Anne and Hollie Greig are meeting Owen Paterson in the next few days, to challenge people in government, as regards the raping of children. The list of perpetrators includes judges, law officers, head teachers, so-called ”care” workers amongst others.
PICTURE – Hollie Greig, mother Anne and helper Robert Green, who is campaigning for a public enquiry into their case.
Why Are Shropshire Social Services Trying To Intimidate Holly Greig?
Holly Greig, a Down Syndrome girl, was abused by a gang of paedophiles in Aberdeen. There were 14 perpetrators, including her own social worker/carer and her own father. She went to the Police with her mother to report what had been happening. Subsequent to that, Anne, the mother, was dragged away and slung in a mental hospital in the year 2000.
Anne escaped from the institution, and was passed as fit by a medical examination. Her solicitor asked for the documentation that was used to drag Anne from her home. No warrant has ever been produced.
In 1997 Anne’s brother died alone in a car fire not far from the family home. Holly later said that her uncle had caught her father ‘doing it’. He told the father that he would report him, to which the father replied that he would have him killed. This is apparently what happened.
The authorities claimed the evidence was not reliable enough to justify an investigation into the paedophile ring. The Police didn’t interview any one of the 14 perpetrators or the seven other victims that Holly had identified. This was admitted to by the investigating officer, who was also a friend of Holly’s carer who had been involved with the abuse.
Although no crime was investigated, Holly was sent a sum of GBP 13,000 by the Victim Compensation Scheme, with no crime officially committed. The News Of The World ran this story without details of the paedophile ring, as the circumstances of a payment with no crime was exceptional. Since then the NOTW has gone entirely silent after being told to ”button it”.
Scottish officialdom tried to blank the whole case. There is a paedophile gang abusing Scottish children, and the whole of the Scottish hierarchy tried to cover up the vase. One resignation resulted, once it was proven that the head legal officer of Scotland, Mrs Angelini, member of Common Purpose and about to be a keynote speaker at a CP meeting, was lying about the case.
The journalist who exposed Mrs Angelini, Robert Green, talking in the clips below, was arrested. He was sent the transcripts of his arrest interview by the Police. He alleges that the transcript tapes were tampered with. He was arrested again, and the interview tapes were tampered with again, he claims.
Holly and Anne then moved to live in Shropshire at Ruyton XI Towns. Their home was ransacked on 3rd June, on the instructions of Shropshire Social Services, who claimed they were investigating a missing person, even though they knew she was away on a small holiday. The Councillor who carried out the house invasion at Ruyton XI Towns has since resigned. The villagers are supportive to Anne and Hollie, and they want to know more about what is going on, and why they are being harassed by Shropshire Social Services. Surely the criminals are based in Scotland, so what’s this to Shropshire? The Chief Executive of Shropshire Council, Kim Ryley is the President of the Association Of Council Chief Executives in Britain, an organisation ironically known by the name of Solace.
One of the rapists was a senior officer in the Scottish Police. A member of the judiciary was also involved in the rape gang. The Chairman of the North East Scotland Committee On Child Protection was another of the rapists. Another was the Head Teacher of Hollie’s special school. This does not look good for the ”índustry”. Kim Ryley claims that local government is the most efficient part of all of government. It doesn’t appear very efficient at bringing justice to paedophile rape victims.
Hollie was infected with an STD at aged 10. This was communicated by a doctor to the Head Teacher of Hollie’s school, who it turned out, was one of the rapists, and a local GP, both of whom took no action. That could have stopped twenty years of abuse for Hollie and the other children if it had been acted on correctly. The report was ignored.
A psychiatrist report was made during the long slow exposure of this case. The psychiatrist asked Hollie what had happened. She described rape by her father, and by her brother. She didn’t talk about it, as her father used his belt on her. She has nightmares and flashbacks about what happened. Many abusers target mentally handicapped children, as they think they will not be able to report what is happening. Hollie like many Down Syndrome kids is an excellent communicator, and has good and detailed recall. The psychiatrist’s report was withheld by the Police.
A local Police Officer in Shropshire has been supportive of Holly and Anne. He lost his job.
The growing team of people helping Anne and Hollie took their complaints to the head of the Down Syndrome Association. On their advice, the mother Anne decided to move away from Aberdeen and make a fresh start which is why they came with Hollie to live in sleepy Shropshire. Shropshire’s not proving quite so sleepy as they thought it would.
The Security Services are involved in spying on those who are trying to expose the Holly Greig story. Emails are being tampered with. Phone calls intercepted and people are being followed. At least one witness has been murdered. Someone very powerful obviously feels very threatened by the possibility that the information might get out into the public arena, where it bloody well ought to be by now, over ten years since the rapes were first reported to the Police.
