More ad hominem attacks on WASP.

nawab patel npatel1975@hotmail.co.uk
6:49 PM (8 minutes ago)

to me
The problem with WASP is that no one should be allowed to hide being 
psuedonyms, 
no way is he a White Anglo Saxon Protestant, both “we are anonymous”  
” Smash the 
NWO” and “doctors against racism” have complained about him.
some of what he says is blatently wrong, if you stand by what you say you 
put your 
own name, 
where i diasagree with others is that i dont think he is a fool, i think he 
knows exactly 
whats he’s doing, please see that names are put on all submissions
thanks NP

The Tap Blog
6:58 PM (0 minutes ago)

to nawab
It’s not possible to tell people on the internet how to identify themselves.
How can you know what is and what is not a real name?
Same in newspapers and TV.  Most use pseudonyms
or euphemistically pen-names.  The organizations you mention are
amusing examples, Nawab. e.g. anonymous!!!!!! No names there.
NAWAB writes – we are all suspicious of him, if you write to 
any mag or paper you have to put your name.  this is spoiling
 it for us..

TAP.  If you drop a letter to a newspaper you have to add your 
name, address, phone number, as well as name to the 
newspaper, but not to the readers.  Many are written 
anonymously in print, or with pseudonym.  Nice try, Nawab.
I have no idea of his real identity.  Sorry.  But you are wrong.  
People like reading his stuff.  And this is my blog.
I publish what interests me.  
WASP is doing a great job.  He must be good as he gets so 
much flak  coming back in return,
all of it, ad hominem, and nothing about the issues he 
addresses.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Responses to “More ad hominem attacks on WASP.”

  1. Sackerson says:

    When I’ve had a go at WASP, I’ve not used the cowardly Anon approach. Stand up and be counted, lily-livered swine!

  2. Sackerson says:

    Your comment clearly implies physical threat. It has been bookmarked for future reference to the police.

  3. Tapestry says:

    Now come on, chaps. There’s more testosterone on here than the rutting season in Richmond Park. Pack up the ad hominen stuff and go for arguments that prove WASP to be wrong if you can. Threats not tolerated.

  4. Tapestry says:

    threats were made on IP 86.175.101.250, using search.glarysoft.com to locate blog, using btcentralplus.com as ISP.

  5. Julia says:

    I am a big fan of WASP. he sends in really good stuff. Much of it I read without making any comment. If there are many more like me, then WASP has a huge number of unwritten positive comments, way way more than the few aggressive ones that have appeared only recently.

    If you do not like what he writes, there is no need to make a personal attack on him. It is enough just to offer your own views side by side with other peoples.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.