The Moon Is Hollow. How Come?

Tap, 5 arguments why the Moon must be a spaceship.

1. The Moon’s orbit is at a miraculous distance from the Earth. It is in the only position between the Sun and the Earth that it can be the same size as the Sun in the sky periodically causing solar eclipses as viewed from the Earth.

2. At 2,160 miles in diameter the Moon’s impossibly large to be a natural satellite of tiny planet Earth. Jupiter is the largest planet in our solar system. It has 64 moons. The largest – Ganymede – measures only 3,270 miles across. The Moon’s extraordinary size actually makes it the fifth largest satellite in the solar system.

Only the gas planets – Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune – have the gravitational pull to capture such a massive body as the Moon in its orbit. In comparison, the “moons” of Mars, Phobos and Deimos, are 16 miles and 8 miles across. None of the “rock planets” in our solar system – that is Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars – can possibly acquire proper satellites.

3. No convincing scientific theory has explained the presence of the Moon. The Moon’s not a caught asteroid, its shape is of a planetoid, similar to the Moons of Saturn and Jupiter. The Martian asteroid moons Phobos and Deimos are ugly irregular-shaped objects whilst the Moon is an almost perfect sphere, like a planet. The traditional “scientific” explanation of the origin of the Moon is that it was previously a chunk of the Earth, the outcome of a Cosmic Collision billions of years ago. It is unexplained exactly how the original singular planet was split in such a way that both became spherical bodies entwined in orbit. Robin Brett (NASA scientist) said: “It seems easier to explain the non-existence of the Moon than its existence.”

4. Experiments have shown the Moon is hollow. In 1969 NASA hit the Moon with a lunar module in an impact that generated the equivalent in energy of about 1 ton TNT. Of this event, Maurice Ewing, the co-director of the lunar seismic experiment, said “it is as though someone had struck a bell, say, in the belfry of a church, a single blow and found that the reverberation from it continued for 30 minutes.” On a later mission NASA repeated the experiment, this time with the equivalent of 11 tons TNT. This time the Moon shook for 3 hours 20 minutes and enabled them to learn something else: according to one NASA source, the Moon “wobbled” in such a precise way that it was “almost as though it had gigantic hydraulic damper struts inside it”. At the time, Sean C. Soloman. MIT said experiments had suggested the “frightening possibility that the Moon might be hollow.”

5. The thin outer crust – 20 miles or so – of the Moon is composed of an impossible array of elements and processed alloys that make the surface extraordinarily hard, almost as if it was armour designed to resist hard impacts. Scientists cannot account for the huge amount of titanium found in lunar rock. Process metals like brass and mica have also been found, along with Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237, which are only formed in nuclear reactions and found on Earth in nuclear waste.

This appears to me to be very convincing evidence the Moon is either a wholly or partly manufactured object. At the very least Occam’s razor suggests the simplest explanation is usually correct and in this case the Cosmic Collision theory is too complicated, implausible and leaves too many unanswered questions to be assumed correct.

The question is what are the questions this fact about the Moon raises? Is the Moon an operations center for extra-terrestrial beings to manipulate events on Earth (David Icke “Moon Matrix”). Is the Moon an observation station for benign alien David Attenboroughs to discretely watch life on Earth? Could the Moon be the caravan of inter-galactic gypsies, that have found a use for Earth and the Solar System? Is the Moon even still occupied? Something else?

– Me.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

17 Responses to “The Moon Is Hollow. How Come?”

  1. Nivek says:

    gravity @ moons surface is 1/6 of earth’s; that’s an important clue 4 U

  2. Woodsy42 says:

    It’s swiss cheese of course!

    I suggest you read Immanuel Velikovsky Worlds in Collision and Earth in Upheaval.
    He obviously didn’t have the modern data to get the details right, but look at his theories.

  3. Rossa says:

    And then there’s this ‘hidden’ planet, discovered by NASA, 4 times the size of Jupiter in the Oort cloud.

    http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/nasa-wise-telescope-discovers-planet-x-tyche-hercolubus-nibiru-x/

  4. Anonymous says:

    //gravity @ moons surface is 1/6 of earth’s; that’s an important clue 4 U//

    The Moon is only 1/80 Earth’s mass yet 1/4 of its diameter. There is no other satellite in the solar system in this lopsided proportion to the planet it orbits.