It’s time the media started reporting this case. Yet the Scottish Government is still trying to hide the facts and prevent the public from knowing. There are still many children being abused by these paedophile gangs. The children are suffering terrible treatment. The Social Services who are meant to be protecting them, are involved in perpetrating the paedophile acts, and are involved in intimidation of the victims to maintain their silence. Witnesses like Anne’s brother, are being rubbed out.
Listen right to the end of the last clip. The last speaker says that paedophilia is the hallmark of the New World Order. That’s why paedophiles get away with it. They are the government now.
Read the comments under this post. It has useful web links that affect this case.
Email from Robert Green to The Tap yesterday –
The story of Hollie Greig is worldwide, but I would suspect many people in China, the USA and Pakistan know more about this horrifying and staggering story than the people of Scotland and Shropshire.
Quite apart from all the astonishing magnitude of the background information and documentation that exists all over the web, the fact is that as far as Shropshire is concerned, the Information Commissioner has ruled that the council has broken the FOI law and as a result of his inquiry, he established that senior officers Tim Collard and Stephen Chandler had repeatedly lied over the appalling raid on the home of Hollie and Anne in Ruyton on the 3rd June last year, instigated by senior council officials.
Check out holliedemandsjustice or view Robert Green Wake Up Call or the South African film Robert Green Freedom Central.
You can be sure that local media outlets the Shropshire Star and BBC Radio Shropshire have been firmly told to keep the facts of this shocking case from the people of Shropshire.
REPLY – They should read The Tap, Robert. Thanks for calling in. I hope more people get to hear about what’s really going on right under their noses. As for the credibility of local government in Shropshire, it doesn’t have any. I have to say, after living in the County for over half a century, this is very shocking. We don’t pay the Council Chief Executive GBP 200,000 a year so our children can be raped by council staff, and he doesn’t ensure that justice is done for the victims.
I’d like to ask him. ‘‘Kim Ryley, do you have anything to say about this?’‘
Here’s a nice space for his reply –
FROM COMMENTS BELOW –
Reply from local MPs office –
Owen is away from the office today but has seen your message and has asked me to drop you a quick line to let you know that he has been in touch with Mrs Greig for several years. He wrote to her just a few weeks ago asking for her to get in touch if there are any outstanding issues she would like to raise. She came to a surgery and we have written in the past to the Scottish First Minister, the responsible Minister, the police and the Chief Executive of Shropshire Council.
Owen will always respond to any direct requests for help from Mrs Greig. We have not, however, heard from her for some time.
The MP for Oswestry is Owen Paterson, Secretary Of State For Northern Ireland.
robert green said…
I would hope that Owen Paterson will put aside any political and/or personal allegiances in Shropshire to one side and remember his obligations to his constituents. There can hardly be ones more deserving of his support than Hollie and Anne Greig, given the abominable persecution they have suffered by a council run by his party.
It is particularly worrying that Mr Paterson is understood to have worked closely with Councillor Aggie Caesar-Homden, the elected representative most responsible for the attack on the ladies, as Cabinet member in charge of children and vulnerable adults.
Moreover, Mr Paterson has indicated that he has been trying to help the Greigs for years, well before the latest interference from Shropshire Council.
This is simply an exaggeration. It has been very difficult to persuade Mr Paterson to do anything at all of a constructive nature to assist the two ladies. I have certainly had that problem when appealing to him on their behalf.
However, let us allow Mr Paterson the opportunity now to put things right.
The council have been publicly shown to have broken the law by the Freedom of Information Commissioner and that two senior managers, Ian Collard and Stephen chandler have repeatedly lied, even when challenged, about their knowledge of the raid the Greigs` home and the subsequent vandalism committed by those present.
Please, Mr Paterson, you are there as a member of parliament to serve the interests of your constituents rather than the Conservative Party.
Finally, let me stress that the Hollie Greig Campaign is strictly humanitarian, not political and we have dedicated supporters from all political backgrounds and beliefs.
All we are asking is for elected representatives to do their duty and honour their commitments, irrespective of which party they belong to.
what would you request Owen Paterson to do exactly?
Robert Green said…
We would like Owen Paterson to formally press for a full, open and independent inquiry to be held into all aspects of the Hollie Greig case and those related to it,including the other serious crimes that are alleged to have taken place in Aberdeen.
No-one is expecting anything other than every obstruction from the Scottish establishment, as it is the head of the justice system, Elish Angiolini who blocked the first inquiry in 2000, when she headed the Crown Office in Aberdeen and then in 2009 in her current role.
