Managed Opposition launching November in London. Riots.

More controlled opposition.  

The elites can feel their power ebbing away as the public becomes aware of their brutal paedophile ways.  Their response is to rush towards a totalitarian state with all political opposition made illegal.  But first they will organise false flag rioting to shock the world, making new repressive laws seem inevitable.  This is their next move.

Here’s the list of demands.

Rally Millions To
Parliament, London
5 November 2012

Cancel All Debt
Stop War
Redistribute the Land
Eliminate Poverty

http://www.operationjubilee.in/

The giveaway is ‘redistribute the land’.

Agenda 21.  The ending of private property.

‘cancel all debt’ should be ‘stop the government spending us into unaffordable debt’.

The rest is ‘motherhood and apple pie’….and very dangerous, laying the entire blame at the doors of Parliament.  Only through MPs can we make representation against those who rule, and limit their scope.  This is getting us to destroy our own democracy, and make repressive anti-political demonstration laws inevitable.  The troublemakers will be paid.  People will be hurt and so will property be damaged.  The pictures will be beamed across the globe.  Coincidentally something similar is scheduled to happen in the US on the same day.

Anonymous has been used to justify greater internet censorship in similar vein.


The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

18 Responses to “Managed Opposition launching November in London. Riots.”

  1. Anonymous says:

    ‘cancel all debt’ should be ‘stop the government spending us into unaffordable debt’

    I disagree. I think it should be ‘stop the government from incurring unnecessary debt by ending the relationship between public finance and private banks and enabling the Treasury to create new money, interest-free’

  2. Tapestry says:

    How will we do that, anonymous? The Rothschilds have run Britain’s finances for two hundred years, hidden from view in the background. Any MP who attempts to stand against them is eliminated, either by media assassination, or by real.

    The easiest first step is to stop the spending – which is mostly on nothing, designed purely to increase the debt.

  3. Anonymous says:

    “How will we do that, anonymous? The Rothschilds have run Britain’s finances for two hundred years, hidden from view in the background”

    It needn’t always be the case. At the moment we are paying interest in perpetuity on our currency, to private banks whose only contribution has been to run the printing presses.

    Of course we are in debt – it could be no other way. Yet we are a sovereign nation with its own currency. There is no need to “borrow” at all (the term is a misnomer because the banks do not actually have the money to lend) and the whole corrupt system can be overhauled through robust legislation.

    Admittedly politicians who have attempted this in the past have often ended up dead before they could finish the task.

  4. Tapestry says:

    You are up against a paedophile Satanic cult, who use all means to suppress opposition.

  5. Julia says:

    I don’t think the only way to sort things out is through our MPs. We have virtually no power through this route. The only way is through ourselves.
    Look at your own life and how much you are propping up the system. What can you do a bit less of to stop supporting it? What can you do a bit more of to move the power elsewhere. Are you still shopping at supermarkets, are you still paying taxes, insurance? Are you still spending time and money shopping for loads of crap you don’t really need. Look at where your money goes to, and work out ways to make it go to better places. If you add it all up, you will probably find about 80% goes pretty much straight back up to the banks and the government and the corporates to fund their agenda.
    We can’t unhook ourselves overnight, but every little shift in the right direction adds up to something much bigger.

    http://suliwrites.wordpress.com/2012/08/23/taxing/

  6. Anonymous says:

    Just out of interest, how do you know this is a secret service planned operation and towards removing property rights?

    Cheers, TH.

  7. Tapestry says:

    What UK political movement believes in redistribution of property rights?

    The UN does. Agenda 21. Check it out.

  8. Anonymous says:

    I know about Agenda 21, they published a book called ‘Our global neighbourhood’ but what sources suggest that this protest is designed to implement it. And that anonymous is a spoof movement?

    Cheers, TH

  9. Tapestry says:

    There are pieces on The Tap exposing Anonymous as a CIA operation. If you can check the archive, that saves me having to do it.

  10. Anonymous says:

    OK, thanks.

    What do we do if worst case happens in 14 days.

  11. Tapestry says:

    Don’t get suckered into joining in. Realise that the worst of the violence carried out by ‘students’ is really agents provocateurs at work. It will be made to look as ugly as possible, and there will be casualties. That’s how Police States bring in repressive laws – by making them seem necessary.

  12. Anonymous says:

    WHat I meant is. If a police state is bought in, property rights taken away.

    Just think of how difficult that would be to enforce. As is always said, the 99% is the sleeping dragon. The people never know that they are really the powerful. That is why so much effort is made by governments and the powerful to control the masses.

    Put in place state ownership of property in a supposed democracy and that draggon may finally wake up and be grumpy.

    You’re going to need police and army on the streets and there is a lot more people than there are either of those available.

    As I understand it there are not concentration camps all over the UK as there is in the states.

    On a practical level, do you stop paying your mortgage if the government takes ownership of property?

    If the rights of property are given up, do you still owe the bank for the property or does the debt now belong to the state?

    Do you now have to pay rent to the state to stay there (assuming you’re not asked to move)?

    What about renters, do you stop paying to your landlord and start paying rent to the state?

  13. Tapestry says:

    It’s done by degrees so the masses don’t realise. Same as the EU takes over step by step, without it ever being stated in advance what the endgame is.

  14. Anonymous says:

    “The giveaway is ‘redistribute the land’.
    Agenda 21. The ending of private property”

    No, its so every one has a portion of land (and really own it).

    Via inalienable rights. Not privileges taken away by elites or whoever.

  15. Tapestry says:

    The agenda is to remove property rights not confer them.

  16. Anonymous says:

    I believe you misunderstood the last commenter, Tapestry. He was referring to what the Jubilee is about. It’s the opposite of Agenda 21. In a Jubilee, the land is returned to its rightful owner, with full property rights. In order for everyone to be apportioned their own land, it needs redistributing evenly. Nobody should pay for land (can God be paid with money?), unless they wish to rent extra land and someone else accepts their offer.

  17. Tapestry says:

    Even redistribution? How often will this be done? Farms broken up. Great idea. The nation would starve.

  18. Anonymous says:

    I believe people are going to be starving if things are left to carry on the way they are, with the ever-increasing debt, and chemicals and GM crops that harm the soil and interfere with nature (real nature not fake). Don’t you? Everyone could have their own farm and grow their own food, instead of being dependent upon the “elite” and the chemical companies and the supermarkets, for which they have to have slave-jobs. They would feed themselves instead of relying on the state. There is also no reason why the redistributing should be done in the most stupid way, instead of in the most intelligent way that arises, and perhaps the majority of farms wouldn’t need to be “broken up”. How often? 50 years.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.