    Jupiter has 317.8 times the mass of the Earth. How large would a moon of Jupiter be if it was 1/80 of its mass? It would be 4 times the mass of the Earth and have a diameter of 22,175 miles! – roughly three times the Earth (7,926 miles), 2/3 the size of the “gas giant” Neptune (30,775).

    Jupiter’s largest moon, Ganymede, is only a fraction of that size, a few thousand miles across.

    It’s true that the Moon’s key statistics aren’t that unusual compared to other satellites in the solar system. Its area, volume and mass fit smoothly where you’d expect between Io and Europa according to its radius. It’s mainly the position of the Moon – around the Earth – that is so out of whack, that and it appears to be hollow.

    We probably don’t know yet if the other satellites in the solar system are hollow. If they’re not, perhaps an alternative theory for the origin of the Moon is that it was once a satellite of one of the gas planets. An extra-terrestrial civilization may have hollowed it out and repositioned it around the Earth.

    ————————–

    Satellite – Relative to Earth

    Io

    Radius 0.286
    Area 0.082
    Volume 0.023
    Mass 0.015 

    Moon

    Radius 0.273
    Area 0.074
    Volume 0.02
    Mass 0.0123

    Europa

    Radius 0.245
    Area 0.061 
    Volume 0.015 
    Mass 0.008 

    – Me.

  5. Anonymous says:

    ////gravity @ moons surface is 1/6 of earth’s; that’s an important clue 4 U////

    Just realised that I didn’t respond to your comment.

    How is it a clue?

    I think I was going to say the moon’s gravity is similar to where it should be compared to the satellites in orbit around the gas giants.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Could the Moon have be positioned where it is (where it gives us annular, partial and perfect – with corona) eclipses but no absolute eclipse) by the same more ancient, more massive civilization that built Stone Henge, Pyramid at Giza and the other massive monuments?

    They could have moved the Moon from its original orbit around Jupiter and placed it in an orbit of the Earth, and put some form of damper system inside it to stabilize it, where it would, every-so-often, at a time that could be predicted, eclipse the sun.

    This would mean that the Moon is probably not inhabited, unless there are new inhabitants or the colonial remnants of the original civilization still survive there after their civilization was wiped out by the end of the Ice Age.

    – Me.

  7. Julia says:

    The moon controls the tides and women’s periods! It is also a kind of searchlight. When i am camping, i always liken a full moon to someone leaving the lights on. It is usually colder at full moon( we had one on tuesday). You can also optimise planting by moontimes because of the effect the moon has on drawing water. So if the moon is a control tower, it is controlling water, women, light and heat, or at least influencing them. what would happen if it wasn’t there? This gets very interesting! Maybe the seas would be flat and level. Maybe women would not lose blood every month and function better as a result. Maybe we would sleep better at night. Maybe we would be warmer. Women’s periods are often described as a curse. Maybe they are actually not meant to be. They have been around for so long, as has the moon, we just accept it.
    This brings me onto fertility. Girls are now being prescribed the pill to regulate periods. So if the moon is a control over women… (The OWG love controlling women so it fits! ), why control them with the pill? Is it to introduce infertility, moodiness, mind control? So there is no monthly cycle if there is no moon. Which leads me to question the whole scientific explanation we are given from an early age of conception and fertility. I wouldn’t mind betting that there is a non pharmaceutical industry way of controlling fertility, in fact I think the australian aborigines have some root they chew to prevent conception. Similarly the ancients had their fertility rituals to enhance fertility. It has all got so horribly mechanical over the years with fear of pregnancy taught early, and “Family planning” is not very spiritual is it? And at the other end of the scale the grossness of pornography, and the horror of pedophilia. There doesnt seem to be much naturalness left in what should be one of the most amazing parts of our whole being.

  8. Nivek says:

    Moon with 1/80 of earth’s mass and 1/4 of its diameter would be consistant with it being solid rather than hollow, with an average density only slightly less than earth’s

  9. Anonymous says:

    Nivek – the centre of the moon would likely have been hollowed out, then filled with the stuff of civilization, including “damper struts”, and other things besides.

    Your comment reminds me of the argument that the Moon’s moment of inertia is 0.394, bang on the moment of inertia of a solid (0.4, vs 0.67 for a hollow object). This is suppose to tell us the moon has a small (liquid?) core.

    However, it doesn’t take much research to tell us this doesn’t actually tell us anything about the moon’s internal structure. Io, a moon of Jupiter, has a MOI of 0.377 – very close to the moon’s* compared to other celestial objects. If you check the wiki-page you’ll find that Io is hypothesised to have a large, solid Iron core. So the MOI number doesn’t tell you anything about the internal structure of the moon.

