witnesses.

    The warnings in the above piece should be heeded though. For example, buried in appendix 3 we have this:

    “In an era where the internet has displaced nearly every other form of communication in terms of its scope, use and geographical reach, the extent to which claims of defamation can be pursued against statements published on the internet is a pressing concern.” (3.180)

    “The desirability and practicality of regulating internet content is a hotly contested subject and the existing legal position is complex, both as a result of the fact that there is no comprehensive framework at a domestic level which establishes a mechanism for regulation of the internet and secondly because of the extent to which the courts have tried, not always successfully, to apply the traditional principles of defamation to the Internet.” (3.181)

    “A comprehensive framework of coherent rules and regulation remains lacking and it is likely that the law will be subject to further development in this area.” (3.186)

    In other words, “We can’t do anything about it currently but take this as public notice that we are probably going to try and do something about it in the future and will use defamation claims as one excuse to do so” which is essentially what the article says.

    This sort of general assault is going on everywhere.

  6. Anonymous says:

    This is what happened.

    The Royals were pissed off, so they sent their agent to kill her as revenge.

    Or someone from hospital was paid to kill.

    Things the media fail to report are: When it happened, where exactly in the hospital, were the cameras on, why isn’t footage released, why isn’t an autopsy done?

    What was her mental health like?

    This is suspicious

  7. Anonymous says:

    Add to the above list was she in good health at the time of death. Did she have any sort of terminal illness. When will the body be released. Will relatives in India be allowed to her returned and buried. And, will they allow an autopsy in India.
    We’ve seen all too often this scenario played out and read it like a book.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Maybe it was that SPIKED comforting drink from a friend?

    HETT

    PS Nearly impossible to read the 4+ numbers then play the verbal help and the robot goes in spako dalek mode so have to reset by entering rubbish just to have another chance what a game TAP!!??

  9. Anonymous says:

    When Michael Christian was introducing the prank call, he said:

    “We have been handed a phone number…we have been told that this is the hospital where Kate Middleton is currently staying.”

    The person who did the ‘handing’ sounds like they wanted a job done for somebody and would be a good place to start looking for answers…what was their motive and why was this mentioned somewhat cryptically by Michael?

    Did this person also suggest a time it would be best to make the call?

    If this was indeed a ritual played out to the public by the satanic elite, it would have been important to know that Jacintha would take the call herself.

    How convenient that the vulnerable nurse was of a particularly unassuming and loyal nature and was also going to be staying the night in the nurses home a few doors down.

  10. Anonymous says:

    Very interesting lead regarding internet censorship.

    As former Justice Minister, Harriet Harman spoke of transparency and DWPCorruption.co.uk offered to assist her government with this, yet the DWP managed 3 times to have the site closed down, under her government, so don’t believe the hype.

    Their lawyers were asked where the alleged defamation was so it could be removed (if it ever existed) but they refused to answer the question.

    What’s now left of the original site:

    http://dwpcorruption1.wordpress.com/

    We therefore know we can’t believe this sham either:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/dec/10/leveson-report-harriet-harman-labour-plan

    We will be watching this lead with much interest.

    Thanks Ben thanks Tap.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Read the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion/Sion for Press Control as well as much other bad stuff that has come to pass. Leveson will understand it as will Con. MP Michael Ellis who’s presiding over the Communications Bill scrutiny.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.