However, we have successfully established, with documentary evidence, that she lied about her involvement and moreover she has almost certainly used public funds in order to issue private legal threats to the media when they were about to expose her. I understand that all the principal Scottish media organs received the threats, as did Google in a letter sent by her solicitors, Levy & McRae, dated 4th December 2009.
Her attempts to obstruct the truth about the funding of this law firm has been publicised in respected magazines, The Firm and The Drum.
We believe that the documentary exposure led to her suddenly announcing, on 1st October 2010, her impending resignation.
Nonetheless, there should be no good reason for Mr Paterson not to offer his support. Recently Mrs Angiolini`s integrity has come into question yet again over her conduct relating to the Lockerbie case.
In Shropshire, as is quite clear from the Commissioner`s official report, senior council officers have broken the law and repeatedly lied over the issue of the Greigs.
Additionally, Councillor Caesar -Homden has acted with not only a staggering lack of judgement but also with a lack of compassion and humanity that must render her totally unsuitable for her current role.
We would expect public support from Mr Paterson to remove the individuals responsible, including Mr Ryley, of course, from their posts, not just for the issue described, but in the best interests of the people of Shropshire, as it has become transparently clear that those individuals are unworthy of their public responsibilities.
Finally, we would think it reasonable for Mr Paterson to press the council to provide a full and unconditional apology to these two immensely courageous ladies, who are a great credit to the county that they chose to make their home after their flight from persecution.
Robert, can you demonstrate that you speak for Anne and Hollie Greig, when making these demands? Owen Paterson has said that it is a long time since he heard from Anne and Hollie Greig. He has stated that he is willing to keep working on their case. If they are making these demands, it would be very different in effect, from someone else doing so on their behalf, whatever the merits of the case you make.
Yes, I have written authority to speak for Anne and Hollie, which Mr Paterson has had in his possession for some time.
I did speak to his assistant at Westminster a few weeks ago, but got the distinct impression that Mr Paterson regarded the case as one he would much rather avoid, which brings me back to my earlier comments about his apparent priority for political and personal associations
I don’t think you can assume anything until you have spoken directly to Owen Paterson in person. Once you’ve done that, then you would have the knowledge as to whether he will write to propose a public enquiry or not.
I would agree with you that there are enough uncomfortable facts surrounding this case that a public enquiry should be held. Government is in danger of falling into disrepute, if such events can take place within public administration and the rot is not thoroughly rooted out.
ROBERT GREEN – Every single MP and MSP has been formally approached with the details of Hollie`s case and Deputy Leader Nick Clegg was confronted personally about the matter in Kent. A Scottish elector put a question to Alex Salmond on BBC`s Question Time a year ago,but this was edited out. David Dimbleby refused to comment subsequently. I can assure you that the Hollie Greig Case is known about at the highest level. Who are they protecting and why? Many constituents have directly challenged their MPs, but just four have had the courage to do anything at all, John Hemming, Michael Moore and Mark Simmonds. It is to their credit as their constituencies have no connection with either Aberdeen or Shropshire. The fourth is my own MP, David Mowat. However, you are right about a further direct meeting with Owen Paterson, which we hope to arrange soon.
TAP – Owen says he hasn’t heard from the Greigs for a while. He is known as a diligent local MP who doesn’t back off from difficult situations once he takes on a cause. He has already written on your behalf to many players in this drama, and even wrote to you and you didn’t reply. I would not see him as one of the rank closers. That is not to say that I disagree with the objectives of your campaign.
TAP – Furthermore, this story was put up on a much busier website than The Tap, Political Pundits (.co.uk version) where it might have received tens of thousands of visitors. Within hours many complaints were received saying that you are accusing nearly everyone in politics of being paedophile (exaggeration, but that’s the point made), and the story was taken down.
It’s a shame that the good work you do in trying to help the victims is undermined by broadening your attacks too far and wide. It would be better to fight one battle at a time, and see if there is any possibility of getting justice for Hollie and Anne, first, before making more general accusations. We nearly got some good exposure for this.
I’m beginning to wonder if this another case of managed dissent. By claiming to be telling the story, but going too far, all it does is discredit the real story. Was Anne’s brother really murdered? Are all politicians either paedophiles, or part of a general conspiracy to hide their acts from public knowledge? Robert’s behaving exactly as a managed dissent operative should be behaving. That way Anne and Hollie’s real story gets discredited before it is even given a chance. If I was Anne, I’d try to work with a bona fide politician like Owen Paterson to advance her case if she wants to do so, and drop Robert Green from hereon. Green could well be working for the other side, becoming a David Icke type of figure, discrediting the case he appears to be backing by exaggerating it, and discrediting all the victims of state-employed paedophiles, in the process.