    *Here’s a list of the moment of inertia of celestial bodies. Notice that the moon has the highest of all – just eeked below the required number (0.4) to qualify as solid.

    Ganymede 0.3105
    Titan 0.34
    Callisto 0.354
    Io 0.37685
    Moon 0.394
    Europa 0.346

    Earth 0.331
    Venus 0.33
    Mars 0.366
    Mercury 0.33

    Another mystery about the moon is why the composition of moon dust differs from the moon rocks, and why some moon rocks are magnetic, when the moon isn’t.

    http://www.space.com/13559-moon-rocks-magnetic-field-lunar-dynamo.html

    Apparently, moon dust is also a billion years older than the moon.

    – Me.

  10. “Moon rocks”? From the Los Alamos testing ground, more likely. “Moon rocks” requires a religious-style belief in “Moon landings”.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Peter, perhaps that is why the titanium is virtually identical to that on Earth? They can also find no evidence in the Moon rocks in favour of the “big whack” theory.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2121135/So-DID-moon-Moon-rocks-evidence-space-rock-supposed-knocked-bits-Earth.html

    I’m not totally convinced the moon landings were staged. I could understand if the first landing pictures that appeared on tv was shot in a film studio, to ensure they got it right.

    – Me.

  12. Anonymous says:

    http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=107885

    Interesting thread.

    Copied out some of the text below –

    “1. The moon is far older than previously thought, even older than the earth.
    2. The moon has at least three distinct layers of rocks. The heaviest layers are found on or near the surface!
    3. If the earth and moon were created at the same time, as theory suggests, and near each other, then why has earth got far more iron and the moon very little?
    4. Moon rocks were found to be extremely dry, devoid of water, and do not appear to have had water ever in any substantial amount. Yet moon rocks were found containing bits of ‘rusted’ iron!
    5. Water vapor clouds were observed over the surface of the moon, coming from within the Moon, releasing the water vapor during moonquakes. Why?
    6. Moon rocks were found also to be magnetized, not strongly enough to pick up nails or even a paper clip, but magnetized just the same. But how can this be since the Moon has no magnetic field?
    7. Where did the maria come from on the surface of the Moon, since the moon has never been hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions?
    8. Why is four-fifths of the maria surface of the Moon all located on the Earthside hemisphere? Few maria are found on the far side of the Moon!
    9. What are the mysterious mascons- or large dense circular masses buried deep within the moon, some 20 to 40 miles below the surface where each maria is located?
    10. Is the Moon hollow? Then why is the interior – core of the Moon much less dense than the outer layers?
    11. Why were metals such as elemental titanium, uranium, and pure(non-rusting) iron found in the hardened surface and lighter elements like pure elemental aluminum nonexistent?
    12. Why should the Moon have a near perfect circular orbit around the Earth?
    13. Is the Moon the creation of some highly advanced alien intelligence, and is there falsifiable scientific proof of this theory???”

    – Me.

  13. Anonymous says:

    i,m reading a great book about this at the moment… its called:WHO BUILT THE MOON;..look it up

    gary

  14. Anonymous says:

    So let’s say the moon is a ship/teraformer?
    Which would explain us bombing it
    What we find inside
    Wow.
    Could and most likely will change how we look at existince as a whole
    Deep scary stuff
    And if they did all of the above
    Would we know about it before it is too late

  15. Ulf The Wolve says:

    Presumably, 99% of the “facts” and assumptions
    mentioned in the above text and comments
    will be proven false in future times … but
    that single 1% of truth, of eternal truth is also contained in it.
    Can you see this small pure diamond of eternal
    truth blinking through the lines?

  16. Anonymous says:

    if the moon was not there we would not exist , period, nor would any other form of life on this planet.i believe the moon was built to keep us alive.i also believe it is hollow , because it was built!aliens ,also , are not aliens, just a more evolved form of us.they do not age or get sick.watch ancient aliens on history 2, one episode is two hours long. it explains all of this the bible , how it was changed and alot more.they are watching us to see when we will develop the rest of our brains and become more like them.they will probably not come here again until we are more intelligent and peaceful. they used to visit us way before we know, caused us to be where we are today. the moon is hollow because it would not ring like a bell ,like it did when hit by a lunar lander, if it was solid. it is also how they observe us, and monitor us like a science experiment.they want to know how they came to be , just like we are doing!!!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.